IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i9p1406-d908084.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Genomic Prediction of Wheat Grain Yield Using Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Manisha Sanjay Sirsat

    (Department of Data Management and Risk Analysis, InnovPlantProtect, 7350-478 Elvas, Portugal)

  • Paula Rodrigues Oblessuc

    (Department of Protection of Specific Crops, InnovPlantProtect, 7350-478 Elvas, Portugal)

  • Ricardo S. Ramiro

    (Department of Data Management and Risk Analysis, InnovPlantProtect, 7350-478 Elvas, Portugal)

Abstract

Genomic Prediction (GP) is a powerful approach for inferring complex phenotypes from genetic markers. GP is critical for improving grain yield, particularly for staple crops such as wheat and rice, which are crucial to feeding the world. While machine learning (ML) models have recently started to be applied in GP, it is often unclear what are the best algorithms and how their results are affected by the feature selection (FS) methods. Here, we compared ML and deep learning (DL) algorithms with classical Bayesian approaches, across a range of different FS methods, for their performance in predicting wheat grain yield (in three datasets). Model performance was generally more affected by the prediction algorithm than the FS method. Among all models, the best performance was obtained for tree-based ML methods (random forests and gradient boosting) and for classical Bayesian methods. However, the latter was prone to fitting problems. This issue was also observed for models developed with features selected by BayesA, the only Bayesian FS method used here. Nonetheless, the three other FS methods led to models with no fitting problem but similar performance. Thus, our results indicate that the choice of prediction algorithm is more important than the choice of FS method for developing highly predictive models. Moreover, we concluded that random forests and gradient boosting algorithms generate highly predictive and robust wheat grain yield GP models.

Suggested Citation

  • Manisha Sanjay Sirsat & Paula Rodrigues Oblessuc & Ricardo S. Ramiro, 2022. "Genomic Prediction of Wheat Grain Yield Using Machine Learning," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-12, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1406-:d:908084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1406/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1406/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rahi Jain & Wei Xu, 2021. "HDSI: High dimensional selection with interactions algorithm on feature selection and testing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Park, Trevor & Casella, George, 2008. "The Bayesian Lasso," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103, pages 681-686, June.
    3. Hui Zou & Trevor Hastie, 2005. "Addendum: Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 768-768, November.
    4. Hui Zou & Trevor Hastie, 2005. "Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(2), pages 301-320, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu-Zhu Tian & Man-Lai Tang & Wai-Sum Chan & Mao-Zai Tian, 2021. "Bayesian bridge-randomized penalized quantile regression for ordinal longitudinal data, with application to firm’s bond ratings," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 1289-1319, June.
    2. Yagli, Gokhan Mert & Yang, Dazhi & Srinivasan, Dipti, 2019. "Automatic hourly solar forecasting using machine learning models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 487-498.
    3. Ricardo P. Masini & Marcelo C. Medeiros & Eduardo F. Mendes, 2023. "Machine learning advances for time series forecasting," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 76-111, February.
    4. Korobilis, Dimitris, 2013. "Hierarchical shrinkage priors for dynamic regressions with many predictors," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 43-59.
    5. Philip Kostov & Thankom Arun & Samuel Annim, 2014. "Financial Services to the Unbanked: the case of the Mzansi intervention in South Africa," Contemporary Economics, Vizja University, vol. 8(2), June.
    6. Ruggieri, Eric & Lawrence, Charles E., 2012. "On efficient calculations for Bayesian variable selection," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 1319-1332.
    7. Olivier Collignon & Jeongseop Han & Hyungmi An & Seungyoung Oh & Youngjo Lee, 2018. "Comparison of the modified unbounded penalty and the LASSO to select predictive genes of response to chemotherapy in breast cancer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Park, Seongoh & Kim, Joungyoun & Wang, Xinlei & Lim, Johan, 2024. "Variable selection in Bayesian multiple instance regression using shotgun stochastic search," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    9. Gilles Charmet & Louis-Gautier Tran & Jérôme Auzanneau & Renaud Rincent & Sophie Bouchet, 2020. "BWGS: A R package for genomic selection and its application to a wheat breeding programme," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, April.
    10. Scutari Marco & Mackay Ian & Balding David, 2013. "Improving the efficiency of genomic selection," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 12(4), pages 517-527, August.
    11. Posch, Konstantin & Arbeiter, Maximilian & Pilz, Juergen, 2020. "A novel Bayesian approach for variable selection in linear regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    12. Tanin Sirimongkolkasem & Reza Drikvandi, 2019. "On Regularisation Methods for Analysis of High Dimensional Data," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 737-763, December.
    13. Mogliani, Matteo & Simoni, Anna, 2021. "Bayesian MIDAS penalized regressions: Estimation, selection, and prediction," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 833-860.
    14. Christis Katsouris, 2023. "High Dimensional Time Series Regression Models: Applications to Statistical Learning Methods," Papers 2308.16192, arXiv.org.
    15. Roberto Casarin & Fausto Corradin & Francesco Ravazzolo & Nguyen Domenico Sartore & Wing-Keung Wong, 2020. "A Scoring Rule for Factor and Autoregressive Models Under Misspecification," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 24(2), pages 66-103, June.
    16. Daniel Felix Ahelegbey & Monica Billio & Roberto Casarin, 2016. "Sparse Graphical Vector Autoregression: A Bayesian Approach," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 123-124, pages 333-361.
    17. Bergersen Linn Cecilie & Glad Ingrid K. & Lyng Heidi, 2011. "Weighted Lasso with Data Integration," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-29, August.
    18. van Erp, Sara & Oberski, Daniel L. & Mulder, Joris, 2018. "Shrinkage priors for Bayesian penalized regression," OSF Preprints cg8fq, Center for Open Science.
    19. Kshitij Khare & Malay Ghosh, 2022. "MCMC Convergence for Global-Local Shrinkage Priors," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 20(1), pages 211-234, September.
    20. Sakae Oya, 2021. "A Bayesian Graphical Approach for Large-Scale Portfolio Management with Fewer Historical Data," Papers 2103.05880, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2022.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1406-:d:908084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.