IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jchals/v16y2024i1p1-d1551251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges for Compliance with Industrial Effluent Regulations—An Industry Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Zulaikha Mokhtar

    (School of Chemical Engineering, Australian Centre for Water and Environmental Biotechnology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
    Department of Environment, Levels 1–4, Podium 2 & 3, Wisma Sumber Asli, No.25, Persiaran Perdana, Precinct 4, Federal Government Administrative Centre, Putrajaya 62574, Malaysia)

  • Steven Kenway

    (School of Chemical Engineering, Australian Centre for Water and Environmental Biotechnology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia)

  • Irdayanti Mat Nashir

    (Department of Engineering Technology, Faculty of Technical and Vocational, Research Management Information Centre, Sultan Idris Education University (UPSI), Tanjung Malim 35900, Malaysia)

Abstract

This study thoroughly examines the environmental challenges faced by Malaysian industries in adhering to industrial effluent regulations, addressing the question: what are the obstacles to compliance from the industry’s perspective? This study focuses on eight industries known for low environmental compliance over a seven-year period. Interviews with 13 stakeholders with combined operational experience of over 200 years were conducted to uncover barriers to compliance from the industry’s viewpoint. Key challenges identified include costs , employee attitudes , technology , management support , public complaints , and jurisdictional issues . The responses highlighted the complexity of compliance issues, ranging from divergent to unified viewpoints. According to respondents, enhancing compliance hinges on behavioral changes driven by awareness , incentives , enforcement , guidance , industry ratings , management commitment , and public disclosure of emissions data . This approach provides fresh practical insights that contribute to policy development, insights not previously documented in the literature. This study underscores the government’s crucial role in regulation adherence and the need to analyze barriers and explore alternative approaches. Understanding industry perspectives and strategies for continuous improvement is imperative. Therefore, analyzing current challenges and adopting adaptive measures are essential steps towards achieving self-compliance, continuous improvement, and ensuring environmental sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Zulaikha Mokhtar & Steven Kenway & Irdayanti Mat Nashir, 2024. "Challenges for Compliance with Industrial Effluent Regulations—An Industry Perspective," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:1-:d:1551251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/16/1/1/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/16/1/1/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne Wambui Mumbi & Tsunemi Watanabe, 2022. "Cost Estimations of Water Pollution for the Adoption of Suitable Water Treatment Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Lia Tirabeni & Paola De Bernardi & Canio Forliano & Mattia Franco, 2019. "How Can Organisations and Business Models Lead to a More Sustainable Society? A Framework from a Systematic Review of the Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Søren C. Winter & Peter J. May, 2001. "Motivation for Compliance with Environmental Regulations," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(4), pages 675-698.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Zibin & Yang, Wenxin & Ye, Jianliang, 2021. "Why sulfur dioxide emissions decline significantly from coal-fired power plants in China? Evidence from the desulfurated electricity pricing premium program," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PB).
    2. Leibbrandt, Andreas & Lynham, John, 2018. "Does the allocation of property rights matter in the commons?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 201-217.
    3. Jesse L. Reynolds & Edward A. Parson, 2020. "Nonstate governance of solar geoengineering research," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 323-342, May.
    4. Jeroen van der Heijden & Jitske de Jong, 2009. "Towards a Better Understanding of Building Regulation," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 36(6), pages 1038-1052, December.
    5. Abdullah Banikhalid & Michel Rahbeh, 2024. "The Role of the Law in Prompting Environmental Stewardship for Farms Located Near Phosphate Mines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-22, January.
    6. repec:plo:pone00:0114460 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Huiqi Yan & Jeroen van der Heijden & Benjamin van Rooij, 2017. "Symmetric and asymmetric motivations for compliance and violation: A crisp set qualitative comparative analysis of Chinese farmers," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 64-80, March.
    8. Yingjie Hao & Congcong Fan & Yunguang Long & Jieyi Pan, 2019. "The role of returnee executives in improving green innovation performance of Chinese manufacturing enterprises: Implications for sustainable development strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 804-818, July.
    9. Rafael Robina Ramírez & Pedro R. Palos-Sánchez, 2018. "Environmental Firms’ Better Attitude towards Nature in the Context of Corporate Compliance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.
    10. Lucas Bretschger & Alexandra Vinogradova, 2015. "Equitable and effective climate policy: Integrating less developed countries into a global climate agreement," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 437-467, October.
    11. Ann-Kathrin Koessler & Stefanie Engel, 2021. "Policies as Information Carriers: How Environmental Policies May Change Beliefs and Consequent Behavior," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 15(1-2), pages 1-31, July.
    12. Jo Crotty & Peter Rodgers, 2012. "Sustainable Development in the Russia Federation: The Limits of Greening within Industrial Firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 178-190, May.
    13. Adolfo Carballo-Penela & Emilio Ruzo-Sanmartín & Carlos M. P. Sousa, 2020. "Influence of Business Commitment to Sustainability, Perceived Value Fit, and Gender in Job Seekers’ Pursuit Intentions: A Cross-Country Moderated Mediation Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, May.
    14. Yao-Jen Fan & Shuo-Fang Liu & Ding-Bang Luh & Pei-Shan Teng, 2021. "Corporate Sustainability: Impact Factors on Organizational Innovation in the Industrial Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    15. Bishal Bharadwaj, 2016. "Plastic Bag Ban in Nepal: Enforcement and Effectiveness," Working Papers id:11548, eSocialSciences.
    16. Stephen Clibborn & Sally Hanna‐Osborne, 2023. "The employer perspective on wage law non‐compliance: State of the field and a framework for new understanding," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 411-438, October.
    17. Ahsan Habib & Md Borhan Uddin Bhuiyan, 2017. "Determinants of monetary penalties for environmental violations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(6), pages 754-775, September.
    18. Alm, James & Shimshack, Jay, 2014. "Environmental Enforcement and Compliance: Lessons from Pollution, Safety, and Tax Settings," Foundations and Trends(R) in Microeconomics, now publishers, vol. 10(4), pages 209-274, December.
    19. Bożena Gajdzik & Sandra Grabowska & Sebastian Saniuk & Tadeusz Wieczorek, 2020. "Sustainable Development and Industry 4.0: A Bibliometric Analysis Identifying Key Scientific Problems of the Sustainable Industry 4.0," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-27, August.
    20. Hans de Bruijn & Martijn Groenleer & Theo van Ruijven, 2016. "The dynamics of doping: Lance Armstrong, the United States Anti‐Doping Agency and the regulatory governance of professional cycling," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(3), pages 284-297, September.
    21. Vollaard, Ben, 2017. "Temporal displacement of environmental crime: Evidence from marine oil pollution," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 168-180.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:1-:d:1551251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.