IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i12p1276-d703272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancement of Interplanting of Ficus carica L. with Taxus cuspidata Sieb. et Zucc. on Growth of Two Plants

Author

Listed:
  • Xue Yang

    (Key Laboratory of Forest Plant Ecology, Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
    College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Resource Utilization, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
    Engineering Research Center of Forest Bio-Preparation, Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
    Collaborative Innovation Center for Development and Utilization of Forest Resources, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Yuzheng Li

    (Key Laboratory of Forest Plant Ecology, Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
    Engineering Research Center of Forest Bio-Preparation, Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Chunying Li

    (Key Laboratory of Forest Plant Ecology, Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
    College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Resource Utilization, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
    Engineering Research Center of Forest Bio-Preparation, Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
    Collaborative Innovation Center for Development and Utilization of Forest Resources, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Qianqian Li

    (Key Laboratory of Forest Plant Ecology, Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
    College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Resource Utilization, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
    Engineering Research Center of Forest Bio-Preparation, Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
    Collaborative Innovation Center for Development and Utilization of Forest Resources, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Bin Qiao

    (Key Laboratory of Forest Plant Ecology, Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
    College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Resource Utilization, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
    Engineering Research Center of Forest Bio-Preparation, Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
    Collaborative Innovation Center for Development and Utilization of Forest Resources, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Sen Shi

    (Key Laboratory of Forest Plant Ecology, Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
    College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Resource Utilization, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
    Engineering Research Center of Forest Bio-Preparation, Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
    Collaborative Innovation Center for Development and Utilization of Forest Resources, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Chunjian Zhao

    (Key Laboratory of Forest Plant Ecology, Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
    College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Resource Utilization, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
    Engineering Research Center of Forest Bio-Preparation, Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
    Collaborative Innovation Center for Development and Utilization of Forest Resources, Harbin 150040, China)

Abstract

Medicinal-agroforestry systems are one of the multi-functional medicinal plant production systems, gaining attention as a sustainable alternative to traditional monoculture systems. In this study, three planting patterns were established which included: (1) monoculture F. carica (MF); (2) monoculture T. cuspidata (MT); and (3) interplanting F. carica with T. cuspidata (IFT). The differences of growth biomass, photosynthesis, soil nutrients, soil enzyme activities, soil microorganisms, and main secondary metabolites of F. carica and T. cuspidata under the above three models were investigated. Compared with the MF and MT patterns, IFT pattern for 5 months significantly increased the plant growth biomass, photosynthesis, soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, and secondary metabolites content. The activities of acid phosphatase, sucrase, protease, polyphenol oxidase, urease, dehydrogenase, and catalase in soil of IFT were significantly higher than MF and MT patterns. Results showed that IFT pattern is preferred compared to the MF and MT patterns. Our result will help to provide a feasible theoretical basis for the large-scale establishment of F. carica and T. cuspidata mixed forests and obtain high-quality medicine sources for extracting important active ingredients, psoralen and paclitaxel, which are crucial to the long-term sustainable development and production of medicinal plants.

