IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v8y2018i3p42-d136752.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploiting Waste Heat from Combine Harvesters to Damage Harvested Weed Seeds and Reduce Weed Infestation

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Andreasen

    (Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Højbakkegaard Allé 13, DK-2630 Taastrup, Denmark)

  • Zahra Bitarafan

    (Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Højbakkegaard Allé 13, DK-2630 Taastrup, Denmark)

  • Johanna Fenselau

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Environmental, Safety, and Energy Technology UMSICHT, Osterfelder Straße 3, 46047 Oberhausen, Germany)

  • Christoph Glasner

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Environmental, Safety, and Energy Technology UMSICHT, Osterfelder Straße 3, 46047 Oberhausen, Germany)

Abstract

Weeds are mainly controlled with herbicides in intensive crop production, but this has resulted in increasing problems with herbicide-resistant weeds and public concerns about the unwanted side-effects of herbicide use. Therefore, there is a need for new alternative methods to reduce weed problems. One way to reduce weed infestation could be to collect or kill weed seeds produced in the growing season. Crop and weeds are harvested simultaneously with the combine harvester, but most of the weed seeds are returned with the chaff to the field creating new problems in future growing seasons. During the harvesting process, the harvester produces heat. Under normal harvest conditions, the exhaust gas temperature measured directly behind the turbocharger of the engine of a combine harvester may reach between 400 °C and 480 °C depending of the size of the engine. These high temperatures indicate that there is a potential for developing a system which perhaps could be utilized to kill or damage the weeds seeds. We investigate how much heat is needed to damage weed seeds significantly and focuses on the germination patterns over time in response to these treatments. We investigated if heat treatment of weed seeds could kill the seeds or reduce seed vigour or kill the seeds before they are returned to the field. The aim is to avoid harvested viable weed seeds being added to the soil seed bank. During the threshing and cleaning process in the combine harvester, most weed seeds and chaff are separated from the crop grains. After this separation, we imagine that the weed seeds could be exposed to a high temperature before they are returned to the field. Seeds of nine common weed species were treated with temperatures of 50 °C, 100 °C, 150 °C, 200 °C, and 250 °C for 0, 2, 5, 10, and 20 s, respectively. Afterwards, the seeds were germinated for fourteen days. Seeds were differently affected by the heat treatments. We found that 50 °C and 100 °C was insufficient to harm the seeds of all species significantly at all durations. Heating with a temperature of 50 °C and 100 °C showed a slight tendency to break the dormancy of Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. and Papaver rhoeas L., but the results were not statistically significant. Seeds treated with 150 °C gave varying results depending on the duration and the weed species. The germination of A. myosuroides was significantly repressed when seeds were exposed to 250 °C for 5 s. Most species were significantly damaged when they were exposed to 250 °C for more than 10 s. Our results showed that there is a potential to explore how the waste heat energy produced by combine harvesters can be exploited to either kill or reduce the vigour of weed seeds before they are returned to the field with the chaff.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Andreasen & Zahra Bitarafan & Johanna Fenselau & Christoph Glasner, 2018. "Exploiting Waste Heat from Combine Harvesters to Damage Harvested Weed Seeds and Reduce Weed Infestation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-12, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:8:y:2018:i:3:p:42-:d:136752
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/8/3/42/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/8/3/42/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ritz, Christian & Streibig, Jens C., 2005. "Bioassay Analysis Using R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 12(i05).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. José Ignacio Rojas-Sola & Gloria del Río-Cidoncha & Ángel Coronil-García, 2020. "Industrial Archaeology Applied to the Study of an Ancient Harvesting Machine: Three-Dimensional Modelling and Virtual Reconstruction," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Christoph Glasner & Christopher Vieregge & Josef Robert & Johanna Fenselau & Zahra Bitarafan & Christian Andreasen, 2019. "Evaluation of New Harvesting Methods to Reduce Weeds on Arable Fields and Collect a New Feedstock," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Camilo Guzmán & Manish Bagga & Amanpreet Kaur & Jukka Westermarck & Daniel Abankwa, 2014. "ColonyArea: An ImageJ Plugin to Automatically Quantify Colony Formation in Clonogenic Assays," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-9, March.
