IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i20p5389-d428658.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Inter-Comparison of Dynamic, Fully Coupled, Electro-Mechanical, Models of Tidal Turbines

Author

Listed:
  • Arturo Ortega

    (Institute for Energy Systems, School of Engineering, The University of Edinburgh, Colin Maclaurin Road, Edinburgh EH9 3DW, UK)

  • Joseph Praful Tomy

    (Bureau Veritas Marine & Offshore, 44323 Nantes, France)

  • Jonathan Shek

    (Institute for Energy Systems, School of Engineering, The University of Edinburgh, Colin Maclaurin Road, Edinburgh EH9 3DW, UK)

  • Stephane Paboeuf

    (Bureau Veritas Marine & Offshore, 44323 Nantes, France)

  • David Ingram

    (Institute for Energy Systems, School of Engineering, The University of Edinburgh, Colin Maclaurin Road, Edinburgh EH9 3DW, UK)

Abstract

Production of electricity using hydrokinetic tidal turbines has many challenges that must be overcome to ensure reliable, economic and practical solutions. Kinetic energy from flowing water is converted to electricity by a system comprising diverse mechanical and electrical components from the rotor blades up to the electricity grid. To date these have often been modelled using simulations of independent systems, lacking bi-directional, real-time, coupling. This approach leads to critical effects being missed. Turbulence in the flow, results in large velocity fluctuations around the blades, causing rapid variation in the shaft torque and generator speed, and consequently in the voltage seen by the power electronics and so compromising the export power quality. Conversely, grid frequency and voltage changes can also cause the generator speed to change, resulting in changes to the shaft speed and torque and consequently changes to the hydrodynamics acting on the blades. Clearly, fully integrated, bi-directional, models are needed. Here we present two fully coupled models which use different approaches to model the hydrodynamics of rotor blades. The first model uses the Blade Element Momentum Theory (BEMT), resulting in an efficient tool for turbine designers. The second model also uses BEMT, combines this with an actuator line model of the blades coupled to an unsteady computational fluid dynamics simulation by OpenFOAM (CFD/BEMT). Each model is coupled to an OpenModelica model of the electro-mechanical system by an energy balance to compute the shaft speed. Each coupled system simulates the performance of a 1.2 m diameter, three-bladed horizontal axis tidal turbine tested in the University of Edinburgh FloWave Ocean Energy Research Facility. The turbulent flow around the blades and the mechanical-electrical variables during the stable period of operation are analysed. Time series and tabulated average values of thrust, torque, power, and rotational speed, as well as, electrical variables of generator power, electromagnetic torque, voltage and current are presented for the coupled system simulation. The relationship between the mechanical and electrical variables and the results from both tidal turbine approaches are discussed. Our comparison shows that while the BEMT model provides an effective design tool (leading to slightly more conservative designs), the CFD/BEMT simulations show the turbulence influence in the mechanical and electrical variables which can be especially important in assessing an additional source of stresses in the whole electro-mechanical system (though at an increased computational cost).

