IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v38y2018i10p2073-2086.html

A Robust Approach to Risk Assessment Based on Species Sensitivity Distributions

Author

Listed:
  • Gianna S. Monti
  • Peter Filzmoser
  • Roland C. Deutsch

Abstract

The guidelines for setting environmental quality standards are increasingly based on probabilistic risk assessment due to a growing general awareness of the need for probabilistic procedures. One of the commonly used tools in probabilistic risk assessment is the species sensitivity distribution (SSD), which represents the proportion of species affected belonging to a biological assemblage as a function of exposure to a specific toxicant. Our focus is on the inverse use of the SSD curve with the aim of estimating the concentration, HCp, of a toxic compound that is hazardous to p% of the biological community under study. Toward this end, we propose the use of robust statistical methods in order to take into account the presence of outliers or apparent skew in the data, which may occur without any ecological basis. A robust approach exploits the full neighborhood of a parametric model, enabling the analyst to account for the typical real‐world deviations from ideal models. We examine two classic HCp estimation approaches and consider robust versions of these estimators. In addition, we also use data transformations in conjunction with robust estimation methods in case of heteroscedasticity. Different scenarios using real data sets as well as simulated data are presented in order to illustrate and compare the proposed approaches. These scenarios illustrate that the use of robust estimation methods enhances HCp estimation.

Suggested Citation

  • Gianna S. Monti & Peter Filzmoser & Roland C. Deutsch, 2018. "A Robust Approach to Risk Assessment Based on Species Sensitivity Distributions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(10), pages 2073-2086, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:38:y:2018:i:10:p:2073-2086
    DOI: 10.1111/risa.13009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13009
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/risa.13009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Graeme L. Hickey & Peter S. Craig, 2012. "Competing Statistical Methods for the Fitting of Normal Species Sensitivity Distributions: Recommendations for Practitioners," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(7), pages 1232-1243, July.
    2. Marazzi, Alfio & Yohai, Victor J., 2006. "Robust Box-Cox transformations based on minimum residual autocorrelation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(10), pages 2752-2768, June.
    3. Ritz, Christian & Streibig, Jens C., 2005. "Bioassay Analysis Using R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 12(i05).
    4. Todorov, Valentin & Filzmoser, Peter, 2009. "An Object-Oriented Framework for Robust Multivariate Analysis," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 32(i03).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baty, Florent & Ritz, Christian & Charles, Sandrine & Brutsche, Martin & Flandrois, Jean-Pierre & Delignette-Muller, Marie-Laure, 2015. "A Toolbox for Nonlinear Regression in R: The Package nlstools," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 66(i05).
    2. Steffen Liebscher & Thomas Kirschstein, 2015. "Efficiency of the pMST and RDELA location and scatter estimators," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 99(1), pages 63-82, January.
    3. Camilo Guzmán & Manish Bagga & Amanpreet Kaur & Jukka Westermarck & Daniel Abankwa, 2014. "ColonyArea: An ImageJ Plugin to Automatically Quantify Colony Formation in Clonogenic Assays," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-9, March.
    4. B. Barış Alkan, 2016. "Robust Principal Component Analysis Based on Modified Minimum Covariance Determinant in the Presence of Outliers," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 4(2), pages 85-94, September.
    5. M. Hubert & P. Rousseeuw & K. Vakili, 2014. "Shape bias of robust covariance estimators: an empirical study," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 15-28, February.
    6. Jens Peter Andersen & Björn Hammarfelt, 2011. "Price revisited: on the growth of dissertations in eight research fields," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 88(2), pages 371-383, August.
    7. Luke A. Prendergast & Simon J. Sheather, 2013. "On Sensitivity of Inverse Response Plot Estimation and the Benefits of a Robust Estimation Approach," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 40(2), pages 219-237, June.
    8. Marco Riani & Andrea Cerioli & Francesca Torti, 2014. "On consistency factors and efficiency of robust S-estimators," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(2), pages 356-387, June.
    9. Bilodeau, Martin & Micheaux, Pierre Lafaye de & Mahdi, Smail, 2015. "The R Package groc for Generalized Regression on Orthogonal Components," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 65(i01).
    10. Becquart, Colombe & Archimbaud, Aurore & Ruiz-Gazen, Anne & Prilć, Luka & Nordhausen, Klaus, 2026. "Invariant Coordinate Selection and Fisher discriminant subspace beyond the case of two groups," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    11. Sanjeena Subedi & Paul McNicholas, 2014. "Variational Bayes approximations for clustering via mixtures of normal inverse Gaussian distributions," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 8(2), pages 167-193, June.
    12. T. Kirschstein & Steffen Liebscher, 2019. "Assessing the market values of soccer players – a robust analysis of data from German 1. and 2. Bundesliga," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(7), pages 1336-1349, May.
    13. LonÄ arić, Željka & K. Hackenberger, Branimir, 2013. "Stage and age structured Aedes vexans and Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) climate-dependent matrix population model," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 82-94.
    14. Vilijandas Bagdonavičius & Linas Petkevičius, 2020. "A new multiple outliers identification method in linear regression," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 83(3), pages 275-296, April.
    15. Jan Kalina & Jan Tichavský, 2022. "The minimum weighted covariance determinant estimator for high-dimensional data," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 16(4), pages 977-999, December.
    16. Andrea Bergesio & María Eugenia Szretter Noste & Víctor J. Yohai, 2021. "A robust proposal of estimation for the sufficient dimension reduction problem," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(3), pages 758-783, September.
    17. Francesca Torti & Aldo Corbellini & Anthony C. Atkinson, 2021. "fsdaSAS: A Package for Robust Regression for Very Large Datasets Including the Batch Forward Search," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-21, April.
    18. repec:plo:pone00:0131233 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Robert Finger, 2010. "Review of ‘Robustbase’ software for R," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(7), pages 1205-1210, November/.
    20. Sven Serneels, 2019. "Projection pursuit based generalized betas accounting for higher order co-moment effects in financial market analysis," Papers 1908.00141, arXiv.org.
    21. Langworthy, Benjamin W. & Stephens, Rebecca L. & Gilmore, John H. & Fine, Jason P., 2021. "Canonical correlation analysis for elliptical copulas," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:38:y:2018:i:10:p:2073-2086. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.