IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i7p852-d102838.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Data-Driven, Cooperative Approach for Wind Farm Control: A Wind Tunnel Experimentation

Author

Listed:
  • Jinkyoo Park

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34141, Korea)

  • Soon-Duck Kwon

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju 5896, Korea)

  • Kincho Law

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA)

Abstract

This paper discusses a data-driven, cooperative control strategy to maximize wind farm power production. Conventionally, every wind turbine in a wind farm is operated to maximize its own power production without taking into account the interactions between the wind turbines in a wind farm. Because of wake interference, such greedy control strategy can significantly lower the power production of the downstream wind turbines and, thus, reduce the overall wind farm power production. As an alternative to the greedy control strategy, we study a cooperative wind farm control strategy that determines and executes the optimum coordinated control actions for maximizing the total wind farm power production. To determine the optimum coordinated control actions of the wind turbines, we employ a data-driven optimization method that seeks to find the optimum control actions using only the power measurement data collected from the wind turbines in a wind farm. In particular, we employ the Bayesian Ascent (BA) algorithm, a probabilistic optimization method constructed based on Gaussian Process regression and the trust region concept. Wind tunnel experiments using 6 scaled wind turbine models are conducted to assess (1) the effectiveness of the cooperative control strategy in improving the power production; and (2) the efficiency of the BA algorithm in determining the optimum control actions of the wind turbines using only the input control actions and the output power measurement data.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinkyoo Park & Soon-Duck Kwon & Kincho Law, 2017. "A Data-Driven, Cooperative Approach for Wind Farm Control: A Wind Tunnel Experimentation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:7:p:852-:d:102838
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/7/852/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/7/852/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fleming, Paul A. & Gebraad, Pieter M.O. & Lee, Sang & van Wingerden, Jan-Willem & Johnson, Kathryn & Churchfield, Matt & Michalakes, John & Spalart, Philippe & Moriarty, Patrick, 2014. "Evaluating techniques for redirecting turbine wakes using SOWFA," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 211-218.
    2. Adaramola, M.S. & Krogstad, P.-Å., 2011. "Experimental investigation of wake effects on wind turbine performance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 2078-2086.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cheng, Biyi & Yao, Yingxue, 2023. "Machine learning based surrogate model to analyze wind tunnel experiment data of Darrieus wind turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    2. Adedipe, Tosin & Shafiee, Mahmood & Zio, Enrico, 2020. "Bayesian Network Modelling for the Wind Energy Industry: An Overview," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    3. Wim Munters & Johan Meyers, 2018. "Dynamic Strategies for Yaw and Induction Control of Wind Farms Based on Large-Eddy Simulation and Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-32, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harsh S. Dhiman & Dipankar Deb & Vlad Muresan & Valentina E. Balas, 2019. "Wake Management in Wind Farms: An Adaptive Control Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Dou, Bingzheng & Guala, Michele & Lei, Liping & Zeng, Pan, 2019. "Wake model for horizontal-axis wind and hydrokinetic turbines in yawed conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1383-1395.
    3. Park, Jinkyoo & Law, Kincho H., 2016. "A data-driven, cooperative wind farm control to maximize the total power production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 151-165.
    4. Guo-Wei Qian & Takeshi Ishihara, 2018. "A New Analytical Wake Model for Yawed Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, March.
    5. Ma, Hongliang & Ge, Mingwei & Wu, Guangxing & Du, Bowen & Liu, Yongqian, 2021. "Formulas of the optimized yaw angles for cooperative control of wind farms with aligned turbines to maximize the power production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    6. Shen, Wen Zhong & Lin, Jian Wei & Jiang, Yu Hang & Feng, Ju & Cheng, Li & Zhu, Wei Jun, 2023. "A novel yaw wake model for wind farm control applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    7. Rubel C. Das & Yu-Lin Shen, 2023. "Analysis of Wind Farms under Different Yaw Angles and Wind Speeds," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Can Zhang & Jisheng Zhang & Athanasios Angeloudis & Yudi Zhou & Stephan C. Kramer & Matthew D. Piggott, 2023. "Physical Modelling of Tidal Stream Turbine Wake Structures under Yaw Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-21, February.
    9. De-Zhi Wei & Ni-Na Wang & De-Cheng Wan, 2021. "Modelling Yawed Wind Turbine Wakes: Extension of a Gaussian-Based Wake Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.
    10. Johlas, Hannah M. & Schmidt, David P. & Lackner, Matthew A., 2022. "Large eddy simulations of curled wakes from tilted wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 349-360.
    11. Balakrishnan, Raj Kiran & Son, Eunkuk & Hur, Sung-ho, 2024. "Optimization of wind farm power output using wake redirection control," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    12. Bottasso, C.L. & Cacciola, S. & Schreiber, J., 2018. "Local wind speed estimation, with application to wake impingement detection," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 155-168.
    13. Frederik, Joeri A. & van Wingerden, Jan-Willem, 2022. "On the load impact of dynamic wind farm wake mixing strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 582-595.
    14. Hayat, Imran & Chatterjee, Tanmoy & Liu, Huiwen & Peet, Yulia T. & Chamorro, Leonardo P., 2019. "Exploring wind farms with alternating two- and three-bladed wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 764-774.
    15. He, Ruiyang & Yang, Hongxing & Lu, Lin, 2023. "Optimal yaw strategy and fatigue analysis of wind turbines under the combined effects of wake and yaw control," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    16. Li, Qing'an & Cai, Chang & Kamada, Yasunari & Maeda, Takao & Hiromori, Yuto & Zhou, Shuni & Xu, Jianzhong, 2021. "Prediction of power generation of two 30 kW Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines with Gaussian model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    17. Guillem Armengol Barcos & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2023. "Enhancing Wind Farm Performance through Axial Induction and Tilt Control: Insights from Wind Tunnel Experiments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, December.
    18. Rivera-Arreba, Irene & Li, Zhaobin & Yang, Xiaolei & Bachynski-Polić, Erin E., 2024. "Comparison of the dynamic wake meandering model against large eddy simulation for horizontal and vertical steering of wind turbine wakes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    19. Su, Keye & Bliss, Donald, 2019. "A novel hybrid free-wake model for wind turbine performance and wake evolution," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 977-992.
    20. Francesco Mazzeo & Derek Micheletto & Alessandro Talamelli & Antonio Segalini, 2022. "An Experimental Study on a Wind Turbine Rotor Affected by Pitch Imbalance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-16, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:7:p:852-:d:102838. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.