IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i17p3265-d260698.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on the Improvement of the Evaluation Scale of Discomfort Glare in Educational Facilities

Author

Listed:
  • Sewon Lee

    (Research Institute of Science and Technology, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, Korea)

  • Kyung Sun Lee

    (School of Architecture, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, Korea)

Abstract

The lighting environment is a factor that significantly affects the physical and psychological aspects of occupants of a building. In particular, educational facilities should be designed to provide adequate natural lighting because it has a profound impact on students’ health and learning performance. Although environmental certification systems include evaluation items for improving the indoor light environment, there is a lack of evaluation criteria regarding the corresponding issue of glare. Therefore, this study aims to help visualize areas where indoor glare problems occur, and to improve the evaluation scale of discomfort glare in environmental certification systems. A standard high school classroom in Seoul was analyzed to study glare issues in the educational space. DIVA for Rhino—Grasshopper, a light environment simulation program based on Radiance and DAYSIM program, was used to obtain reliable light analysis simulation results, and the daylight glare probability ( DGP ) measure was used to calculate discomfort glare. The results of the simulation and analysis suggest this is a method for improving glare evaluation measures that are lacking in indoor environmental certification standards. The visualized frequency of discomfort glare data is useful for planning the layout of the indoor space, opening, and shading design of a building to prevent glare problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Sewon Lee & Kyung Sun Lee, 2019. "A Study on the Improvement of the Evaluation Scale of Discomfort Glare in Educational Facilities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:17:p:3265-:d:260698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/17/3265/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/17/3265/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kyung Sun Lee & Ki Jun Han & Jae Wook Lee, 2016. "Feasibility Study on Parametric Optimization of Daylighting in Building Shading Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Carlucci, Salvatore & Causone, Francesco & De Rosa, Francesco & Pagliano, Lorenzo, 2015. "A review of indices for assessing visual comfort with a view to their use in optimization processes to support building integrated design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 1016-1033.
    3. Yu-Sheng Huang & Wei-Cheng Luo & Hsiang-Chen Wang & Shih-Wei Feng & Chie-Tong Kuo & Chia-Mei Lu, 2017. "How Smart LEDs Lighting Benefit Color Temperature and Luminosity Transformation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-13, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amir Faraji & Maria Rashidi & Fatemeh Rezaei & Payam Rahnamayiezekavat, 2023. "A Meta-Synthesis Review of Occupant Comfort Assessment in Buildings (2002–2022)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-36, February.
    2. Yunsong Han & Hong Yu & Cheng Sun, 2017. "Simulation-Based Multiobjective Optimization of Timber-Glass Residential Buildings in Severe Cold Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Cui Li & Xuyun Yu & Zhengrong Li & Yi Zhao & Yuxin Liu & Xiangchao Lian & Yanbo Feng & Han Zhu, 2022. "Method for Determining Sensor Location for Automated Shading Control in Office Building," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Roberta Moschetti & Shabnam Homaei & Ellika Taveres-Cachat & Steinar Grynning, 2022. "Assessing Responsive Building Envelope Designs through Robustness-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Zero-Emission Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.
    5. Pilechiha, Peiman & Mahdavinejad, Mohammadjavad & Pour Rahimian, Farzad & Carnemolla, Phillippa & Seyedzadeh, Saleh, 2020. "Multi-objective optimisation framework for designing office windows: quality of view, daylight and energy efficiency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    6. Marchini, F. & Chiatti, C. & Fabiani, C. & Pisello, A.L., 2023. "Development of an innovative translucent–photoluminescent coating for smart windows applications: An experimental and numerical investigation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    7. Ikuzwe, Alice & Ye, Xianming & Xia, Xiaohua, 2020. "Energy-maintenance optimization for retrofitted lighting system incorporating luminous flux degradation to enhance visual comfort," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    8. Qing Yang & Nianping Li, 2022. "Subjective and Objective Evaluation of Shading on Thermal, Visual, and Acoustic Properties of Indoor Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    9. Fabrizio M. Amoruso & Udo Dietrich & Thorsten Schuetze, 2019. "Integrated BIM-Parametric Workflow-Based Analysis of Daylight Improvement for Sustainable Renovation of an Exemplary Apartment in Seoul, Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-29, May.
    10. Vincenzo Costanzo & Gianpiero Evola & Luigi Marletta & Fabiana Pistone Nascone, 2018. "Application of Climate Based Daylight Modelling to the Refurbishment of a School Building in Sicily," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, July.
    11. Krzysztof Baran & Antoni Różowicz & Henryk Wachta & Sebastian Różowicz, 2020. "Modeling of Selected Lighting Parameters of LED Panel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.
    12. Sehar, Fakeha & Pipattanasomporn, Manisa & Rahman, Saifur, 2016. "An energy management model to study energy and peak power savings from PV and storage in demand responsive buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 406-417.
    13. Xianfeng Huang & Shangyou Wei & Shangyu Zhu, 2020. "Study on Daylighting Optimization in the Exhibition Halls of Museums for Chinese Calligraphy and Painting Works," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, January.
    14. Gabriele Lobaccaro & Salvatore Carlucci & Erica Löfström, 2016. "A Review of Systems and Technologies for Smart Homes and Smart Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-33, May.
    15. Baloch, Ashfaque Ahmed & Shaikh, Pervez Hameed & Shaikh, Faheemullah & Leghari, Zohaib Hussain & Mirjat, Nayyar Hussain & Uqaili, Muhammad Aslam, 2018. "Simulation tools application for artificial lighting in buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3007-3026.
    16. Sánchez-Pantoja, Núria & Vidal, Rosario & Pastor, M. Carmen, 2018. "Aesthetic impact of solar energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 227-238.
    17. Vassiliades, Constantinos & Michael, Aimilios & Savvides, Andreas & Kalogirou, Soteris, 2018. "Improvement of passive behaviour of existing buildings through the integration of active solar energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1178-1192.
    18. Paulína Šujanová & Monika Rychtáriková & Tiago Sotto Mayor & Affan Hyder, 2019. "A Healthy, Energy-Efficient and Comfortable Indoor Environment, a Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-37, April.
    19. In-Tae Kim & Yu-Sin Kim & Meeryoung Cho & Hyeonggon Nam & Anseop Choi & Taeyon Hwang, 2019. "High-Performance Accuracy of Daylight-Responsive Dimming Systems with Illuminance by Distant Luminaires for Energy-Saving Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    20. Zhi Ting Ye & Chin Lung Chen & Lung-Chien Chen & Ching Ho Tien & Hong Thai Nguyen & Hsiang-Chen Wang, 2019. "Hollow Light Guide Module Involving Mini Light-Emitting Diodes for Asymmetric Luminous Planar Illuminators," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-12, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:17:p:3265-:d:260698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.