IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i20p2115-d1769060.html

Bio-Efficiency of Foliar Herbicides Applied with Drift-Reducing Nozzles

Author

Listed:
  • Sander De Ryck

    (Weed Science Unit, Department of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University (UGent), 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Eline Van Hecke

    (Weed Science Unit, Department of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University (UGent), 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Ingrid Zwertvaegher

    (Technology and Food Science Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), 9820 Merelbeke-Melle, Belgium)

  • David Nuyttens

    (Technology and Food Science Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), 9820 Merelbeke-Melle, Belgium)

  • Jan Vanwijnsberghe

    (INAGRO, 8800 Rumbeke-Beitem, Belgium)

  • Tewodros Andargie Zewdie

    (BIOSYST-MeBioS, Department of Biosystems, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven), 3000 Leuven, Belgium)

  • Pieter Verboven

    (BIOSYST-MeBioS, Department of Biosystems, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven), 3000 Leuven, Belgium)

  • Mattie De Meester

    (Weed Science Unit, Department of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University (UGent), 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Benny De Cauwer

    (Weed Science Unit, Department of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University (UGent), 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

Abstract

The increasing implementation of drift-reduction regulations in agriculture has driven the widespread adoption of drift-reducing spray nozzles. However, concerns remain about their impact on the biological efficacy of foliar-applied herbicides, particularly at early weed growth stages. This study evaluated the bio-efficiency of various drift-reducing flat-fan nozzles across three weed species ( Chenopodium album , Solanum nigrum , and Echinochloa crus-galli ), two growth stages, and six herbicides differing in mode of action and formulation properties. Dose–response bioassays were conducted using eight nozzle–pressure combinations under controlled greenhouse conditions. Spray characteristics, including droplet size distribution, coverage, contact angle, and surface tension, were quantified to elucidate interactions affecting herbicide efficacy. The results showed that nozzle effects were more pronounced for high-surface-tension formulations and poorly wettable weed targets. Several coarser droplet drift-reducing nozzles (e.g., ID3, APTJ) showed inferior performance in controlling small C. album and S. nigrum targets with bentazon and erectophile E. crus-galli targets with cycloxydim. At the same time, nozzle choice was less critical for tembotrione and nicosulfuron spray solutions, which have low surface tension. Across weed species, growth stages, and herbicides, nozzles producing finer, slower droplets demonstrated superior and more consistent performance compared to those producing larger, faster droplets. These findings offer science-based guidance for selecting nozzle types that balance drift mitigation with effective weed control under current and future regulatory constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Sander De Ryck & Eline Van Hecke & Ingrid Zwertvaegher & David Nuyttens & Jan Vanwijnsberghe & Tewodros Andargie Zewdie & Pieter Verboven & Mattie De Meester & Benny De Cauwer, 2025. "Bio-Efficiency of Foliar Herbicides Applied with Drift-Reducing Nozzles," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-24, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:20:p:2115-:d:1769060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/20/2115/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/20/2115/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ritz, Christian & Streibig, Jens C., 2005. "Bioassay Analysis Using R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 12(i05).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Floriane Larras & Agnès Bouchez & Frédéric Rimet & Bernard Montuelle, 2012. "Using Bioassays and Species Sensitivity Distributions to Assess Herbicide Toxicity towards Benthic Diatoms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-9, August.
    2. Euro Pannacci & Daniele Del Buono & Maria Luce Bartucca & Luigi Nasini & Primo Proietti & Francesco Tei, 2020. "Herbicide Uptake and Regrowth Ability of Tall Fescue and Orchardgrass in S-Metolachlor-Contaminated Leachates from Sand Pot Experiment," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-10, October.
