IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i8p2049-d162386.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improvement of the Response Speed for Switched Reluctance Generation System Based on Modified PT Control

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoshu Zan

    (Jiangsu Province Laboratory of Mining Electric and Automation, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Mingliang Cui

    (Jiangsu Province Laboratory of Mining Electric and Automation, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Dongsheng Yu

    (Jiangsu Province Laboratory of Mining Electric and Automation, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Ruidong Xu

    (Jiangsu Province Laboratory of Mining Electric and Automation, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Kai Ni

    (Department of Electrical engineering & Electronic, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK)

Abstract

The Switched Reluctance Generator (SRG) is suitable for wind power generation due to its good reliability and robustness. However, The SRG system adopting the conventional control algorithm with Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) method has a drawback, low response speed. The pulse train (PT) control has been widely used in dc/dc power converters operating in the discontinuous conduction mode due to its advantages of simple implementation and fast response. In this paper, for the first time, the PT control method is modified and adopted for controlling the output voltage of SRG system in order to achieve fast response. The capacitor current on the output side is sampled and combined with the output voltage to select the pulse trains and the low frequency oscillation cased by PT can be suppressed by tuning the feedback coefficient of the capacitor current. Also, good performance can be guaranteed with a wide range of voltage regulations, fast response, and no overshoot. The experimental platform of an 8/6 SRG system is built, and the experimental results show that the PT control can be used for SRG system with good practicability.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoshu Zan & Mingliang Cui & Dongsheng Yu & Ruidong Xu & Kai Ni, 2018. "Improvement of the Response Speed for Switched Reluctance Generation System Based on Modified PT Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:8:p:2049-:d:162386
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/8/2049/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/8/2049/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhao, Zhen Yu & Hu, Ji & Zuo, Jian, 2009. "Performance of wind power industry development in China: A DiamondModel study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2883-2891.
    2. Liu, Yuanxin & Ren, Lingzhi & Li, Yanbin & Zhao, Xin-gang, 2015. "The industrial performance of wind power industry in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 644-655.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zeineb Touati & Manuel Pereira & Rui Esteves Araújo & Adel Khedher, 2022. "Integration of Switched Reluctance Generator in a Wind Energy Conversion System: An Overview of the State of the Art and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-25, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Zhen-yu & Tian, Yu-xi & Zillante, George, 2014. "Modeling and evaluation of the wind power industry chain: A China study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 397-406.
    2. Mostafaeipour, Ali, 2010. "Productivity and development issues of global wind turbine industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 1048-1058, April.
    3. Pei-Hsuan Tsai & Chih-Jou Chen & Ho-Chin Yang, 2021. "Using Porter’s Diamond Model to Assess the Competitiveness of Taiwan’s Solar Photovoltaic Industry," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    4. Mao, Guozhu & Liu, Xi & Du, Huibin & Zuo, Jian & Wang, Linyuan, 2015. "Way forward for alternative energy research: A bibliometric analysis during 1994–2013," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 276-286.
    5. Abbas Mardani & Dalia Streimikiene & Tomas Balezentis & Muhamad Zameri Mat Saman & Khalil Md Nor & Seyed Meysam Khoshnava, 2018. "Data Envelopment Analysis in Energy and Environmental Economics: An Overview of the State-of-the-Art and Recent Development Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Zhang, Pan, 2019. "Do energy intensity targets matter for wind energy development? Identifying their heterogeneous effects in Chinese provinces with different wind resources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 968-975.
    7. Lin, Boqiang & Chen, Yufang, 2019. "Impacts of policies on innovation in wind power technologies in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 682-691.
    8. Grafström, Jonas, 2019. "Public policy failures related to China´s Wind Power Development," Ratio Working Papers 320, The Ratio Institute.
    9. Zhao, Zhen-Yu & Chang, Rui-Dong & Chen, Yu-Long, 2016. "What hinder the further development of wind power in China?—A socio-technical barrier study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 465-476.
    10. Zhao, Zhen-Yu & Zuo, Jian & Fan, Lei-Lei & Zillante, George, 2011. "Impacts of renewable energy regulations on the structure of power generation in China – A critical analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 24-30.
    11. Komarov, Dragan & Stupar, Slobodan & Simonović, Aleksandar & Stanojević, Marija, 2012. "Prospects of wind energy sector development in Serbia with relevant regulatory framework overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2618-2630.
    12. Fan, Xiao-chao & Wang, Wei-qing, 2016. "Spatial patterns and influencing factors of China׳s wind turbine manufacturing industry: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 482-496.
    13. Zhao, Zhen Yu & Zuo, Jian & Feng, Tian Tian & Zillante, George, 2011. "International cooperation on renewable energy development in China – A critical analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1105-1110.
    14. Zifa Liu & Wenhua Zhang & Changhong Zhao & Jiahai Yuan, 2015. "The Economics of Wind Power in China and Policy Implications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-18, February.
    15. Essah, Marcellinus & Andrews, Nathan, 2016. "Linking or de-linking sustainable mining practices and corporate social responsibility? Insights from Ghana," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 75-85.
    16. Toshiyuki Sueyoshi & Mika Goto, 2017. "World trend in energy: an extension to DEA applied to energy and environment," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, December.
    17. Yuan Zhou & Meijuan Pan & Frauke Urban, 2018. "Comparing the International Knowledge Flow of China’s Wind and Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Industries: Patent Analysis and Implications for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-34, June.
    18. Zhou, Yuanchun & Zhang, Bing & Zou, Ji & Bi, Jun & Wang, Ke, 2012. "Joint R&D in low-carbon technology development in China: A case study of the wind-turbine manufacturing industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 100-108.
    19. Fang, Kai & Zhou, Yunheng & Wang, Shuang & Ye, Ruike & Guo, Sujian, 2018. "Assessing national renewable energy competitiveness of the G20: A revised Porter's Diamond Model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 719-731.
    20. Zeng, Ming & Yang, Yongqi & Wang, Lihua & Sun, Jinghui, 2016. "The power industry reform in China 2015: Policies, evaluations and solutions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 94-110.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:8:p:2049-:d:162386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.