IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i2p323-d1049749.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Energy Crop Monocultures and Sewage Sludge Fertiliser on Soils and Earthworm Community Attributes

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Mazur-Pączka

    (Department of the Basis of Agriculture and Waste Management, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Land Management and Environmental Protection, College of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Cwiklinskiej 1a, 35-601 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Grzegorz Pączka

    (Department of the Basis of Agriculture and Waste Management, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Land Management and Environmental Protection, College of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Cwiklinskiej 1a, 35-601 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Mariola Garczyńska

    (Department of the Basis of Agriculture and Waste Management, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Land Management and Environmental Protection, College of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Cwiklinskiej 1a, 35-601 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Marcin Jaromin

    (Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Faculty of Chemistry, Rzeszow University of Technology, 6 Powstancow Warszawy Avenue, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Edmund Hajduk

    (Department of Soil Science, Chemistry of Environment and Hydrology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Land Management and Environmental Protection, College of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Zelwerowicza 8b, 35-601 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Joanna Kostecka

    (Department of the Basis of Agriculture and Waste Management, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Land Management and Environmental Protection, College of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Cwiklinskiej 1a, 35-601 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Kevin R. Butt

    (School of Natural Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Natural Sciences, Preston PR 1 2HE, UK)

Abstract

Biomass is one of the most significant renewable energy sources. Doubts arise from large-area plantations of energy monocultures, which can lead to the depletion of, and a decrease in, soil biodiversity. Community association analyses of Lumbricidae may help to indicate environmental change. Therefore, the study objectives were to determine the qualitative and quantitative diversity of Lumbricids in plantations of energy crops—basket willow ( Salix viminalis L.), foxglove tree ( Paulownia tomentosa Steud.), and black locust ( Robinia pseudoacacia L.)—by investigating the following cultivation treatments: SV and SVSS— S. viminalis without ( w / o ) and with the addition of sewage sludge to the soil (+SS); PT and PTSS— P. tomentosa w / o and + SS; RP and RPSS— R. pseudoacacia w / o and +SS; and MW—meadow community. A significantly higher density ( p < 0.05) and biomass ( p < 0.05) of earthworms were found in the SV and SVSS plantations than in other sites. The application of sewage sludge contributed to a significant increase in the mean number and biomass of all Lumbricids within cultivations of S. viminalis and R. pseudoacacia , which were significantly higher than those in the control site. This work suggests that woody energy crop production with an appropriate selection of plants and fertilisation can be a favourable habitat for the development of earthworm populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Mazur-Pączka & Grzegorz Pączka & Mariola Garczyńska & Marcin Jaromin & Edmund Hajduk & Joanna Kostecka & Kevin R. Butt, 2023. "Effects of Energy Crop Monocultures and Sewage Sludge Fertiliser on Soils and Earthworm Community Attributes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:323-:d:1049749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/2/323/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/2/323/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rowe, Rebecca L. & Street, Nathaniel R. & Taylor, Gail, 2009. "Identifying potential environmental impacts of large-scale deployment of dedicated bioenergy crops in the UK," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 271-290, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Mazur-Pączka & Kevin R. Butt & Mariola Garczyńska & Marcin Jaromin & Edmund Hajduk & Joanna Kostecka & Grzegorz Pączka, 2024. "Comparative Effects of No-dig and Conventional Cultivation with Vermicompost Fertilization on Earthworm Community Parameters and Soil Physicochemical Condition," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David O. Yawson & Barry J. Mulholland & Tom Ball & Michael O. Adu & Sushil Mohan & Philip J. White, 2017. "Effect of Climate and Agricultural Land Use Changes on UK Feed Barley Production and Food Security to the 2050s," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Robert Perlack, Robert & Eaton, Lawrence & Thurhollow, Anthony & Langholtz, Matt & De La Torre Ugarte, Daniel, 2011. "US billion-ton update: biomass supply for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry," MPRA Paper 89324, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2011.