    2. Jens Peter Andersen & Björn Hammarfelt, 2011. "Price revisited: on the growth of dissertations in eight research fields," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 88(2), pages 371-383, August.
    3. LonÄ arić, Željka & K. Hackenberger, Branimir, 2013. "Stage and age structured Aedes vexans and Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) climate-dependent matrix population model," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 82-94.
    4. Signe M. Jensen & Christian Ritz, 2015. "Simultaneous Inference for Model Averaging of Derived Parameters," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(1), pages 68-76, January.
    5. Christoph Kunz & Dominic J. Sturm & Markus Sökefeld & Roland Gerhards, 2017. "Weed suppression and early sugar beet development under different cover crop mulches," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 53(3), pages 187-193.
    6. Holst, Niels & Lang, Andreas & Lövei, Gabor & Otto, Mathias, 2013. "Increased mortality is predicted of Inachis io larvae caused by Bt-maize pollen in European farmland," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 126-133.
    7. Muhammad Javaid Akhter & Solvejg Kopp Mathiassen & Zelalem Eshetu Bekalu & Henrik Brinch-Pedersen & Per Kudsk, 2021. "Increased Activity of 5-Enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate Synthase (EPSPS) Enzyme Describe the Natural Tolerance of Vulpia myuros to Glyphosate in Comparison with Apera spica-venti," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Erickson, Richard A. & Cox, Stephen B. & Oates, Jessica L. & Anderson, Todd A. & Salice, Christopher J. & Long, Kevin R., 2014. "A Daphnia population model that considers pesticide exposure and demographic stochasticity," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 275(C), pages 37-47.
    9. Floriane Larras & Agnès Bouchez & Frédéric Rimet & Bernard Montuelle, 2012. "Using Bioassays and Species Sensitivity Distributions to Assess Herbicide Toxicity towards Benthic Diatoms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-9, August.
    10. Euro Pannacci & Daniele Del Buono & Maria Luce Bartucca & Luigi Nasini & Primo Proietti & Francesco Tei, 2020. "Herbicide Uptake and Regrowth Ability of Tall Fescue and Orchardgrass in S-Metolachlor-Contaminated Leachates from Sand Pot Experiment," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-10, October.
    11. Kahm, Matthias & Hasenbrink, Guido & Lichtenberg-Fraté, Hella & Ludwig, Jost & Kschischo, Maik, 2010. "grofit: Fitting Biological Growth Curves with R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 33(i07).
    12. Hector Sanz & John J Aponte & Jaroslaw Harezlak & Yan Dong & Aintzane Ayestaran & Augusto Nhabomba & Maxmillian Mpina & Obiang Régis Maurin & Núria Díez-Padrisa & Ruth Aguilar & Gemma Moncunill & Agna, 2017. "drLumi: An open-source package to manage data, calibrate, and conduct quality control of multiplex bead-based immunoassays data analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Y. Fong & J. Wakefield & S. De Rosa & N. Frahm, 2012. "A Robust Bayesian Random Effects Model for Nonlinear Calibration Problems," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 1103-1112, December.
    14. Euro Pannacci & Selene Baratta & Beatrice Falcinelli & Michela Farneselli & Francesco Tei, 2022. "Mugwort ( Artemisia vulgaris L.) Aqueous Extract: Hormesis and Biostimulant Activity for Seed Germination and Seedling Growth in Vegetable Crops," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-10, August.
    15. Gianna S. Monti & Peter Filzmoser & Roland C. Deutsch, 2018. "A Robust Approach to Risk Assessment Based on Species Sensitivity Distributions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(10), pages 2073-2086, October.
    16. Baty, Florent & Ritz, Christian & Charles, Sandrine & Brutsche, Martin & Flandrois, Jean-Pierre & Delignette-Muller, Marie-Laure, 2015. "A Toolbox for Nonlinear Regression in R: The Package nlstools," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 66(i05).
    17. Lea A I Vaas & Johannes Sikorski & Victoria Michael & Markus Göker & Hans-Peter Klenk, 2012. "Visualization and Curve-Parameter Estimation Strategies for Efficient Exploration of Phenotype Microarray Kinetics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-18, April.
    18. Fox, John & Leanage, Allison, 2016. "R and the Journal of Statistical Software," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 73(i02).
    19. repec:jss:jstsof:33:i07 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Ádám Z Lendvai & Çağlar Akçay & Jenny Q Ouyang & Roslyn Dakin & Alice D Domalik & Prianka S St John & Mark Stanback & Ignacio T Moore & Frances Bonier, 2015. "Analysis of the Optimal Duration of Behavioral Observations Based on an Automated Continuous Monitoring System in Tree Swallows (Tachycineta bicolor): Is One Hour Good Enough?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-11, November.
    21. Euro Pannacci & Marco Masi & Michela Farneselli & Francesco Tei, 2020. "Evaluation of Mugwort ( Artemisia vulgaris L.) Aqueous Extract as a Potential Bioherbicide to Control Amaranthus retroflexus L. in Maize," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:8:y:2018:i:3:p:42-:d:136752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.