IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i5p472-d1597259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Techno-Economic and Carbon Footprint Analysis of Semi-Extensive and Intensive Beef Farming

Author

Listed:
  • Angelo Frascarelli

    (Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Via Borgo XX Giugno 74, 06121 Perugia, Italy)

  • Stefano Ciliberti

    (Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Via Borgo XX Giugno 74, 06121 Perugia, Italy)

  • Sofia Maria Lilli

    (Ce.S.A.R. (Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, University of Perugia), Via Risorgimento 3/b, 06051 Deruta, Italy)

  • Paolo Pascolini

    (Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Via Borgo XX Giugno 74, 06121 Perugia, Italy)

  • Jacopo Gabriele Orlando

    (Impact and Sustainability Division—Aboca S.p.A. Società Agricola, Loc. Aboca 20, 52037 Sansepolcro, Italy)

  • Margherita Tiradritti

    (Impact and Sustainability Division—Aboca S.p.A. Società Agricola, Loc. Aboca 20, 52037 Sansepolcro, Italy)

Abstract

The environmental impact of beef cattle production varies significantly across farming systems, influenced by factors like feed, management practices, and land use. By applying the LCA perspective with “from cradle to farm gate” boundaries and using the CAP’2ER ® tool, this study evaluates the carbon footprint of two farming models in Italy: a semi-extensive cow-calf beef production and an intensive farm for calf fattening. The carbon footprint was calculated using two functional units: kilograms of live meat gross production (LMGP), and a monetary unit. The first model showed a lower carbon footprint, with 13.4 kg CO 2 eq/kg LMGP and 1.96 kg CO 2 eq/EUR, compared to the second one 19.2 kg CO 2 eq/kg LMGP and 5.20 kg CO 2 eq/EUR. The use of monetary value as a functional unit is rarely explored in the literature, since most studies have focused on weight-based metrics, favoring intensive systems with longer lifecycles compared to extensive farming. Furthermore, contrary to findings in the literature for semi-extensive systems like adaptive multi-paddock grazing, the tool used for the calculation did not detect any carbon sequestration. These findings highlight the need for further investigation into diverse functional units to assess the environmental and economic performance of farming systems. Expanding this approach could inform policies and consumer decisions, promoting sustainable beef production aligned with climate goals and the European Green Deal agenda.

