IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i10p1962-d1255471.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Yield Adaptability and Stability in Field Pea Genotypes Using AMMI, GGE, and GYT Biplot Analyses

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Yang

    (Institute of Food Crops, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650205, China)

  • Alaa A. Soliman

    (Institute of Food Crops, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650205, China
    Food Legumes Research Department, Field Crops Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza 12619, Egypt)

  • Chaoqin Hu

    (Institute of Food Crops, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650205, China)

  • Feng Yang

    (Institute of Food Crops, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650205, China)

  • Meiyuan Lv

    (Institute of Food Crops, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650205, China)

  • Haitian Yu

    (Institute of Food Crops, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650205, China)

  • Yubao Wang

    (Institute of Food Crops, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650205, China)

  • Aiqing Zheng

    (Institute of Food Crops, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650205, China)

  • Zhengming Dai

    (Institute of Food Crops, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650205, China)

  • Qiong Li

    (Institute of Food Crops, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650205, China)

  • Yongsheng Tang

    (Qujing Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Qujing 655000, China)

  • Jiangu Yang

    (Lijiang Gucheng District Agricultural Technology Extension Center, Lijiang 674199, China)

  • Yurong Zhang

    (Yuxi Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Yuxi 653100, China)

  • Wenwu Niu

    (Baoshan Agricultural Technology Comprehensive Service Center, Baoshan 678000, China)

  • Liping Wang

    (Institute of Food Crops, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650205, China)

  • Yuhua He

    (Institute of Food Crops, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650205, China)

Abstract

Pea ( Pisum sativum L.) is a vital leguminous crop farmed worldwide. Pea plays an essential role in China’s crop rotation system, but the major restrictions to its cultivation are stability and low yield. Breeding for promising cultivars with a significantly high yield will impact the sustainability of pea production. Additionally, diverse environment trials are crucial in determining the best genotype. The new cultivar “Yunwan 52” was developed by hybridization and subsequently evaluated through yield trials among six pea genotypes across 14 environments during the 2016–2018 growing seasons. The results showed that the average yield of “Yunwan 52” for all tested environments was 2.64 t ha −1 compared to the control cultivar (Yunwan 18, 1.83 t ha −1 ). Analysis of AMMI variance showed significant differences ( p < 0.01) between genotypes, environments, and their interaction. Based on the GGE biplot, some genotypes possessed wide and narrow adaptability to environments, such as Yunwan 52 was considered the most stable and ideal gen-otype across all tested environments. GYT biplot analysis also revealed that this realized cultivar was a superior and stable genotype that can be identified visually by combining all characters in breeding programs. Yunwan 52 distinguishes with purple blossoms and seed coat peas. It is possible to infer that the newly released cultivar “Yunwan 52” has outstanding yield performance and wide adaptability to multiple environmental conditions (resilience to abiotic stress). It will contribute to developing nutritional pea genotypes and increase pea production in irrigated areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Yang & Alaa A. Soliman & Chaoqin Hu & Feng Yang & Meiyuan Lv & Haitian Yu & Yubao Wang & Aiqing Zheng & Zhengming Dai & Qiong Li & Yongsheng Tang & Jiangu Yang & Yurong Zhang & Wenwu Niu & Liping , 2023. "Yield Adaptability and Stability in Field Pea Genotypes Using AMMI, GGE, and GYT Biplot Analyses," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:10:p:1962-:d:1255471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/10/1962/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/10/1962/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yoshua Liberty Filio & Haris Maulana & Reviana Aulia & Tarkus Suganda & Trixie Almira Ulimaz & Virda Aziza & Vergel Concibido & Agung Karuniawan, 2023. "Evaluation of Indonesian Butterfly Pea ( Clitoria ternatea L.) Using Stability Analysis and Sustainability Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.
    2. MacWilliam, S. & Wismer, M. & Kulshreshtha, S., 2014. "Life cycle and economic assessment of Western Canadian pulse systems: The inclusion of pulses in crop rotations," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 43-53.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Revoyron, Eva & Le Bail, Marianne & Meynard, Jean-Marc & Gunnarsson, Anita & Seghetti, Marco & Colombo, Luca, 2022. "Diversity and drivers of crop diversification pathways of European farms," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    2. Alain Carpentier & Ibirénoyé Honoré Romaric Sodjahin & Rémy Ballot, 2022. "On the economics of crop rotation diversification. Valuing pre crop and cropping system effects and accounting for opportunity costs," Post-Print hal-04793152, HAL.
    3. Nicole Bamber & Ian Turner & Baishali Dutta & Mohammed Davoud Heidari & Nathan Pelletier, 2023. "Consequential Life Cycle Assessment of Grain and Oilseed Crops: Review and Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-28, April.
    4. Kofi Armah Boakye-Yiadom & Alessio Ilari & Valentina Bisinella & Ester Foppa Pedretti & Daniele Duca, 2023. "Environmental Impact Assessment of Frozen Peas Production from Conventional and Organic Farming in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Sara Martinez & Jose Luis Gabriel & Sergio Alvarez & Anibal Capuano & Maria del Mar Delgado, 2021. "Integral Assessment of Organic Fertilization on a Camelina sativa Rotation under Mediterranean Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Nikouei, Alireza & Asgharipour, Mohammad Reza & Marzban, Zahra, 2022. "Modeling land allocation to produce crops under economic and environmental goals in Iran: a multi-objective programming approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 471(C).
    7. Dwinita Wikan Utami & Ajang Maruapey & Haris Maulana & Parlin Halomon Sinaga & Susilawati Basith & Agung Karuniawan, 2023. "The Sustainability Index and Other Stability Analyses for Evaluating Superior Fe-Tolerant Rice ( Oryza sativa L.)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Heidari, Mohammad Davoud & Turner, Ian & Ardestani-Jaafari, Amir & Pelletier, Nathan, 2021. "Operations research for environmental assessment of crop-livestock production systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    9. MacWilliam, Susan & Parker, David & Marinangeli, Christopher P.F. & Trémorin, Denis, 2018. "A meta-analysis approach to examining the greenhouse gas implications of including dry peas (Pisum sativum L.) and lentils (Lens culinaris M.) in crop rotations in western Canada," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 101-110.
    10. Haris Maulana & Yudithia Maxiselly & Yuyun Yuwariah & Dedi Ruswandi, 2023. "Heritability and Selection Using GGE Biplots and the Sustainability Index (SI) of Maize Mutants under Different Cropping Systems in Upland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-22, April.
    11. Madara Darguza & Zinta Gaile, 2023. "The Productivity of Crop Rotation Depending on the Included Plants and Soil Tillage," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:10:p:1962-:d:1255471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.