    3. van der Hilst, F. & Lesschen, J.P. & van Dam, J.M.C. & Riksen, M. & Verweij, P.A. & Sanders, J.P.M. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2012. "Spatial variation of environmental impacts of regional biomass chains," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 2053-2069.
    4. Manzone, Marco & Calvo, Angela, 2016. "Energy and CO2 analysis of poplar and maize crops for biomass production in north Italy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 675-681.
    5. Chadwick, Dara T. & McDonnell, Kevin P. & Brennan, Liam P. & Fagan, Colette C. & Everard, Colm D., 2014. "Evaluation of infrared techniques for the assessment of biomass and biofuel quality parameters and conversion technology processes: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 672-681.
    6. Hammond, Jim & Shackley, Simon & Sohi, Saran & Brownsort, Peter, 2011. "Prospective life cycle carbon abatement for pyrolysis biochar systems in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2646-2655, May.
    7. Kern, Jürgen & Hellebrand, Hans Jürgen & Scholz, Volkhard & Linke, Bernd, 2010. "Assessment of nitrogen fertilization for the CO2 balance during the production of poplar and rye," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(5), pages 1453-1460, June.
    8. Kamil Roman & Michał Roman & Dominika Szadkowska & Jan Szadkowski & Emilia Grzegorzewska, 2021. "Evaluation of Physical and Chemical Parameters According to Energetic Willow ( Salix viminalis L.) Cultivation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    9. Tate, Graham & Mbzibain, Aurelian & Ali, Shaukat, 2012. "A comparison of the drivers influencing farmers' adoption of enterprises associated with renewable energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 400-409.
    10. J. S. Wu & H. K. Tseng & J. C. Ferrell & X. Liu, 2017. "Transforming Waste Management Operations to Green Energy Initiatives: Opportunities and Challenges," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 7(3), pages 50-57.
    11. Adams, P.W.R. & Lindegaard, K., 2016. "A critical appraisal of the effectiveness of UK perennial energy crops policy since 1990," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 188-202.
    12. Dias, Goretty M. & Ayer, Nathan W. & Kariyapperuma, Kumudinie & Thevathasan, Naresh & Gordon, Andrew & Sidders, Derek & Johannesson, Gudmundur H., 2017. "Life cycle assessment of thermal energy production from short-rotation willow biomass in Southern Ontario, Canada," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 343-352.
    13. Thornley, Patricia & Upham, Paul & Tomei, Julia, 2009. "Sustainability constraints on UK bioenergy development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 5623-5635, December.
    14. Raslavičius, Laurencas & Kučinskas, Vytautas & Jasinskas, Algirdas, 2013. "The prospects of energy forestry and agro-residues in the Lithuania's domestic energy supply," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 419-431.
    15. Bocquého, G. & Jacquet, F., 2010. "The adoption of switchgrass and miscanthus by farmers: Impact of liquidity constraints and risk preferences," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 2598-2607, May.
    16. Anja Starick & Ralf-Uwe Syrbe & Reimund Steinhäußer & Gerd Lupp & Bettina Matzdorf & Peter Zander, 2014. "Scenarios of bioenergy provision: technological developments in a landscape context and their social effects," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 575-594, June.
    17. Sheng Yang & Timothy A. Volk & Marie-Odile P. Fortier, 2020. "Willow Biomass Crops Are a Carbon Negative or Low-Carbon Feedstock Depending on Prior Land Use and Transportation Distances to End Users," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-26, August.
    18. Ali Sabyrzhan & Gulnara Balgimbekova & Viktor Shestak, 2021. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Economic and legal regulation of the use and development of renewable energy sources," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 595-610, December.
    19. Convery, I. & Robson, D. & Ottitsch, A. & Long, M., 2012. "The willingness of farmers to engage with bioenergy and woody biomass production: A regional case study from Cumbria," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 293-300.
    20. Littlewood, Jade & Murphy, Richard J. & Wang, Lei, 2013. "Importance of policy support and feedstock prices on economic feasibility of bioethanol production from wheat straw in the UK," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 291-300.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:323-:d:1049749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.