IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i21p5803-d440760.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of the Influence of Kraft Lignin and the Kraft Lignin/Silica System as Cell Carriers on the Stability and Efficiency of the Anaerobic Digestion Process

Author

Listed:
  • Agnieszka A. Pilarska

    (Department of Plant-Derived Food Technology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, ul. Wojska Polskiego 31, 60-624 Poznań, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Wolna-Maruwka

    (Department of General and Environmental Microbiology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, ul. Szydłowska 50, 60-656 Poznań, Poland)

  • Alicja Niewiadomska

    (Department of General and Environmental Microbiology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, ul. Szydłowska 50, 60-656 Poznań, Poland)

  • Krzysztof Pilarski

    (Department of Biosystems Engineering, Poznań University of Life Sciences, ul. Wojska Polskiego 50, 60-627 Poznań, Poland)

  • Artur Olesienkiewicz

    (Polbiotech Laboratorium Sp. z o.o., Poznań Science and Technology Park, ul. Rubież 46, 61-612 Poznań, Poland)

Abstract

This study compares the effects of pure kraft lignin and the kraft lignin/silica system (1:4 by weight). The comparative analysis of the physicochemical properties of both carriers showed that the kraft lignin/silica system was characterised by better properties. The experiment conducted in the study involved continuous anaerobic digestion under mesophilic conditions. Three samples were degraded in the following order: (i) sewage sludge (SS), (ii) SS with the addition of kraft lignin, and (iii) SS with the addition of the kraft lignin/silica system. A quantitative analysis of the digestate samples was carried out by means of in situ fluorescence. It showed more intense proliferation of microorganisms in the SS + kraft lignin/silica variant than in the sample with pure kraft lignin. The highest amount of biogas was obtained in the SS + kraft lignin/silica variant (689 m 3 Mg −1 VS, including 413 m 3 Mg −1 VS of methane; VS—volatile solids). There were comparable amounts of biogas in the SS variant (526 m 3 Mg −1 VS of biogas, including 51% of methane) and the SS + kraft lignin variant (586 m 3 Mg −1 VS of biogas, including 54% of methane). The research clearly showed that the material with a high share of silica was an effective cell carrier.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnieszka A. Pilarska & Agnieszka Wolna-Maruwka & Alicja Niewiadomska & Krzysztof Pilarski & Artur Olesienkiewicz, 2020. "A Comparison of the Influence of Kraft Lignin and the Kraft Lignin/Silica System as Cell Carriers on the Stability and Efficiency of the Anaerobic Digestion Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-24, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:21:p:5803-:d:440760
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/21/5803/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/21/5803/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agnieszka A. Pilarska & Agnieszka Wolna-Maruwka & Krzysztof Pilarski, 2018. "Kraft Lignin Grafted with Polyvinylpyrrolidone as a Novel Microbial Carrier in Biogas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Abbas, Yasir & Yun, Sining & Wang, Ziqi & Zhang, Yongwei & Zhang, Xianmei & Wang, Kaijun, 2021. "Recent advances in bio-based carbon materials for anaerobic digestion: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    3. Liang, Yue-gan & Xu, Lu & Bao, Jing & Firmin, Kotchikpa Adekunle & Zong, Wenming, 2020. "Attapulgite enhances methane production from anaerobic digestion of pig slurry by changing enzyme activities and microbial community," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 222-232.