IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i11p3006-d179978.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Underground Diesel Exhaust Wet Scrubbers: Current Status and Future Prospects

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Adeeb Abdulwahid

    (College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia
    Engineering Department, AL-Nahrain University, Baghdad 10072, Iraq)

  • Rong Situ

    (College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia)

  • Richard J. Brown

    (Biofuel Engine Research Facility, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia)

Abstract

Diesel engines release a range of harmful components into the environment in the form of gases, liquids, and particulate matter (PM). These components have a direct and indirect impact on human health and climate change. Wet scrubbers are used to clean diesel exhaust emissions, by bubbling them through a liquid (usually water) to reduce their temperature and remove some soluble components and particles. Then, these emissions pass through a filter to remove further diesel particulate matter. The PM-capturing mechanism, heat transfer mechanism, and fluid mechanism of a wet scrubber are reviewed. Several parameters have a major influence on wet scrubber performance, such as inlet gas velocity. Modeling of a wet scrubber can be conducted through thermodynamics analysis, heat transfer analysis, and computational simulation. These investigations may lead to optimizing wet scrubber performance, and then to reducing both humidity and temperature at the scrubber exit. This humidity reduction increases filter life and reduces maintenance costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Adeeb Abdulwahid & Rong Situ & Richard J. Brown, 2018. "Underground Diesel Exhaust Wet Scrubbers: Current Status and Future Prospects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:11:p:3006-:d:179978
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/11/3006/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/11/3006/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amilcar Machulek Jr. & Frank Herbert Quina & Fabio Gozzi & Volnir O. Silva & Leidi C. Friedrich & Jose E. F. Moraes, 2012. "Fundamental Mechanistic Studies of the Photo-Fenton Reaction for the Degradation of Organic Pollutants," Chapters, in: Tomasz Puzyn & Aleksandra Mostrag (ed.), Organic Pollutants Ten Years After the Stockholm Convention - Environmental and Analytical Update, IntechOpen.
    2. Shiv Prasad & Dhanya M S, 2011. "Air Quality and Biofuels," Chapters, in: Marco Aurelio Dos Santos Bernardes (ed.), Environmental Impact of Biofuels, IntechOpen.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M. I. Lamas & C. G. Rodriguez, 2019. "NOx Reduction in Diesel-Hydrogen Engines Using Different Strategies of Ammonia Injection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-13, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hoekman, S. Kent & Broch, Amber & Liu, Xiaowei (Vivian), 2018. "Environmental implications of higher ethanol production and use in the U.S.: A literature review. Part I – Impacts on water, soil, and air quality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 3140-3158.
    2. Abdul Haseeb Khan Babar & Yousaf Ali & Amin Ullah Khan, 2021. "Moving toward green mobility: overview and analysis of electric vehicle selection, Pakistan a case in point," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 10994-11011, July.
    3. Weixun Lv & Yan Wu & Jianbin Zang, 2021. "A Review on the Dispersion and Distribution Characteristics of Pollutants in Street Canyons and Improvement Measures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Clovis Zapata & Paul Nieuwenhuis, 2009. "Driving on liquid sunshine – the Brazilian biofuel experience: a policy driven analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(8), pages 528-541, December.
    5. Turney, Damon & Fthenakis, Vasilis, 2011. "Environmental impacts from the installation and operation of large-scale solar power plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 3261-3270, August.
    6. Ji, Xi & Liu, Yifang & Meng, Jing & Wu, Xudong, 2020. "Global supply chain of biomass use and the shift of environmental welfare from primary exploiters to final consumers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    7. Filoso, Solange & Carmo, Janaina Braga do & Mardegan, Sílvia Fernanda & Lins, Silvia Rafaela Machado & Gomes, Taciana Figueiredo & Martinelli, Luiz Antonio, 2015. "Reassessing the environmental impacts of sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil to help meet sustainability goals," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1847-1856.
    8. Rastogi, Rajesh P. & Pandey, Ashok & Larroche, Christian & Madamwar, Datta, 2018. "Algal Green Energy – R&D and technological perspectives for biodiesel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2946-2969.
    9. Gasparatos, Alexandros & Doll, Christopher N.H. & Esteban, Miguel & Ahmed, Abubakari & Olang, Tabitha A., 2017. "Renewable energy and biodiversity: Implications for transitioning to a Green Economy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 161-184.
    10. Joshua M. Pearce, 2019. "Towards Quantifiable Metrics Warranting Industry-Wide Corporate Death Penalties," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-13, February.
    11. Aniello Falciano & Alessio Cimini & Paolo Masi & Mauro Moresi, 2022. "Carbon Footprint of a Typical Neapolitan Pizzeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, March.
    12. Finco, A. & Bentivoglio, D. & Nijkamp, P., 2011. "Integrated evaluation of biofuel production options in agriculture: An exploration of sustainable policy scenarios," Serie Research Memoranda 0035, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    13. Prehoda, Emily W. & Pearce, Joshua M., 2017. "Potential lives saved by replacing coal with solar photovoltaic electricity production in the U.S," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 710-715.
    14. Fekadu Mosisa Wako & Gianmaria Pio & Ernesto Salzano, 2021. "Laminar Burning Velocity and Ignition Delay Time of Oxygenated Biofuel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.
    15. Acheampong, Michael & Ertem, Funda Cansu & Kappler, Benjamin & Neubauer, Peter, 2017. "In pursuit of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) number 7: Will biofuels be reliable?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 927-937.
    16. Ahmed, Tariq & Kumar, Prashant & Mottet, Laetitia, 2021. "Natural ventilation in warm climates: The challenges of thermal comfort, heatwave resilience and indoor air quality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    17. Daniela Dias & António Pais Antunes & Oxana Tchepel, 2019. "Modelling of Emissions and Energy Use from Biofuel Fuelled Vehicles at Urban Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, May.
    18. Mohr, Alison & Raman, Sujatha, 2013. "Lessons from first generation biofuels and implications for the sustainability appraisal of second generation biofuels," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 114-122.
    19. Holland, Robert A. & Scott, Kate & Hinton, Emma D. & Austen, Melanie C. & Barrett, John & Beaumont, Nicola & Blaber-Wegg, Tina & Brown, Gareth & Carter-Silk, Eleanor & Cazenave, Pierre & Eigenbrod, Fe, 2016. "Bridging the gap between energy and the environment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 181-189.
    20. Živković, Snežana B. & Veljković, Milan V. & Banković-Ilić, Ivana B. & Krstić, Ivan M. & Konstantinović, Sandra S. & Ilić, Slavica B. & Avramović, Jelena M. & Stamenković, Olivera S. & Veljković, Vlad, 2017. "Technological, technical, economic, environmental, social, human health risk, toxicological and policy considerations of biodiesel production and use," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 222-247.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:11:p:3006-:d:179978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.