Suggested Citation

  • Arturo Ortega & Joseph Praful Tomy & Jonathan Shek & Stephane Paboeuf & David Ingram, 2020. "An Inter-Comparison of Dynamic, Fully Coupled, Electro-Mechanical, Models of Tidal Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:20:p:5389-:d:428658
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/20/5389/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/20/5389/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Scarlett, Gabriel & Viola, Ignazio Maria, 2020. "Unsteady hydrodynamics of tidal turbine blades," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 843-855.
    2. Togneri, Michael & Pinon, Grégory & Carlier, Clément & Choma Bex, Camille & Masters, Ian, 2020. "Comparison of synthetic turbulence approaches for blade element momentum theory prediction of tidal turbine performance and loads," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 408-418.
    3. Donald R. Noble & Samuel Draycott & Anup Nambiar & Brian G. Sellar & Jeffrey Steynor & Aristides Kiprakis, 2020. "Experimental Assessment of Flow, Performance, and Loads for Tidal Turbines in a Closely-Spaced Array," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Li, Yangjian & Liu, Hongwei & Lin, Yonggang & Li, Wei & Gu, Yajing, 2019. "Design and test of a 600-kW horizontal-axis tidal current turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 177-186.
    5. Ahmadi, Mohammad H.B. & Yang, Zhiyin, 2020. "The evolution of turbulence characteristics in the wake of a horizontal axis tidal stream turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1008-1015.
    6. Payne, Grégory S. & Stallard, Tim & Martinez, Rodrigo, 2017. "Design and manufacture of a bed supported tidal turbine model for blade and shaft load measurement in turbulent flow and waves," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 312-326.
    7. Bahaj, A.S. & Batten, W.M.J. & McCann, G., 2007. "Experimental verifications of numerical predictions for the hydrodynamic performance of horizontal axis marine current turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(15), pages 2479-2490.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhen Qin & Xiaoran Tang & Yu-Ting Wu & Sung-Ki Lyu, 2022. "Advancement of Tidal Current Generation Technology in Recent Years: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Alyona Naberezhnykh & David Ingram & Ian Ashton & Joel Culina, 2023. "How Applicable Are Turbulence Assumptions Used in the Tidal Energy Industry?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-21, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gambuzza, Stefano & Pisetta, Gabriele & Davey, Thomas & Steynor, Jeffrey & Viola, Ignazio Maria, 2023. "Model-scale experiments of passive pitch control for tidal turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 10-29.
    2. Ilias Gavriilidis & Yuner Huang, 2021. "Finite Element Analysis of Tidal Turbine Blade Subjected to Impact Loads from Sea Animals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Faizan, Muhammad & Badshah, Saeed & Badshah, Mujahid & Haider, Basharat Ali, 2022. "Performance and wake analysis of horizontal axis tidal current turbine using Improved Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 740-752.
    4. Lam, Raymond & Dubon, Sergio Lopez & Sellar, Brian & Vogel, Christopher & Davey, Thomas & Steynor, Jeffrey, 2023. "Temporal and spatial characterisation of tidal blade load variation for structural fatigue testing," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 665-678.
    5. Dong, Yongjun & Guo, Jingfu & Chen, Jianmei & Sun, Chao & Zhu, Wanqiang & Chen, Liwei & Zhang, Xueming, 2021. "Development of a 300 kW horizontal-axis tidal stream energy conversion system with adaptive variable-pitch turbine and direct-drive PMSG," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    6. Zhang, Yuquan & Zang, Wei & Zheng, Jinhai & Cappietti, Lorenzo & Zhang, Jisheng & Zheng, Yuan & Fernandez-Rodriguez, E., 2021. "The influence of waves propagating with the current on the wake of a tidal stream turbine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    7. Perez, Larissa & Cossu, Remo & Grinham, Alistair & Penesis, Irene, 2021. "Seasonality of turbulence characteristics and wave-current interaction in two prospective tidal energy sites," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 1322-1336.
    8. Perez, Larissa & Cossu, Remo & Grinham, Alistair & Penesis, Irene, 2022. "An investigation of tidal turbine performance and loads under various turbulence conditions using Blade Element Momentum theory and high-frequency field data acquired in two prospective tidal energy s," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 928-937.
    9. Badoe, Charles E. & Edmunds, Matt & Williams, Alison J. & Nambiar, Anup & Sellar, Brian & Kiprakis, Aristides & Masters, Ian, 2022. "Robust validation of a generalised actuator disk CFD model for tidal turbine analysis using the FloWave ocean energy research facility," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 232-250.
    10. Zhu, Chengyong & Qiu, Yingning & Wang, Tongguang, 2021. "Dynamic stall of the wind turbine airfoil and blade undergoing pitch oscillations: A comparative study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    11. Myriam Slama & Camille Choma Bex & Grégory Pinon & Michael Togneri & Iestyn Evans, 2021. "Lagrangian Vortex Computations of a Four Tidal Turbine Array: An Example Based on the NEPTHYD Layout in the Alderney Race," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-23, June.
    12. Kennedy, Ciaran R. & Jaksic, Vesna & Leen, Sean B. & Brádaigh, Conchúr M.Ó., 2018. "Fatigue life of pitch- and stall-regulated composite tidal turbine blades," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 688-699.
    13. Fouz, D.M. & Carballo, R. & López, I. & González, X.P. & Iglesias, G., 2023. "A methodology for cost-effective analysis of hydrokinetic energy projects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    14. Li, Binghui & de Queiroz, Anderson Rodrigo & DeCarolis, Joseph F. & Bane, John & He, Ruoying & Keeler, Andrew G. & Neary, Vincent S., 2017. "The economics of electricity generation from Gulf Stream currents," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 649-658.
    15. Roman Gabl & Samuel Draycott & Ajit C. Pillai & Thomas Davey, 2021. "Experimental Data of Bottom Pressure and Free Surface Elevation including Wave and Current Interactions," Data, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-13, September.
    16. Hannah Mullings & Samuel Draycott & Jérôme Thiébot & Sylvain Guillou & Philippe Mercier & Jon Hardwick & Ed Mackay & Philipp Thies & Tim Stallard, 2023. "Evaluation of Model Predictions of the Unsteady Tidal Stream Resource and Turbine Fatigue Loads Relative to Multi-Point Flow Measurements at Raz Blanchard," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-30, October.
    17. Le, Tuyen Quang & Ko, Jin Hwan, 2015. "Effect of hydrofoil flexibility on the power extraction of a flapping tidal generator via two- and three-dimensional flow simulations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 275-285.
    18. Yuquan Zhang & Zhiqiang Liu & Chengyi Li & Xuemei Wang & Yuan Zheng & Zhi Zhang & Emmanuel Fernandez-Rodriguez & Rabea Jamil Mahfoud, 2022. "Fluid–Structure Interaction Modeling of Structural Loads and Fatigue Life Analysis of Tidal Stream Turbine," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-15, October.
    19. Carwyn Frost & Ian Benson & Penny Jeffcoate & Björn Elsäßer & Trevor Whittaker, 2018. "The Effect of Control Strategy on Tidal Stream Turbine Performance in Laboratory and Field Experiments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    20. Zhang, Jisheng & Zhou, Yudi & Lin, Xiangfeng & Wang, Guohui & Guo, Yakun & Chen, Hao, 2022. "Experimental investigation on wake and thrust characteristics of a twin-rotor horizontal axis tidal stream turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 701-715.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:20:p:5389-:d:428658. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.