Author
Listed:
- Kashif Dawood Khan
(Division of Animal Genetics and Breeding, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal 132001, Haryana, India)
- Rani Alex
(Division of Animal Genetics and Breeding, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal 132001, Haryana, India)
- Ashish Yadav
(Division of Animal Genetics and Breeding, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal 132001, Haryana, India)
- Varadanayakanahalli N. Sahana
(Division of Animal Genetics and Breeding, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal 132001, Haryana, India)
- Amritanshu Upadhyay
(Division of Animal Genetics and Breeding, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal 132001, Haryana, India)
- Rajesh V. Mani
(Kerala Livestock Development Board (KLDB), Gokkulam, Thiruvananthapuram 695004, Kerala, India)
- Thankappan Sajeev Kumar
(Kerala Livestock Development Board (KLDB), Gokkulam, Thiruvananthapuram 695004, Kerala, India)
- Rajeev Raghavan Pillai
(Kerala Livestock Development Board (KLDB), Gokkulam, Thiruvananthapuram 695004, Kerala, India)
- Vikas Vohra
(Division of Animal Genetics and Breeding, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal 132001, Haryana, India)
- Gopal Ramdasji Gowane
(Division of Animal Genetics and Breeding, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal 132001, Haryana, India)
Abstract
Implementing genomic selection in smallholder dairy systems is challenging due to limited genetic connectedness and diverse management practices. This study aimed to optimize genomic evaluation models for crossbred cattle in South India. Data included 305-day first lactation milk yield (FLMY) records from 17,650 cows (1984–2021), with partial pedigree and genotypes for 1004 bulls and 1568 cows. Non-genetic factors such as geography, season and period of calving, and age at first calving were significant sources of variation. The average milk yield was 2875 ± 123.54 kg. Genetic evaluation models used a female-only reference. Heritability estimates using different approaches were 0.32 ± 0.03 (REML), 0.40 ± 0.03 (ssGREML), and 0.25 ± 0.08 (GREML). Bayesian estimates (Bayes A, B, C, Cπ, and ssBR) ranged from 0.20 ± 0.02 to 0.43 ± 0.04. Genomic-only models showed reduced variance due to the Bulmer effect, as genomic data belonged to recent generations. Breeding value prediction accuracies were 0.60 (PBLUP), 0.45 (GBLUP), and 0.65 (ssGBLUP). Using the LR method, the estimates of bias, dispersion, and ratio of accuracies for ssGBLUP were −39.83, 1.09, and 0.69; for ssBR, they were 71.83, 0.83, and 0.76. ssGBLUP resulted in more accurate and less biased GEBVs than ssBR. We recommend ssGBLUP for genomic evaluation of crossbred cattle for milk production under smallholder systems.
Suggested Citation
Kashif Dawood Khan & Rani Alex & Ashish Yadav & Varadanayakanahalli N. Sahana & Amritanshu Upadhyay & Rajesh V. Mani & Thankappan Sajeev Kumar & Rajeev Raghavan Pillai & Vikas Vohra & Gopal Ramdasji G, 2025.
"Optimizing the Genomic Evaluation Model in Crossbred Cattle for Smallholder Production Systems in India,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:9:p:945-:d:1643600
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:9:p:945-:d:1643600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.