IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i9p1703-d228497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sugarcane Bagasse Hydrolysis Enhancement by Microwave-Assisted Sulfolane Pretreatment

Author

Listed:
  • Patricia Portero-Barahona

    (CLQCA, Neotropical Centre for the Biomass Research, School of Biological Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador, Avda. 12 de Octubre 1076 y Roca, Quito 170303, Ecuador
    Agriculture and Forestry Engineering Department, ETSIIAA, Universidad de Valladolid, Avenida de Madrid 44, 34004 Palencia, Spain)

  • Enrique Javier Carvajal-Barriga

    (CLQCA, Neotropical Centre for the Biomass Research, School of Biological Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador, Avda. 12 de Octubre 1076 y Roca, Quito 170303, Ecuador)

  • Jesús Martín-Gil

    (Agriculture and Forestry Engineering Department, ETSIIAA, Universidad de Valladolid, Avenida de Madrid 44, 34004 Palencia, Spain)

  • Pablo Martín-Ramos

    (EPS, Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Ciencias Ambientales de Aragón (IUCA), Universidad de Zaragoza, Carretera de Cuarte, s/n, 22071 Huesca, Spain)

Abstract

Sugarcane bagasse is the major by-product of the sugarcane industry and, due to its abundant availability, it has been extensively studied for lignocellulosic bioconversion in the production of bioethanol and other value-added commercial products. In the study presented herein, a combined pretreatment using sulfolane, TiO 2 and alkali microwave irradiation (MW-A) was assessed for the dissolution of lignin prior to enzymatic saccharification of holocellulose. Total reducing sugars (TRS) and saccharinic acid yields were investigated. The increase in NaOH concentration up to 5% and in temperature from 120 °C to 140 °C were found to have a positive influence on both yields. While increasing the reaction time from 5 to 60 min only led to an increase in TRS yield <2%, a reaction time of 30 min almost doubled the saccharinic acids production. TRS yields and saccharinic acid production were approximately 5% and 33% higher when the sulfolane-TiO 2 reaction medium was used, as compared to MW-A in water, reaching up to 64.8% and 15.24 g/L of saccharinic acids, respectively. The proposed MW-A pretreatment may hold promise for industrial applications, given the good TRS yields obtained, and the associated enzyme and time/energy savings. The use of sulfolane-TiO 2 reaction medium is encouraged if saccharinic acids are to be recovered too.

