IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i6p819-d833546.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying Different Magnetic Water Densities as Irrigation for Aeroponically and Hydroponically Grown Strawberries

Author

Listed:
  • Tarek Mahrous Korany Mohamed

    (School of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
    Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza P.O. Box 12613, Egypt)

  • Jianmin Gao

    (School of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Mohamed E. Abuarab

    (Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza P.O. Box 12613, Egypt)

  • Mohamed Kassem

    (Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza P.O. Box 12613, Egypt)

  • Essam Wasef

    (Irrigation and Drainage Department, Agriculture Engineering Research Institute, Giza P.O. Box 12613, Egypt)

  • Wessam El-Ssawy

    (Irrigation and Drainage Department, Agriculture Engineering Research Institute, Giza P.O. Box 12613, Egypt)

Abstract

Due to the scarcity of water, it is necessary to develop an environmentally friendly method for increasing water productivity and crop production. An experiment was conducted to assess the effects of different magnetic levels (magnetic water level 1 (MWL 1) = 3800 Gauss, magnetic water level 2 (MWL 2) = 5250 Gauss, and magnetic water level 3 (MWL 3) = 6300 Gauss, as well as normal water (NW) as a control) in combination with three soilless culture systems (a nutrient film technique (NFT) hydroponics system, a tower aeroponics system, and a pyramidal aeroponics system. The results showed that the utilization of magnetic water had significant effects on the yield and growth of strawberry plants The tower aeroponic system under MWL 3 produced the highest yield and water productivity, with increases of 80.9% and 89%, respectively, over the control. The tower aeroponic system under MWL 3 produced the highest yield and water productivity, with increases of 80.9% and 89%, respectively, over the control. In addition, as compared to the NW, the NFT system increased yield and water productivity by 71.1% and 79.3%, respectively, whilst the pyramidal system increased yield and water productivity by 66.87% and 82%, respectively. Furthermore, when compared to the control, the combination of the NFT system and magnetic water level 3 (MWL 3) resulted in the most leaves, largest stem diameter, and largest leaf area of the strawberry plants resulted in the most leaves, stem diameter, and leaf area of strawberry plants. In comparison to all other treatments, this combination produced the best fruit quality and yield, as well as its constituents, such as titratable acidity, total soluble solids, and fruit hardness. This study found that combining magnetic therapy with soilless culture techniques resulted in increased yield and water productivity. In addition, water and fertigation solution usage in the NFT, tower, and pyramidal systems dropped by 4.8%, 6%, and 4.8%, respectively. Furthermore, it enhanced plant morphology and plant quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Tarek Mahrous Korany Mohamed & Jianmin Gao & Mohamed E. Abuarab & Mohamed Kassem & Essam Wasef & Wessam El-Ssawy, 2022. "Applying Different Magnetic Water Densities as Irrigation for Aeroponically and Hydroponically Grown Strawberries," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:6:p:819-:d:833546
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/6/819/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/6/819/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sato, Toshio & Qadir, Manzoor & Yamamoto, Sadahiro & Endo, Tsuneyoshi & Zahoor, Ahmad, 2013. "Global, regional, and country level need for data on wastewater generation, treatment, and use," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 1-13.
    2. Grewal, Harsharn S. & Maheshwari, Basant & Parks, Sophie E., 2011. "Water and nutrient use efficiency of a low-cost hydroponic greenhouse for a cucumber crop: An Australian case study," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(5), pages 841-846, March.
    3. Maheshwari, Basant L. & Grewal, Harsharn Singh, 2009. "Magnetic treatment of irrigation water: Its effects on vegetable crop yield and water productivity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(8), pages 1229-1236, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. M. Aishwarya & R. Vidhya, 2023. "Study on the Efficiency of a Hydroponic Treatment for Removing Organic Loading from Wastewater and Its Application as a Nutrient for the “ Amaranthus campestris ” Plant for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-13, May.