Suggested Citation

  • Angelo Frascarelli & Stefano Ciliberti & Sofia Maria Lilli & Paolo Pascolini & Jacopo Gabriele Orlando & Margherita Tiradritti, 2025. "Comparative Techno-Economic and Carbon Footprint Analysis of Semi-Extensive and Intensive Beef Farming," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:5:p:472-:d:1597259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/5/472/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/5/472/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lambotte, Mathieu & De Cara, Stéphane & Brocas, Catherine & Bellassen, Valentin, 2021. "Carbon footprint and economic performance of dairy farms: The case of protected designation of origin farms in France," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    2. Stanley, Paige L. & Rowntree, Jason E. & Beede, David K. & DeLonge, Marcia S. & Hamm, Michael W., 2018. "Impacts of soil carbon sequestration on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in Midwestern USA beef finishing systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 249-258.
    3. Rotz, C. Alan & Asem-Hiablie, Senorpe & Place, Sara & Thoma, Greg, 2019. "Environmental footprints of beef cattle production in the United States," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1-13.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Recktenwald, Erin B. & Ehrhardt, Richard A., 2024. "Greenhouse gas emissions from a diversity of sheep production systems in the United States," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    2. Emilio Sabia & Sarah Kühl & Laura Flach & Christian Lambertz & Matthias Gauly, 2020. "Effect of Feed Concentrate Intake on the Environmental Impact of Dairy Cows in an Alpine Mountain Region Including Soil Carbon Sequestration and Effect on Biodiversity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Adriane Terezinha Schneider & Rosangela Rodrigues Dias & Mariany Costa Deprá & Darissa Alves Dutra & Richard Luan Silva Machado & Cristiano Ragagnin de Menezes & Leila Queiroz Zepka & Eduardo Jacob-Lo, 2024. "The Intersectionality Between Amazon and Commodities Production: A Close Look at Sustainability," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Oliver Lazarus & Sonali McDermid & Jennifer Jacquet, 2021. "The climate responsibilities of industrial meat and dairy producers," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Federica Salari & Chiara Marconi & Irene Sodi & Iolanda Altomonte & Mina Martini, 2025. "Environmental Sustainability of Dairy Cattle in Pasture-Based Systems vs. Confined Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-20, April.
    6. McGee, M. & Lenehan, C. & Crosson, P. & O'Riordan, E.G. & Kelly, A.K. & Moran, L. & Moloney, A.P., 2022. "Performance, meat quality, profitability, and greenhouse gas emissions of suckler bulls from pasture-based compared to an indoor high-concentrate weanling-to-beef finishing system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    7. Thorn, Alexandra M. & Baker, Michael J. & Peters, Christian J., 2021. "Estimating biological capacity for grass-finished ruminant meat production in New England and New York," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    8. Bellassen Valentin & Drut Marion & Antonioli Federico & Brečić Ružica & Donati Michele & Ferrer-Pérez Hugo & Gauvrit Lisa & Hoang Viet & Knutsen Steinnes Kamilla & Lilavanichakul Apichaya & Majewski E, 2021. "The Carbon and Land Footprint of Certified Food Products," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 19(2), pages 113-126, December.
    9. Fabiellen C. Pereira & Stuart Charters & Carol M. S. Smith & Thomas M. R. Maxwell & Pablo Gregorini, 2023. "A Geospatial Modelling Approach to Assess the Capability of High-Country Stations in Delivering Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, June.
    10. Bonnin, Dennis & Tabacco, Ernesto & Borreani, Giorgio, 2021. "Variability of greenhouse gas emissions and economic performances on 10 Piedmontese beef farms in North Italy," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    11. Clifford, McKenna E. & McKendree, Melissa G.S. & Hodbod, Jennifer & Swanson, Janice C., 2020. "Adaptive Multi-Paddock Grazing: Cattle Producer Survey Results," Staff Paper Series 307453, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    12. Elio Romano & Rocco Roma & Flavio Tidona & Giorgio Giraffa & Andrea Bragaglio, 2021. "Dairy Farms and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): The Allocation Criterion Useful to Estimate Undesirable Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-24, April.
    13. Bardsley, Nicholas, 2021. "Recent Advances in Biofarming Show Potential for Rapid Soil Restoration, with Carbon, Health and Livelihoods Benefits," MPRA Paper 121184, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Vogel, Everton & Beber, Caetano Luiz, 2021. "Sustainable Intensification Strategies for GHG Mitigation Among Heterogeneous Dairy Farms in Paraná, Brazil," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315219, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Subash Dahal & Dorcas Franklin & Anish Subedi & Miguel Cabrera & Dennis Hancock & Kishan Mahmud & Laura Ney & Cheolwoo Park & Deepak Mishra, 2020. "Strategic Grazing in Beef-Pastures for Improved Soil Health and Reduced Runoff-Nitrate-A Step towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.
    16. Jessica Gilreath & Tryon Wickersham & Jason Sawyer, 2022. "Comparison of Methodologies Used to Estimate Enteric Methane Emissions and Warming Impact from 1920 to 2020 for U.S. Beef Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    17. Ann Norderhaug & Karina E. Clemmensen & Paul Kardol & Anna Gudrun Thorhallsdottir & Iulie Aslaksen, 2023. "Carbon sequestration potential and the multiple functions of Nordic grasslands," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(5), pages 1-13, May.
    18. Javier García-Gudiño & Alessandra N. T. R. Monteiro & Sandrine Espagnol & Isabel Blanco-Penedo & Florence Garcia-Launay, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment of Iberian Traditional Pig Production System in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    19. Danqi Luo & Gang Xu & Jiao Luo & Xia Cui & Shengping Shang & Haiyan Qian, 2022. "Integrated Carbon Footprint and Economic Performance of Five Types of Dominant Cropping Systems in China’s Semiarid Zone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    20. Cécile M. Godde & Imke J. M. Boer & Erasmus zu Ermgassen & Mario Herrero & Corina E. Middelaar & Adrian Muller & Elin Röös & Christian Schader & Pete Smith & Hannah H. E. Zanten & Tara Garnett, 2020. "Soil carbon sequestration in grazing systems: managing expectations," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 161(3), pages 385-391, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:5:p:472-:d:1597259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.