IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i19p3700-d271561.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential Reductions in Greenhouse Gas and Fine Particulate Matter Emissions Using Corn Stover for Ethanol Production in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Yang

    (College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
    Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA)

  • Ji-Qin Ni

    (Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA)

  • Weiqing Bao

    (College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Lei Zhao

    (Symbior Biocrude Limited, Hong Kong 999077, China)

  • Guang Hui Xie

    (College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

Abstract

Corn stover is an abundant raw material that can be used to produce ethanol and reduce air pollution. This paper studied the potential reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) and fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) emissions across China if corn stover was used for ethanol production. Field surveys in nine provincial regions were conducted. Life-cycle assessment (LCA) was used to assess the GHG and PM 2.5 emissions from a corn stover based ethanol system. The LCA system boundaries included several process stages from corn planting to ethanol fuel used in vehicles. Corn stover geographical distributions and emission reduction factors were combined. Results showed that the total surplus quantity of corn stover in China was 86.2 million metric tons (Mt) in 2015. It was sufficient to reach the ethanol production target set by the Chinese government. In the scenario that 38.5 Mt or 44.6% of corn stover surplus were used for ethanol production, the total potential emission reductions were 36.5 Mt CO 2 -eq GHG and 450.9 kt PM 2.5 . Among the 31 provincial regions in China, the reduction potentials varied from 0.001 to 8.9 Mt CO 2 -eq for GHG and from 0.013 to 109.7 kt for PM 2.5 . This study provided useful information to policy makers, researchers and industry managers who work on environmental control and corn stover management.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Yang & Ji-Qin Ni & Weiqing Bao & Lei Zhao & Guang Hui Xie, 2019. "Potential Reductions in Greenhouse Gas and Fine Particulate Matter Emissions Using Corn Stover for Ethanol Production in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:19:p:3700-:d:271561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/19/3700/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/19/3700/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zheng, Bo & Zhang, Qiang & Borken-Kleefeld, Jens & Huo, Hong & Guan, Dabo & Klimont, Zbigniew & Peters, Glen P. & He, Kebin, 2015. "How will greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles be constrained in China around 2030?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 230-240.
    2. Zhao, Yan & Damgaard, Anders & Xu, Yingjie & Liu, Shan & Christensen, Thomas H., 2019. "Bioethanol from corn stover – Global warming footprint of alternative biotechnologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 237-253.
    3. Zhao, Lili & Ou, Xunmin & Chang, Shiyan, 2016. "Life-cycle greenhouse gas emission and energy use of bioethanol produced from corn stover in China: Current perspectives and future prospectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 303-313.
    4. McKechnie, Jon & Pourbafrani, Mohammad & Saville, Bradley A. & MacLean, Heather L., 2015. "Exploring impacts of process technology development and regional factors on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of corn stover ethanol," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 726-734.
    5. Chen, Xiaoguang, 2016. "Economic potential of biomass supply from crop residues in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 141-149.
    6. Song, Junnian & Yang, Wei & Higano, Yoshiro & Wang, Xian’en, 2015. "Dynamic integrated assessment of bioenergy technologies for energy production utilizing agricultural residues: An input–output approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 178-189.
    7. Trivedi, Abhinav & Verma, Amit Ranjan & Kaur, Supreet & Jha, Bhaskar & Vijay, Vandit & Chandra, Ram & Vijay, Virendra Kumar & Subbarao, P.M.V. & Tiwari, Ratnesh & Hariprasad, P. & Prasad, Rajendra, 2017. "Sustainable bio-energy production models for eradicating open field burning of paddy straw in Punjab, India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 310-317.
    8. Dong, Huijuan & Dai, Hancheng & Dong, Liang & Fujita, Tsuyoshi & Geng, Yong & Klimont, Zbigniew & Inoue, Tsuyoshi & Bunya, Shintaro & Fujii, Minoru & Masui, Toshihiko, 2015. "Pursuing air pollutant co-benefits of CO2 mitigation in China: A provincial leveled analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 165-174.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ning Sun & Chunyu Gao & Yahui Ding & Yuyun Bi & Patience Afi Seglah & Yajing Wang, 2022. "Five-Dimensional Straw Utilization Model and Its Impact on Carbon Emission Reduction in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Yan & Damgaard, Anders & Xu, Yingjie & Liu, Shan & Christensen, Thomas H., 2019. "Bioethanol from corn stover – Global warming footprint of alternative biotechnologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 237-253.