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Krzysztof Pilarski & Agnieszka A. Pilarska & Piotr Boniecki & Gniewko Niedbała & Kamil Witaszek & Magdalena Piekutowska & Małgorzata Idzior-Haufa & Agnieszka Wawrzyniak, 2021. "Degree of Biomass Conversion in the Integrated Production of Bioethanol and Biogas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Jakub Mazurkiewicz, 2022. "The Biogas Potential of Oxytree Leaves," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Agnieszka A. Pilarska & Krzysztof Pilarski & Mariusz Adamski & Maciej Zaborowicz & Dorota Cais-Sokolińska & Agnieszka Wolna-Maruwka & Alicja Niewiadomska, 2022. "Eco-Friendly and Effective Diatomaceous Earth/Peat (DEP) Microbial Carriers in the Anaerobic Biodegradation of Food Waste Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Agnieszka A. Pilarska & Agnieszka Wolna-Maruwka & Alicja Niewiadomska & Krzysztof Pilarski & Mariusz Adamski & Aleksandra Grzyb & Jarosław Grządziel & Anna Gałązka, 2021. "Silica/Lignin Carrier as a Factor Increasing the Process Performance and Genetic Diversity of Microbial Communities in Laboratory-Scale Anaerobic Digesters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ur Rehman, Ata & Zhao, Tianyu & Shah, Muhammad Zahir & Khan, Yaqoob & Hayat, Asif & Dang, Changwei & Zheng, Maosheng & Yun, Sining, 2023. "Nanoengineering of MgSO4 nanohybrid on MXene substrate for efficient thermochemical heat storage material," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    2. Tsui, To-Hung & Zhang, Le & Zhang, Jingxin & Dai, Yanjun & Tong, Yen Wah, 2022. "Engineering interface between bioenergy recovery and biogas desulfurization: Sustainability interplays of biochar application," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    3. Krzysztof Pilarski & Agnieszka A. Pilarska & Piotr Boniecki & Gniewko Niedbała & Karol Durczak & Kamil Witaszek & Natalia Mioduszewska & Ireneusz Kowalik, 2020. "The Efficiency of Industrial and Laboratory Anaerobic Digesters of Organic Substrates: The Use of the Biochemical Methane Potential Correction Coefficient," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Agnieszka A. Pilarska & Krzysztof Pilarski & Mariusz Adamski & Maciej Zaborowicz & Dorota Cais-Sokolińska & Agnieszka Wolna-Maruwka & Alicja Niewiadomska, 2022. "Eco-Friendly and Effective Diatomaceous Earth/Peat (DEP) Microbial Carriers in the Anaerobic Biodegradation of Food Waste Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Agnieszka A. Pilarska & Agnieszka Wolna-Maruwka & Alicja Niewiadomska & Krzysztof Pilarski & Mariusz Adamski & Aleksandra Grzyb & Jarosław Grządziel & Anna Gałązka, 2021. "Silica/Lignin Carrier as a Factor Increasing the Process Performance and Genetic Diversity of Microbial Communities in Laboratory-Scale Anaerobic Digesters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Wu, Di & Li, Lei & Peng, Yun & Yang, Pingjin & Peng, Xuya & Sun, Yongming & Wang, Xiaoming, 2021. "State indicators of anaerobic digestion: A critical review on process monitoring and diagnosis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    7. Grzegorz Łysiak & Ryszard Kulig & Jawad Kadhim Al Aridhee, 2023. "Toward New Value-Added Products Made from Anaerobic Digestate: Part 1—Study on the Effect of Moisture Content on the Densification of Solid Digestate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Krzysztof Pilarski & Agnieszka A. Pilarska & Piotr Boniecki & Gniewko Niedbała & Kamil Witaszek & Magdalena Piekutowska & Małgorzata Idzior-Haufa & Agnieszka Wawrzyniak, 2021. "Degree of Biomass Conversion in the Integrated Production of Bioethanol and Biogas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Rubén Agregán & José M. Lorenzo & Manoj Kumar & Mohammad Ali Shariati & Muhammad Usman Khan & Abid Sarwar & Muhammad Sultan & Maksim Rebezov & Muhammad Usman, 2022. "Anaerobic Digestion of Lignocellulose Components: Challenges and Novel Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-24, November.
    10. Btissam Niya & Kaoutar Yaakoubi & Salah Eddine Azaroual & Fatima Zahra Beraich & Moha Arouch & Issam Meftah Kadmiri, 2023. "Anaerobic Digestion of Agricultural Waste Using Microbial Inocula: Performance and Characterization of Bacterial Communities Using 16S rRNA Sequencing Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-15, April.
    11. Agnieszka A. Pilarska & Piotr Boniecki & Małgorzata Idzior-Haufa & Maciej Zaborowicz & Krzysztof Pilarski & Andrzej Przybylak & Hanna Piekarska-Boniecka, 2021. "Image Analysis Methods in Classifying Selected Malting Barley Varieties by Neural Modelling," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-11, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:21:p:5803-:d:440760. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.