    3. Hector Sanz & John J Aponte & Jaroslaw Harezlak & Yan Dong & Aintzane Ayestaran & Augusto Nhabomba & Maxmillian Mpina & Obiang Régis Maurin & Núria Díez-Padrisa & Ruth Aguilar & Gemma Moncunill & Agna, 2017. "drLumi: An open-source package to manage data, calibrate, and conduct quality control of multiplex bead-based immunoassays data analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Camilo Guzmán & Manish Bagga & Amanpreet Kaur & Jukka Westermarck & Daniel Abankwa, 2014. "ColonyArea: An ImageJ Plugin to Automatically Quantify Colony Formation in Clonogenic Assays," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-9, March.
    5. Y. Fong & J. Wakefield & S. De Rosa & N. Frahm, 2012. "A Robust Bayesian Random Effects Model for Nonlinear Calibration Problems," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 1103-1112, December.
    6. Jens Peter Andersen & Björn Hammarfelt, 2011. "Price revisited: on the growth of dissertations in eight research fields," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 88(2), pages 371-383, August.
    7. Euro Pannacci & Selene Baratta & Beatrice Falcinelli & Michela Farneselli & Francesco Tei, 2022. "Mugwort ( Artemisia vulgaris L.) Aqueous Extract: Hormesis and Biostimulant Activity for Seed Germination and Seedling Growth in Vegetable Crops," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-10, August.
    8. Gianna S. Monti & Peter Filzmoser & Roland C. Deutsch, 2018. "A Robust Approach to Risk Assessment Based on Species Sensitivity Distributions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(10), pages 2073-2086, October.
    9. LonÄ arić, Željka & K. Hackenberger, Branimir, 2013. "Stage and age structured Aedes vexans and Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) climate-dependent matrix population model," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 82-94.
    10. Baty, Florent & Ritz, Christian & Charles, Sandrine & Brutsche, Martin & Flandrois, Jean-Pierre & Delignette-Muller, Marie-Laure, 2015. "A Toolbox for Nonlinear Regression in R: The Package nlstools," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 66(i05).
    11. repec:plo:pone00:0131233 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Lea A I Vaas & Johannes Sikorski & Victoria Michael & Markus Göker & Hans-Peter Klenk, 2012. "Visualization and Curve-Parameter Estimation Strategies for Efficient Exploration of Phenotype Microarray Kinetics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-18, April.
    13. Fox, John & Leanage, Allison, 2016. "R and the Journal of Statistical Software," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 73(i02).
    14. repec:jss:jstsof:33:i07 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Signe M. Jensen & Christian Ritz, 2015. "Simultaneous Inference for Model Averaging of Derived Parameters," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(1), pages 68-76, January.
    16. Ádám Z Lendvai & Çağlar Akçay & Jenny Q Ouyang & Roslyn Dakin & Alice D Domalik & Prianka S St John & Mark Stanback & Ignacio T Moore & Frances Bonier, 2015. "Analysis of the Optimal Duration of Behavioral Observations Based on an Automated Continuous Monitoring System in Tree Swallows (Tachycineta bicolor): Is One Hour Good Enough?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-11, November.
    17. Euro Pannacci & Marco Masi & Michela Farneselli & Francesco Tei, 2020. "Evaluation of Mugwort ( Artemisia vulgaris L.) Aqueous Extract as a Potential Bioherbicide to Control Amaranthus retroflexus L. in Maize," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Christoph Kunz & Dominic J. Sturm & Markus Sökefeld & Roland Gerhards, 2017. "Weed suppression and early sugar beet development under different cover crop mulches," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 53(3), pages 187-193.
    19. Holst, Niels & Lang, Andreas & Lövei, Gabor & Otto, Mathias, 2013. "Increased mortality is predicted of Inachis io larvae caused by Bt-maize pollen in European farmland," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 126-133.
    20. Muhammad Javaid Akhter & Solvejg Kopp Mathiassen & Zelalem Eshetu Bekalu & Henrik Brinch-Pedersen & Per Kudsk, 2021. "Increased Activity of 5-Enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate Synthase (EPSPS) Enzyme Describe the Natural Tolerance of Vulpia myuros to Glyphosate in Comparison with Apera spica-venti," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, July.
    21. Erickson, Richard A. & Cox, Stephen B. & Oates, Jessica L. & Anderson, Todd A. & Salice, Christopher J. & Long, Kevin R., 2014. "A Daphnia population model that considers pesticide exposure and demographic stochasticity," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 275(C), pages 37-47.
    22. Christian Andreasen & Zahra Bitarafan & Johanna Fenselau & Christoph Glasner, 2018. "Exploiting Waste Heat from Combine Harvesters to Damage Harvested Weed Seeds and Reduce Weed Infestation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-12, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:20:p:2115-:d:1769060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.