    2. Weiwei Wang, 2023. "Integrated Assessment of Economic Supply and Environmental Effects of Biomass Co-Firing in Coal Power Plants: A Case Study of Jiangsu, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Zhang, Jiaqi & Li, Yu'e & Cai, Andong & Oosterveer, Peter & Greene, Mary & Wang, Bin, 2023. "Greenhouse gas reduction through crop residue-based bioenergy: A meta-analysis of reduction efficiency and abatement costs of various products," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    4. Li, Junjie & Zhang, Yueling & Yang, Yanli & Zhang, Xiaomei & Wang, Nana & Zheng, Yonghong & Tian, Yajun & Xie, Kechang, 2022. "Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of ethanol production via coal and its competitors: A comparative study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    5. Zuo, Alec & Hou, Lingling & Huang, Zeying, 2020. "How does farmers' current usage of crop straws influence the willingness-to-accept price to sell?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    6. Li, Yanmei & Cui, Yifei & Cai, Bofeng & Guo, Jingpeng & Cheng, Tianhai & Zheng, Fengjie, 2020. "Spatial characteristics of CO2 emissions and PM2.5 concentrations in China based on gridded data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    7. Yongsheng Lin & Zhe Liu & Rui Liu & Xiaoman Yu & Liming Zhang, 2020. "Uncovering driving forces of co-benefits achieved by eco-industrial development strategies at the scale of industrial park," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(2), pages 275-290, March.
    8. Soam, Shveta & Kapoor, Manali & Kumar, Ravindra & Borjesson, Pal & Gupta, Ravi P. & Tuli, Deepak K., 2016. "Global warming potential and energy analysis of second generation ethanol production from rice straw in India," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 353-364.
    9. Peng, Tianduo & Ou, Xunmin & Yuan, Zhiyi & Yan, Xiaoyu & Zhang, Xiliang, 2018. "Development and application of China provincial road transport energy demand and GHG emissions analysis model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 313-328.
    10. Espinoza Pérez, Andrea Teresa & Camargo, Mauricio & Narváez Rincón, Paulo César & Alfaro Marchant, Miguel, 2017. "Key challenges and requirements for sustainable and industrialized biorefinery supply chain design and management: A bibliographic analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 350-359.
    11. Zhao, Yuhuan & Shi, Qiaoling & li, Hao & Qian, Zhiling & Zheng, Lu & Wang, Song & He, Yizhang, 2022. "Simulating the economic and environmental effects of integrated policies in energy-carbon-water nexus of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    12. Song, Hongqing & Ou, Xunmin & Yuan, Jiehui & Yu, Mingxu & Wang, Cheng, 2017. "Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of diesel/LNG heavy-duty vehicle fleets in China based on a bottom-up model analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 966-978.
    13. Ru Fang, Yan & Zhang, Silu & Zhou, Ziqiao & Shi, Wenjun & Hui Xie, Guang, 2022. "Sustainable development in China: Valuation of bioenergy potential and CO2 reduction from crop straw," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    14. Xiaoshu Cao & Shishu OuYang & Dan Liu & Wenyue Yang, 2019. "Spatiotemporal Patterns and Decomposition Analysis of CO 2 Emissions from Transportation in the Pearl River Delta," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Haijun Zhao & Weichun Ma & Hongjia Dong & Ping Jiang, 2017. "Analysis of Co-Effects on Air Pollutants and CO 2 Emissions Generated by End-of-Pipe Measures of Pollution Control in China’s Coal-Fired Power Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, March.
    16. Wang, Changbo & Zhang, Lixiao & Chang, Yuan & Pang, Mingyue, 2021. "Energy return on investment (EROI) of biomass conversion systems in China: Meta-analysis focused on system boundary unification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    17. Huiling Wang & Jiaxin Luo & Mengtian Zhang & Yue Ling, 2022. "The Impact of Transportation Restructuring on the Intensity of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Empirical Data from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-16, October.
    18. Zhongyao Cai & Xiaohui Yang & Huaxing Lin & Xinyu Yang & Ping Jiang, 2022. "Study on the Co-Benefits of Air Pollution Control and Carbon Reduction in the Yellow River Basin: An Assessment Based on a Spatial Econometric Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-15, April.
    19. Cameron Hepburn & Brian O’Callaghan & Nicholas Stern & Joseph Stiglitz & Dimitri Zenghelis, 2020. "Will COVID-19 fiscal recovery packages accelerate or retard progress on climate change?," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 36(Supplemen), pages 359-381.
    20. Cao, Chaoji & Cui, XueQin & Cai, Wenjia & Wang, Can & Xing, Lu & Zhang, Ning & Shen, Shudong & Bai, Yuqi & Deng, Zhu, 2019. "Incorporating health co-benefits into regional carbon emission reduction policy making: A case study of China’s power sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:19:p:3700-:d:271561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.