    2. David Kocman & Simon J. Wilson & Helen M. Amos & Kevin H. Telmer & Frits Steenhuisen & Elsie M. Sunderland & Robert P. Mason & Peter Outridge & Milena Horvat, 2017. "Toward an Assessment of the Global Inventory of Present-Day Mercury Releases to Freshwater Environments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Li, Sien & Kang, Shaozhong & Zhang, Lu & Du, Taisheng & Tong, Ling & Ding, Risheng & Guo, Weihua & Zhao, Peng & Chen, Xia & Xiao, Huan, 2015. "Ecosystem water use efficiency for a sparse vineyard in arid northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 24-33.
    4. Zvi Baum & Ruslana Rachel Palatnik & Iddo Kan & Mickey Rapaport-Rom, 2016. "Economic Impacts of Water Scarcity Under Diverse Water Salinities," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 2(01), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Katsoulas, N. & Sapounas, A. & De Zwart, F. & Dieleman, J.A. & Stanghellini, C., 2015. "Reducing ventilation requirements in semi-closed greenhouses increases water use efficiency," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 90-99.
    6. Zhou, Beibei & Liang, Chaofan & Chen, Xiaopeng & Ye, Sitan & Peng, Yao & Yang, Lu & Duan, Manli & Wang, Xingpeng, 2022. "Magnetically-treated brackish water affects soil water-salt distribution and the growth of cotton with film mulch drip irrigation in Xinjiang, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    7. Jemal Fito & Stijn W. H. Hulle, 2021. "Wastewater reclamation and reuse potentials in agriculture: towards environmental sustainability," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 2949-2972, March.
    8. Graça, Manjate, 2018. "Scope effects in contingent valuation: an application to the valuation of irrigation water quality improvements in Infulene Valley, Mozambique," Research Theses 334752, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    9. Fayezizadeh, Mohammad Reza & Ansari, Naser Alam Zadeh & Albaji, Mohammad & Khaleghi, Esmail, 2021. "Effects of hydroponic systems on yield, water productivity and stomatal gas exchange of greenhouse tomato cultivars," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    10. Manzoor Qadir, 2018. "Policy Note: "Addressing Trade-offs to Promote Safely Managed Wastewater in Developing Countries"," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(02), pages 1-10, April.
    11. Jeong, Hanseok & Bhattarai, Rabin & Adamowski, Jan & Yu, David J., 2020. "Insights from socio-hydrological modeling to design sustainable wastewater reuse strategies for agriculture at the watershed scale," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    12. Ami Reznik & Ariel Dinar, 2022. "Local conditions and the economic feasibility of urban wastewater recycling in irrigated agriculture: Lessons from a stochastic regional analysis in California," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 2115-2130, December.
    13. Alcaide Zaragoza, Carmen & Fernández García, Irene & Martín García, Isabel & Camacho Poyato, Emilio & Rodríguez Díaz, Juan Antonio, 2022. "Spatio-temporal analysis of nitrogen variations in an irrigation distribution network using reclaimed water for irrigating olive trees," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    14. Ricart, Sandra & Rico, Antonio M., 2019. "Assessing technical and social driving factors of water reuse in agriculture: A review on risks, regulation and the yuck factor," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 426-439.
    15. Lévesque, Serge & Graham, Thomas & Bejan, Dorin & Dixon, Mike, 2022. "Comparative analysis of regenerative in situ electrochemical hypochlorination and conventional water disinfection technologies for growing ornamental crops with recirculating hydroponics," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    16. José Luis Cárdenas-Talero & Jorge Antonio Silva-Leal & Andrea Pérez-Vidal & Patricia Torres-Lozada, 2022. "The Influence of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Technologies on the Biological Stabilization of Sewage Sludge: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    17. Orlando Durán & Paulo Andrés Durán, 2018. "Activity Based Costing for Wastewater Treatment and Reuse under Uncertainty: A Fuzzy Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, June.
    18. U., Surendran & O., Sandeep & E.J., Joseph, 2016. "The impacts of magnetic treatment of irrigation water on plant, water and soil characteristics," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 21-29.
    19. Stacy Slobodiuk & Caitlin Niven & Greer Arthur & Siddhartha Thakur & Ayse Ercumen, 2021. "Does Irrigation with Treated and Untreated Wastewater Increase Antimicrobial Resistance in Soil and Water: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-19, October.
    20. Never, Babette, 2016. "Wastewater systems and energy saving in urban India: governing the Water-Energy-Food Nexus series," IDOS Discussion Papers 12/2016, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:6:p:819-:d:833546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.