IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i17p1831-d1736193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Detection of Neonatal Calf Diarrhea Using Suckle Pressure and Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Beibei Xu

    (Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA)

  • Claira R. Seely

    (Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA)

  • Tapomayukh Bhattacharjee

    (Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA)

  • Taika von Konigslow

    (Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA)

Abstract

Neonatal calf diarrhea (NCD) remains one of the most prevalent and economically burdensome health challenges in preweaned calves, leading to compromised growth, increased morbidity, and high mortality rates worldwide. While traditional methods such as physical examination and clinical health scoring are widely used, they often require trained personnel, are resource-intensive, and are prone to subjectivity, which limits their scalability in large dairy operations. This observational cohort study investigated the feasibility of using suckle pressure measurement combined with machine learning (ML) techniques for NCD detection. A total of 51 female Holstein calves on a commercial dairy farm were enrolled at birth and health scored daily from 1 to 21 days of age. Suckle pressures were measured at 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, and 21 days, as well as daily following NCD diagnosis until fecal consistency returned to normal. Pressure measurements were captured using impression film-wrapped nipples, producing 349 images, of which 54 were from calves diagnosed with NCD. Image features, including pixel density, color saturation, entropy, and histogram-based features, were extracted for analysis. Multiple ML classifiers—Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Easy Ensemble (EE)—were applied to detect NCD status based on image features. The EE classifier achieved the best detection performance, with an accuracy of 0.90, precision of 0.64, and recall of 0.82, effectively handling data imbalance. Notably, the results also demonstrated that NCD onset could be predicted up to one day prior to clinical manifestation by training classifiers on pre-symptomatic suckle pressure data and testing on post-onset data. The EE classifier also outperformed other models in this early prediction window, with an accuracy of 0.74, precision of 0.67, and recall of 0.70. The results of our preliminary study suggest that suckle pressure may offer a novel, non-invasive approach for precision health monitoring in dairy systems, enabling timely intervention to reduce disease severity, improve calf health, and minimize economic losses.

