IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i5p525-d1602212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agroclimatic Indicator Analysis Under Climate Change Conditions to Predict the Climatic Suitability for Wheat Production in the Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Wondimeneh Leul Demissew

    (Center for Environmental Science, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa P.O. Box 1176, Ethiopia
    Physics Department, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa P.O. Box 05, Ethiopia)

  • Tadesse Terefe Zeleke

    (Center for Environmental Science, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa P.O. Box 1176, Ethiopia
    The International Center for Tropical Agriculture, ILRI Campus, Addis Ababa P.O. Box 5689, Ethiopia)

  • Kassahun Ture

    (Center for Environmental Science, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa P.O. Box 1176, Ethiopia)

  • Dejene K. Mengistu

    (Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture, Biodiversity International, ILRI Campus, Addis Ababa P.O. Box 5689, Ethiopia)

  • Meaza Abera Fufa

    (Center for Environmental Science, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa P.O. Box 1176, Ethiopia)

Abstract

Agricultural productivity is significantly influenced by climate-related factors. Understanding the impacts of climate change on agroclimatic conditions is critical for ensuring sustainable agricultural practices. This study investigates how key agroclimatic variables—temperature, moisture conditions, and length of the growing season (LGS)—influence wheat suitability in the Upper Blue Nile Basin (UBNB), Ethiopia. The Global Agroecological Zones (GAEZ) methodology was employed to assess agroclimatic suitability, integrating climate projections from Climate Models Intercomparison Project v6 (CMIP6) under shared socioeconomic pathway (ssp370 and ssp585) scenarios. The CMIP6 data provided downscaled projections for temperature and precipitation, while the GAEZ framework translated these climatic inputs into agroclimatic indicators, enabling spatially explicit analyses of land suitability. Projections indicate significant warming, with mean annual temperatures expected to rise between 1.13 °C and 4.85 °C by the end of the century. Precipitation levels are anticipated to increase overall, although spatial variability may challenge moisture availability in some regions. The LGS is projected to extend, particularly in the southern and southeastern UBNB, enhancing agricultural potential in these areas. However, wheat suitability faces considerable declines; under ssp585, the highly suitable area is expected to drop from 24.21% to 13.31% by the 2080s due to thermal and moisture stress. This study highlights the intricate relationship between agroclimatic variables and agricultural productivity. Integrating GAEZ and CMIP6 projections provides quantified insights into the impacts of climate change on wheat suitability. These findings offer a foundation for developing adaptive strategies to safeguard food security and optimize land use in vulnerable regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Wondimeneh Leul Demissew & Tadesse Terefe Zeleke & Kassahun Ture & Dejene K. Mengistu & Meaza Abera Fufa, 2025. "Agroclimatic Indicator Analysis Under Climate Change Conditions to Predict the Climatic Suitability for Wheat Production in the Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:5:p:525-:d:1602212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/5/525/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/5/525/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akpoti, Komlavi & Kabo-bah, Amos T. & Zwart, Sander J., 2019. "Agricultural land suitability analysis: State-of-the-art and outlooks for integration of climate change analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 172-208.
    2. Ariel Ortiz-Bobea & Toby R. Ault & Carlos M. Carrillo & Robert G. Chambers & David B. Lobell, 2020. "The Historical Impact of Anthropogenic Climate Change on Global Agricultural Productivity," Papers 2007.10415, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2021.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander C. Abajian & Tamma Carleton & Kyle C. Meng & Olivier Deschênes, 2025. "Quantifying the global climate feedback from energy-based adaptation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. John M. Kandulu & Alec Zuo & Sarah Wheeler & Theogene Dusingizimana & Mizeck G. G. Chagunda, 2024. "Influence of climate-smart technologies on the success of livestock donation programs for smallholder farmers in Rwanda," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 1-27, March.
