IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v12y2024i5p120-d1395251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Economy Development, Common Prosperity, and Carbon Emissions: An Empirical Study in China

Author

Listed:
  • Jingke Gao

    (Institute of Advanced Study, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Wenxiao Zhou

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Jinhua Cheng

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China
    Collaborative Innovation Center for Emissions Trading System Co-Constructed by the Province and Ministry, Wuhan 430205, China)

  • Ziyuan Liu

    (School of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China)

Abstract

Under the new development model, the digital economy has become a new engine to promote the green development of the economy and realize the goal of “double carbon”. Based on the panel data of 30 provinces in China from 2010 to 2020, this paper empirically investigates the impact of the development of the digital economy on energy and carbon emissions using a series of econometric models such as baseline regression, a mechanism test, and the spatial Durbin model, etc. Common prosperity plays an intermediary role between digital economy development and carbon emissions; digital economic development optimizes resource allocation, effectively solves the problem of uneven resource distribution, and reduces energy and carbon emissions while achieving common prosperity. In addition, green innovation, industrial structure, urbanization level, R&D intensity, and the degree of marketization also have different degrees of influence on energy and carbon emissions. Therefore, the government should accelerate the construction of new digital infrastructure and implement the digital economy development strategy according to local conditions, so as to promote the digital economy to produce a more significant carbon emission reduction effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingke Gao & Wenxiao Zhou & Jinhua Cheng & Ziyuan Liu, 2024. "Digital Economy Development, Common Prosperity, and Carbon Emissions: An Empirical Study in China," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:12:y:2024:i:5:p:120-:d:1395251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/12/5/120/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/12/5/120/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tetsuya Tsurumi & Shunsuke Managi, 2010. "Decomposition of the environmental Kuznets curve: scale, technique, and composition effects," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 11(1), pages 19-36, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fujii, Hidemichi & Managi, Shunsuke, 2013. "Which industry is greener? An empirical study of nine industries in OECD countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 381-388.
    2. George Halkos & Iacovos Psarianos, 2016. "Exploring the effect of including the environment in the neoclassical growth model," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 18(3), pages 339-358, July.
    3. Maurizio Lisciandra & Carlo Migliardo, 2017. "An Empirical Study of the Impact of Corruption on Environmental Performance: Evidence from Panel Data," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(2), pages 297-318, October.
    4. Liu, Lee, 2012. "Environmental poverty, a decomposed environmental Kuznets curve, and alternatives: Sustainability lessons from China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 86-92.
    5. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Gozgor, Giray & Adom, Philip Kofi & Hammoudeh, Shawkat, 2019. "The technical decomposition of carbon emissions and the concerns about FDI and trade openness effects in the United States," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 56-73.
    6. Managi, Shunsuke, 2012. "Trade, economic growth and environment," IDE Discussion Papers 342, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    7. Pradyot Ranjan Jena & Shunsuke Managi & Babita Majhi, 2021. "Forecasting the CO 2 Emissions at the Global Level: A Multilayer Artificial Neural Network Modelling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, October.
    8. Du, Xiuying & Xie, Zixiong, 2020. "Occurrence of turning point on environmental Kuznets curve in the process of (de)industrialization," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 359-369.
    9. Weidong Sun & Zhigang Chen & Danyang Wang, 2019. "Can Land Marketization Help Reduce Industrial Pollution?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-16, June.
    10. Cuma Bozkurt & Yusuf Akan, 2014. "Economic Growth, CO2 Emissions and Energy Consumption: The Turkish Case," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 4(3), pages 484-494.
    11. Cristian Barra & Roberto Zotti, 2018. "Investigating the non-linearity between national income and environmental pollution: international evidence of Kuznets curve," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 20(1), pages 179-210, January.
    12. Diego Martínez-Navarro & Ignacio Amate-Fortes & Almudena Guarnido-Rueda, 2020. "Inequality and development: is the Kuznets curve in effect today?," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 37(3), pages 703-735, October.
    13. Kurita, Kenichi & Managi, Shunsuke, 2021. "Circular economy in cities: An economic theory to decouple economic development from waste," MPRA Paper 105435, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Pengyan Zhang & Yu Zhang & Jay Lee & Yanyan Li & Jiaxin Yang & Wenliang Geng & Ying Liu & Tianqi Rong & Jingwen Shao & Bin Li, 2020. "Characteristics of the Spatio-Temporal Trends and Driving Factors of Industrial Development and Industrial SO 2 Emissions Based on Niche Theory: Taking Henan Province as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    15. Y. Farzin & Kelly Grogan, 2013. "Socioeconomic factors and water quality in California," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 15(1), pages 1-37, January.
    16. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussain & Kumar, Mantu, 2017. "Is Globalization Detrimental to CO2 Emissions in Japan? New Threshold Analysis," MPRA Paper 82413, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 03 Nov 2017.
    17. Sugiawan, Yogi & Managi, Shunsuke, 2016. "The environmental Kuznets curve in Indonesia: Exploring the potential of renewable energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 187-198.
    18. Novice patrick Bakehe, 2018. "Decomposition of the Environmental Kuznets curve for Deforestation in the Congo Basin," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 38(2), pages 1058-1068.
    19. George E. Halkos & Christina Bampatsou, 2019. "Economic growth and environmental degradation: a conditional nonparametric frontier analysis," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 21(2), pages 325-347, April.
    20. Wei-Bin Zhang, 2020. "Growth, Wealth Accumulation and Environmental Change in Portfolio Choice and Trade," South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, Association of Economic Universities of South and Eastern Europe and the Black Sea Region, vol. 18(2), pages 197-216.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:12:y:2024:i:5:p:120-:d:1395251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.