Suggested Citation

  • Xue Yang & Yuzheng Li & Chunying Li & Qianqian Li & Bin Qiao & Sen Shi & Chunjian Zhao, 2021. "Enhancement of Interplanting of Ficus carica L. with Taxus cuspidata Sieb. et Zucc. on Growth of Two Plants," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:12:p:1276-:d:703272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/12/1276/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/12/1276/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maya Sollen-Norrlin & Bhim Bahadur Ghaley & Naomi Laura Jane Rintoul, 2020. "Agroforestry Benefits and Challenges for Adoption in Europe and Beyond," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Cezary A. Kwiatkowski & Elżbieta Harasim & Beata Feledyn-Szewczyk & Jacek Antonkiewicz, 2020. "Enzymatic Activity of Loess Soil in Organic and Conventional Farming Systems," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Jiang, Fei & Drohan, Patrick J. & Cibin, Raj & Preisendanz, Heather E. & White, Charles M. & Veith, Tamie L., 2021. "Reallocating crop rotation patterns improves water quality and maintains crop yield," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mario Licata & Antonella Maria Maggio & Salvatore La Bella & Teresa Tuttolomondo, 2022. "Medicinal and Aromatic Plants in Agricultural Research, When Considering Criteria of Multifunctionality and Sustainability," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-4, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eini, Mohammad Reza & Salmani, Haniyeh & Piniewski, Mikołaj, 2023. "Comparison of process-based and statistical approaches for simulation and projections of rainfed crop yields," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    2. Massamba Diop & Ngonidzashe Chirinda & Adnane Beniaich & Mohamed El Gharous & Khalil El Mejahed, 2022. "Soil and Water Conservation in Africa: State of Play and Potential Role in Tackling Soil Degradation and Building Soil Health in Agricultural Lands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-29, October.
    3. Biarnès, Anne & Bailly, Jean-Stéphane & Mekki, Insaf & Ferchichi, Intissar, 2021. "Land use mosaics in Mediterranean rainfed agricultural areas as an indicator of collective crop successions: Insights from a land use time series study conducted in Cap Bon, Tunisia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    4. Noeldeke, Beatrice & Winter, Etti & Ntawuhiganayo, Elisée Bahati, 2022. "Representing human decision-making in agent-based simulation models: Agroforestry adoption in rural Rwanda," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    5. De Lapparent, Alice & Sabatier, Rodolphe & Paut, Raphaël & Martin, Sophie, 2023. "Perennial transitions from market gardening towards mixed fruit tree - vegetable systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    6. Khalid Hussain & Ayesha Ilyas & Irshad Bibi & Thomas Hilger, 2021. "Sustainable Soil Loss Management in Tropical Uplands: Impact on Maize-Chili Cropping Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, June.
    7. Weizhe Weng & Kelly M. Cobourn & Armen R. Kemanian & Kevin J. Boyle & Yuning Shi & Jemma Stachelek & Charles White, 2024. "Quantifying co‐benefits of water quality policies: An integrated assessment model of land and nitrogen management," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(2), pages 547-572, March.
    8. Lelde Timma & Elina Dace & Troels Kristensen & Marie Trydeman Knudsen, 2020. "Dynamic Sustainability Assessment Tool: Case Study of Green Biorefineries in Danish Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    9. Shangyi Lou & Jin He & Hongwen Li & Qingjie Wang & Caiyun Lu & Wenzheng Liu & Peng Liu & Zhenguo Zhang & Hui Li, 2021. "Current Knowledge and Future Directions for Improving Subsoiling Quality and Reducing Energy Consumption in Conservation Fields," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, June.
    10. Marioara Nicoleta Filimon & Diana Larisa Roman & Ion Valeriu Caraba & Adriana Isvoran, 2021. "Assessment of the Effect of Application of the Herbicide S-Metolachlor on the Activity of Some Enzymes Found in Soil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, May.
    11. Eleni Topalidou & Alexandra D. Solomou & Susana S. Santos & Evdokia Krystallidou & Styliani Kakara & Konstantinos Mantzanas, 2021. "Dynamic Role and Importance of Multi-Kingdom Communities in Mediterranean Wood-Pastures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    12. Mudrite Daugaviete & Kristaps Makovskis & Andis Lazdins & Dagnija Lazdina, 2022. "Suitability of Fast-Growing Tree Species ( Salix spp., Populus spp., Alnus spp.) for the Establishment of Economic Agroforestry Zones for Biomass Energy in the Baltic Sea Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-11, December.
    13. Meine van Noordwijk, 2021. "Agroforestry-Based Ecosystem Services: Reconciling Values of Humans and Nature in Sustainable Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    14. Nontobeko Gloria Maphuhla & Francis Bayo Lewu & Opeoluwa Oyehan Oyedeji, 2020. "The Effects of Physicochemical Parameters on Analysed Soil Enzyme Activity from Alice Landfill Site," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-15, December.
    15. Femeena, P.V. & Costello, C. & Brennan, R.A., 2023. "Spatial optimization of nutrient recovery from dairy farms to support economically viable load reductions in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    16. Lin Wang & Mandeep Kaur & Ping Zhang & Ji Li & Ming Xu, 2021. "Effect of Different Agricultural Farming Practices on Microbial Biomass and Enzyme Activities of Celery Growing Field Soil," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Wen Lv & Xining Zhao & Pute Wu & Jialong Lv & Hailong He, 2021. "A Scientometric Analysis of Worldwide Intercropping Research Based on Web of Science Database between 1992 and 2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, February.
    18. Sylwia Wesołowska & Barbara Futa & Magdalena Myszura & Agata Kobyłka, 2022. "Residual Effects of Different Cropping Systems on Physicochemical Properties and the Activity of Phosphatases of Soil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, May.
    19. Marioara Nicoleta Caraba & Diana Larisa Roman & Ion Valeriu Caraba & Adriana Isvoran, 2023. "Assessment of the Effects of the Herbicide Aclonifen and Its Soil Metabolites on Soil and Aquatic Environments," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, June.
    20. Andis Bārdulis & Jānis Ivanovs & Arta Bārdule & Dagnija Lazdiņa & Dana Purviņa & Aldis Butlers & Andis Lazdiņš, 2022. "Assessment of Agricultural Areas Suitable for Agroforestry in Latvia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:12:p:1276-:d:703272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.