    3. Khed, Vijayalaxmi D. & Jat, M. L. & Krishna, Vijesh V., 2022. "Incentives for Experimenting with Sustainable Intensification: Can Direct Payments to Farmers Help Diversify the Cropping Systems in South India?," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 0(Number 3), September.
    4. Mevlut Uyan & Jarosław Janus & Ela Ertunç, 2023. "Land Use Suitability Model for Grapevine ( Vitis vinifera L.) Cultivation Using the Best Worst Method: A Case Study from Ankara/Türkiye," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Parisa Alizadeh-Dehkordi & Behnam Kamkar & Alireza Nehbandani, 2024. "The effect of climate change on the future of rainfed wheat cultivation in Iran," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 687-709, January.
    6. Edgar Vladimir Gutiérrez Castorena & Gustavo Andrés Ramírez Gómez & Carlos Alberto Ortíz Solorio, 2023. "The Agricultural Potential of a Region with Semi-Dry, Warm and Temperate Subhumid Climate Diversity through Agroecological Zoning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, June.
    7. Adina-Eliza Croitoru & Titus Cristian Man & Sorin Daniel Vâtcă & Bela Kobulniczky & Vlad Stoian, 2020. "Refining the Spatial Scale for Maize Crop Agro-Climatological Suitability Conditions in a Region with Complex Topography towards a Smart and Sustainable Agriculture. Case Study: Central Romania (Cluj ," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.
    8. Akpoti, Komlavi & Groen, Thomas & Dossou-Yovo, Elliott & Kabo-bah, Amos T. & Zwart, Sander J., 2022. "Climate change-induced reduction in agricultural land suitability of West-Africa's inland valley landscapes," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    9. Irina Pilvere & Aleksejs Nipers & Agnese Krievina & Ilze Upite & Daniels Kotovs, 2022. "LASAM Model: An Important Tool in the Decision Support System for Policymakers and Farmers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-26, May.
    10. Subham Roy & Nimai Singha & Arghadeep Bose & Debanjan Basak & Indrajit Roy Chowdhury, 2023. "Multi-influencing factor (MIF) and RS–GIS-based determination of agriculture site suitability for achieving sustainable development of Sub-Himalayan region, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 7101-7133, July.
    11. Massimiliano Bordoni & Antonio Gambarani & Matteo Giganti & Valerio Vivaldi & Graziano Rossi & Paolo Bazzano & Claudia Meisina, 2025. "Present and Projected Suitability of Olive Trees in a Currently Marginal Territory in the Face of Climate Change: A Case Study from N-Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-25, February.
    12. Timuçin Everest & Hakan Koparan & Ali Sungur & Hasan Özcan, 2022. "An important tool against combat climate change: Land suitability assessment for canola (a case study: Çanakkale, NW Turkey)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 13137-13172, November.
    13. Shouqiang Yin & Jing Li & Jiaxin Liang & Kejing Jia & Zhen Yang & Yuan Wang, 2020. "Optimization of the Weighted Linear Combination Method for Agricultural Land Suitability Evaluation Considering Current Land Use and Regional Differences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-25, December.
    14. Siva K. Balasundram & Redmond R. Shamshiri & Shankarappa Sridhara & Nastaran Rizan, 2023. "The Role of Digital Agriculture in Mitigating Climate Change and Ensuring Food Security: An Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-23, March.
    15. Calum G. Turvey & Jiajun Du & Yurou He & Ariel Ortiz-Bobea, 2021. "A vulnerability index for priority targeting of agricultural crops under a changing climate," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 1-18, June.
    16. Yibin, Wang & Jian, Wang & Fei, Li & Xiaolin, Liu & Dan, Zhao, 2024. "Can the transition of multiple cropping systems affect the cropland change?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    17. Tingting Pan & Yu Zhang & Fengqin Yan & Fenzhen Su, 2023. "Collaborative Optimal Allocation of Urban Land Guide by Land Ecological Suitability: A Case Study of Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, March.
    18. Siyuan Wang & Minmin Zhao & Weicui Ding & Qiang Yang & Hao Li & Changqing Shao & Binghu Wang & Yi Liu, 2024. "Ecological Suitability Evaluation of City Construction Based on Landscape Ecological Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-16, October.
    19. World Bank, 2022. "Thailand Rural Income Diagnostic," World Bank Publications - Reports 38195, The World Bank Group.
    20. Ge Song & Hongmei Zhang, 2021. "Cultivated Land Use Layout Adjustment Based on Crop Planting Suitability: A Case Study of Typical Counties in Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:5:p:525-:d:1602212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.