Suggested Citation

  • Patricia Portero-Barahona & Enrique Javier Carvajal-Barriga & Jesús Martín-Gil & Pablo Martín-Ramos, 2019. "Sugarcane Bagasse Hydrolysis Enhancement by Microwave-Assisted Sulfolane Pretreatment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:9:p:1703-:d:228497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/9/1703/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/9/1703/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zabed, H. & Sahu, J.N. & Boyce, A.N. & Faruq, G., 2016. "Fuel ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass: An overview on feedstocks and technological approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 751-774.
    2. Kumar, Mayank & Olajire Oyedun, Adetoyese & Kumar, Amit, 2018. "A review on the current status of various hydrothermal technologies on biomass feedstock," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1742-1770.
    3. Rastogi, Meenal & Shrivastava, Smriti, 2017. "Recent advances in second generation bioethanol production: An insight to pretreatment, saccharification and fermentation processes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 330-340.
    4. Chen, Hongmei & Zhao, Jia & Hu, Tianhang & Zhao, Xuebing & Liu, Dehua, 2015. "A comparison of several organosolv pretreatments for improving the enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw: Substrate digestibility, fermentability and structural features," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 224-232.
    5. Suriyachai, Nopparat & Champreda, Verawat & Sakdaronnarong, Chularat & Shotipruk, Artiwan & Laosiripojana, Navadol, 2017. "Sequential organosolv fractionation/hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse: The coupling use of heterogeneous H3PO4-activated carbon as acid promoter and hydrolysis catalyst," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1141-1148.
    6. Peng, Huadong & Chen, Hongzhang & Qu, Yongshui & Li, Hongqiang & Xu, Jian, 2014. "Bioconversion of different sizes of microcrystalline cellulose pretreated by microwave irradiation with/without NaOH," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 142-148.
    7. Lai, Long Wee & Idris, Ani, 2016. "Comparison of steam-alkali-chemical and microwave-alkali pretreatment for enhancing the enzymatic saccharification of oil palm trunk," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 738-746.
    8. Zhang, Quanguo & Hu, Jianjun & Lee, Duu-Jong, 2017. "Pretreatment of biomass using ionic liquids: Research updates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 77-84.
    9. Singh, Renu & Shukla, Ashish & Tiwari, Sapna & Srivastava, Monika, 2014. "A review on delignification of lignocellulosic biomass for enhancement of ethanol production potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 713-728.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kumar, Bikash & Bhardwaj, Nisha & Verma, Pradeep, 2020. "Microwave assisted transition metal salt and orthophosphoric acid pretreatment systems: Generation of bioethanol and xylo-oligosaccharides," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 574-584.
    2. Huang, Caoxing & Jiang, Xiao & Shen, Xiaojun & Hu, Jinguang & Tang, Wei & Wu, Xinxing & Ragauskas, Arthur & Jameel, Hasan & Meng, Xianzhi & Yong, Qiang, 2022. "Lignin-enzyme interaction: A roadblock for efficient enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng, F. & Brewer, C.E., 2021. "Conversion of protein-rich lignocellulosic wastes to bio-energy: Review and recommendations for hydrolysis + fermentation and anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    2. Rezania, Shahabaldin & Oryani, Bahareh & Cho, Jinwoo & Talaiekhozani, Amirreza & Sabbagh, Farzaneh & Hashemi, Beshare & Rupani, Parveen Fatemeh & Mohammadi, Ali Akbar, 2020. "Different pretreatment technologies of lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol production: An overview," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Rooni, Vahur & Raud, Merlin & Kikas, Timo, 2017. "The freezing pre-treatment of lignocellulosic material: A cheap alternative for Nordic countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1-7.
    4. Ghosh, Shiladitya & Chowdhury, Ranjana & Bhattacharya, Pinaki, 2017. "Sustainability of cereal straws for the fermentative production of second generation biofuels: A review of the efficiency and economics of biochemical pretreatment processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 284-298.
    5. Dong, Chengyu & Wang, Ying & Chan, Ka-Lai & Bhatia, Akanksha & Leu, Shao-Yuan, 2018. "Temperature profiling to maximize energy yield with reduced water input in a lignocellulosic ethanol biorefinery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 63-72.
    6. Halder, Pobitra & Kundu, Sazal & Patel, Savankumar & Setiawan, Adi & Atkin, Rob & Parthasarthy, Rajarathinam & Paz-Ferreiro, Jorge & Surapaneni, Aravind & Shah, Kalpit, 2019. "Progress on the pre-treatment of lignocellulosic biomass employing ionic liquids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 268-292.
    7. Huzir, Nurhamieza Md & Aziz, Md Maniruzzaman A. & Ismail, S.B. & Abdullah, Bawadi & Mahmood, Nik Azmi Nik & Umor, N.A. & Syed Muhammad, Syed Anuar Faua’ad, 2018. "Agro-industrial waste to biobutanol production: Eco-friendly biofuels for next generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 476-485.
    8. Ishtiaq Ahmed & Muhammad Anjum Zia & Huma Afzal & Shaheez Ahmed & Muhammad Ahmad & Zain Akram & Farooq Sher & Hafiz M. N. Iqbal, 2021. "Socio-Economic and Environmental Impacts of Biomass Valorisation: A Strategic Drive for Sustainable Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-32, April.
    9. Melendez, Jesus R. & Mátyás, Bence & Hena, Sufia & Lowy, Daniel A. & El Salous, Ahmed, 2022. "Perspectives in the production of bioethanol: A review of sustainable methods, technologies, and bioprocesses," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    10. Monirul Islam Miskat & Ashfaq Ahmed & Hemal Chowdhury & Tamal Chowdhury & Piyal Chowdhury & Sadiq M. Sait & Young-Kwon Park, 2020. "Assessing the Theoretical Prospects of Bioethanol Production as a Biofuel from Agricultural Residues in Bangladesh: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Ogechukwu Bose Chukwuma & Mohd Rafatullah & Husnul Azan Tajarudin & Norli Ismail, 2020. "Lignocellulolytic Enzymes in Biotechnological and Industrial Processes: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-31, September.
    12. Carrillo-Nieves, Danay & Rostro Alanís, Magdalena J. & de la Cruz Quiroz, Reynaldo & Ruiz, Héctor A. & Iqbal, Hafiz M.N. & Parra-Saldívar, Roberto, 2019. "Current status and future trends of bioethanol production from agro-industrial wastes in Mexico," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 63-74.
    13. Azwifunimunwe Tshikovhi & Tshwafo Ellias Motaung, 2023. "Technologies and Innovations for Biomass Energy Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    14. Li, Yi-Jing & Li, Han-Yin & Sun, Shao-Ni & Sun, Run-Cang, 2019. "Evaluating the efficiency of γ-valerolactone/water/acid system on Eucalyptus pretreatment by confocal Raman microscopy and enzymatic hydrolysis for bioethanol production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 228-234.
    15. de Lucas, Rosymar Coutinho & de Oliveira, Tássio Brito & Lima, Matheus Sanitá & Pasin, Thiago Machado & Scarcella, Ana Sílvia de Almeida & Ribeiro, Liliane Fraga Costa & Carvalho, Caio & Damasio, Andr, 2021. "The profile secretion of Aspergillus clavatus: Different pre-treatments of sugarcane bagasse distinctly induces holocellulases for the lignocellulosic biomass conversion into sugar," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 748-757.
    16. Yang, Guang & Wang, Jianlong, 2018. "Various additives for improving dark fermentative hydrogen production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 130-146.
    17. Genel, Salih & Durak, Halil & Durak, Emre Demirer & Güneş, Hasret & Genel, Yaşar, 2023. "Hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass with molybdenum, aluminum, cobalt metal powder catalysts and evaluation of wastewater by fungus cultivation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 20-32.
    18. Liu, Zhanglin & Wan, Xue & Wang, Qing & Tian, Dong & Hu, Jinguang & Huang, Mei & Shen, Fei & Zeng, Yongmei, 2021. "Performances of a multi-product strategy for bioethanol, lignin, and ultra-high surface area carbon from lignocellulose by PHP (phosphoric acid plus hydrogen peroxide) pretreatment platform," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    19. Jin, Wenxiang & Chen, Ling & Hu, Meng & Sun, Dan & Li, Ao & Li, Ying & Hu, Zhen & Zhou, Shiguang & Tu, Yuanyuan & Xia, Tao & Wang, Yanting & Xie, Guosheng & Li, Yanbin & Bai, Baowei & Peng, Liangcai, 2016. "Tween-80 is effective for enhancing steam-exploded biomass enzymatic saccharification and ethanol production by specifically lessening cellulase absorption with lignin in common reed," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 82-90.
    20. Ko, Ja Kyong & Lee, Jae Hoon & Jung, Je Hyeong & Lee, Sun-Mi, 2020. "Recent advances and future directions in plant and yeast engineering to improve lignocellulosic biofuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:9:p:1703-:d:228497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.