IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i4p744-d137972.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability Assessment of Wind Farm Electrical System Based on a Probability Transfer Technique

Author

Listed:
  • Hejun Yang

    (School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China)

  • Lei Wang

    (School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China)

  • Yeyu Zhang

    (School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China)

  • Xianjun Qi

    (School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China)

  • Lei Wang

    (School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China)

  • Hongbin Wu

    (School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China)

Abstract

The electrical system of a wind farm has a significant influence on the wind farm reliability and electrical energy yield. The disconnect switch installed in an electrical system cannot only improve the operating flexibility, but also enhance the reliability for a wind farm. Therefore, this paper develops a probabilistic transfer technique for integrating the electrical topology structure, the isolation operation of disconnect switch, and stochastic failure of electrical equipment into the reliability assessment of wind farm electrical system. Firstly, as the traditional two-state reliability model of electrical equipment cannot consider the isolation operation, so the paper develops a three-state reliability model to replace the two-state model for incorporating the isolation operation. In addition, a proportion apportion technique is presented to evaluate the state probability. Secondly, this paper develops a probabilistic transfer technique based on the thoughts that through transfer the unreliability of electrical system to the energy transmission interruption of wind turbine generators (WTGs). Finally, some novel indices for describing the reliability of wind farm electrical system are designed, and the variance coefficient of the designed indices is used as a convergence criterion to determine the termination of the assessment process. The proposed technique is applied to the reliability assessment of a wind farm with the different topologies. The simulation results show that the proposed techniques are effective in practical applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Hejun Yang & Lei Wang & Yeyu Zhang & Xianjun Qi & Lei Wang & Hongbin Wu, 2018. "Reliability Assessment of Wind Farm Electrical System Based on a Probability Transfer Technique," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:4:p:744-:d:137972
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/4/744/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/4/744/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hamouda, Yasmina Abdellatif, 2012. "Wind energy in Egypt: Economic feasibility for Cairo," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 3312-3319.
    2. MirHassani, S.A. & Yarahmadi, A., 2017. "Wind farm layout optimization under uncertainty," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 288-297.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pedro Vieira & Mauro Rosa & Leonardo Bremermann & Erika Pequeno & Sandy Miranda, 2020. "Long-term Static and Operational Reserves Assessment Considering Operating and Market Agreements Representation to Multi-Area Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Fernando Manuel Carvalho da Silva Santos & Leonardo Elizeire Bremermann & Tadeu Da Mata Medeiros Branco & Diego Issicaba & Mauro Augusto da Rosa, 2018. "Impact Evaluation of Wind Power Geographic Dispersion on Future Operating Reserve Needs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, October.
    3. Jinming Jiang & Xindong Wei & Weijun Gao & Soichiro Kuroki & Zhonghui Liu, 2018. "Reliability and Maintenance Prioritization Analysis of Combined Cooling, Heating and Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. El Alimi, Souheil & Maatallah, Taher & Dahmouni, Anouar Wajdi & Ben Nasrallah, Sassi, 2012. "Modeling and investigation of the wind resource in the gulf of Tunis, Tunisia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 5466-5478.
    2. Nicolas Kirchner-Bossi & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2018. "Realistic Wind Farm Layout Optimization through Genetic Algorithms Using a Gaussian Wake Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-26, November.
    3. Nicolas Kirchner-Bossi & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2021. "Wind Farm Area Shape Optimization Using Newly Developed Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-25, July.
    4. Murthy, K.S.R. & Rahi, O.P., 2017. "A comprehensive review of wind resource assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1320-1342.
    5. Song, Jeonghwan & Kim, Taewan & You, Donghyun, 2023. "Particle swarm optimization of a wind farm layout with active control of turbine yaws," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 738-747.
    6. Sakka, Evelyn G. & Bilionis, Dimitrios V. & Vamvatsikos, Dimitrios & Gantes, Charis J., 2020. "Onshore wind farm siting prioritization based on investment profitability for Greece," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2827-2839.
    7. Azlan, F. & Kurnia, J.C. & Tan, B.T. & Ismadi, M.-Z., 2021. "Review on optimisation methods of wind farm array under three classical wind condition problems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    8. Wang, Longyan & Zuo, Ming J. & Xu, Jian & Zhou, Yunkai & Tan, Andy C., 2019. "Optimizing wind farm layout by addressing energy-variance trade-off: A single-objective optimization approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    9. Nordman, Erik E., 2014. "Energy transitions in Kenya's tea sector: A wind energy assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 505-514.
    10. Navid Goudarzi & Kasra Mohammadi & Alexandra St. Pé & Ruben Delgado & Weidong Zhu, 2020. "Wind Resource Assessment and Economic Viability of Conventional and Unconventional Small Wind Turbines: A Case Study of Maryland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-15, November.
    11. Sachin Kumar & Kumari Sarita & Akanksha Singh S Vardhan & Rajvikram Madurai Elavarasan & R. K. Saket & Narottam Das, 2020. "Reliability Assessment of Wind-Solar PV Integrated Distribution System Using Electrical Loss Minimization Technique," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-30, October.
    12. Masoudi, Seiied Mohsen & Baneshi, Mehdi, 2022. "Layout optimization of a wind farm considering grids of various resolutions, wake effect, and realistic wind speed and wind direction data: A techno-economic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    13. Kyoungboo Yang & Kyungho Cho, 2019. "Simulated Annealing Algorithm for Wind Farm Layout Optimization: A Benchmark Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-15, November.
    14. Yang, Kyoungboo & Kwak, Gyeongil & Cho, Kyungho & Huh, Jongchul, 2019. "Wind farm layout optimization for wake effect uniformity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 983-995.
    15. Shaaban, S. & Albatal, A. & Mohamed, M.H., 2018. "Optimization of H-Rotor Darrieus turbines' mutual interaction in staggered arrangements," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 87-99.
    16. Reddy, Sohail R., 2020. "Wind Farm Layout Optimization (WindFLO) : An advanced framework for fast wind farm analysis and optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:4:p:744-:d:137972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.