Suggested Citation

  • Beibei Xu & Claira R. Seely & Tapomayukh Bhattacharjee & Taika von Konigslow, 2025. "Detection of Neonatal Calf Diarrhea Using Suckle Pressure and Machine Learning," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:17:p:1831-:d:1736193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/17/1831/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/17/1831/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Takaya Saito & Marc Rehmsmeier, 2015. "The Precision-Recall Plot Is More Informative than the ROC Plot When Evaluating Binary Classifiers on Imbalanced Datasets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Charles R. Harris & K. Jarrod Millman & Stéfan J. Walt & Ralf Gommers & Pauli Virtanen & David Cournapeau & Eric Wieser & Julian Taylor & Sebastian Berg & Nathaniel J. Smith & Robert Kern & Matti Picu, 2020. "Array programming with NumPy," Nature, Nature, vol. 585(7825), pages 357-362, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Geeraert, Joke & Rocha, Luis E.C. & Vandeviver, Christophe, 2024. "The impact of violent behavior on co-offender selection: Evidence of behavioral homophily," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. Furqan Dar & Samuel R. Cohen & Diana M. Mitrea & Aaron H. Phillips & Gergely Nagy & Wellington C. Leite & Christopher B. Stanley & Jeong-Mo Choi & Richard W. Kriwacki & Rohit V. Pappu, 2024. "Biomolecular condensates form spatially inhomogeneous network fluids," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Christopher J Greenwood & George J Youssef & Primrose Letcher & Jacqui A Macdonald & Lauryn J Hagg & Ann Sanson & Jenn Mcintosh & Delyse M Hutchinson & John W Toumbourou & Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz &, 2020. "A comparison of penalised regression methods for informing the selection of predictive markers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, November.
    4. López Pérez, Mario & Mansilla Corona, Ricardo, 2022. "Ordinal synchronization and typical states in high-frequency digital markets," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 598(C).
    5. Le, Hong Hanh & Viviani, Jean-Laurent, 2018. "Predicting bank failure: An improvement by implementing a machine-learning approach to classical financial ratios," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 16-25.
    6. Jessica M. Vanslambrouck & Sean B. Wilson & Ker Sin Tan & Ella Groenewegen & Rajeev Rudraraju & Jessica Neil & Kynan T. Lawlor & Sophia Mah & Michelle Scurr & Sara E. Howden & Kanta Subbarao & Melissa, 2022. "Enhanced metanephric specification to functional proximal tubule enables toxicity screening and infectious disease modelling in kidney organoids," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, December.
    7. Dennis Bontempi & Leonard Nuernberg & Suraj Pai & Deepa Krishnaswamy & Vamsi Thiriveedhi & Ahmed Hosny & Raymond H. Mak & Keyvan Farahani & Ron Kikinis & Andrey Fedorov & Hugo J. W. L. Aerts, 2024. "End-to-end reproducible AI pipelines in radiology using the cloud," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, December.
    8. Pablo García-Risueño, 2025. "Historical Simulation Systematically Underestimates the Expected Shortfall," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-12, January.
    9. Lauren L. Porter & Allen K. Kim & Swechha Rimal & Loren L. Looger & Ananya Majumdar & Brett D. Mensh & Mary R. Starich & Marie-Paule Strub, 2022. "Many dissimilar NusG protein domains switch between α-helix and β-sheet folds," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    10. João Chang Junior & Fábio Binuesa & Luiz Fernando Caneo & Aida Luiza Ribeiro Turquetto & Elisandra Cristina Trevisan Calvo Arita & Aline Cristina Barbosa & Alfredo Manoel da Silva Fernandes & Evelinda, 2020. "Improving preoperative risk-of-death prediction in surgery congenital heart defects using artificial intelligence model: A pilot study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, September.
    11. Ali Rezaei & Virág Kocsis-Jutka & Zeynep I. Gunes & Qing Zeng & Georg Kislinger & Franz Bauernschmitt & Huseyin Berkcan Isilgan & Laura R. Parisi & Tuğberk Kaya & Sören Franzenburg & Jonas Koppenbrink, 2025. "Correction of dysregulated lipid metabolism normalizes gene expression in oligodendrocytes and prolongs lifespan in female poly-GA C9orf72 mice," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Oren Amsalem & Hidehiko Inagaki & Jianing Yu & Karel Svoboda & Ran Darshan, 2024. "Sub-threshold neuronal activity and the dynamical regime of cerebral cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Matthew Rosenblatt & Link Tejavibulya & Rongtao Jiang & Stephanie Noble & Dustin Scheinost, 2024. "Data leakage inflates prediction performance in connectome-based machine learning models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Sayedali Shetab Boushehri & Katharina Essig & Nikolaos-Kosmas Chlis & Sylvia Herter & Marina Bacac & Fabian J. Theis & Elke Glasmacher & Carsten Marr & Fabian Schmich, 2023. "Explainable machine learning for profiling the immunological synapse and functional characterization of therapeutic antibodies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Arthur De Sá Ferreira & Ney Meziat-Filho & Ana Paula Antunes Ferreira, 2021. "Double threshold receiver operating characteristic plot for three-modal continuous predictors," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 2231-2245, September.
    16. Venkat Ram Reddy Ganuthula & Krishna Kumar Balaraman & Nimish Vohra, 2025. "Hedonic Adaptation in the Age of AI: A Perspective on Diminishing Satisfaction Returns in Technology Adoption," Papers 2503.08074, arXiv.org.
    17. Khaled Akkad & David He, 2023. "A dynamic mode decomposition based deep learning technique for prognostics," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(5), pages 2207-2224, June.
    18. Masabho P Milali & Samson S Kiware & Nicodem J Govella & Fredros Okumu & Naveen Bansal & Serdar Bozdag & Jacques D Charlwood & Marta F Maia & Sheila B Ogoma & Floyd E Dowell & George F Corliss & Maggy, 2020. "An autoencoder and artificial neural network-based method to estimate parity status of wild mosquitoes from near-infrared spectra," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, June.
    19. Romain Fournier & Zoi Tsangalidou & David Reich & Pier Francesco Palamara, 2023. "Haplotype-based inference of recent effective population size in modern and ancient DNA samples," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Matt C. J. Denton & Luke D. Smith & Wenhao Xu & Jodeci Pugsley & Amelia Toghill & Daniel R. Kattnig, 2024. "Magnetosensitivity of tightly bound radical pairs in cryptochrome is enabled by the quantum Zeno effect," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:17:p:1831-:d:1736193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.