IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v14y2024i2p32-d1339552.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation’s Performance: A Transnational Analysis Based on the Global Innovation Index

Author

Listed:
  • Evelina Maria Oliveira Coutinho

    (Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering and Tourism, Campus Universitário de Santiago, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
    Research Unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies, Campus Universitário de Santiago, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Manuel Au-Yong-Oliveira

    (Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering and Tourism, Campus Universitário de Santiago, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
    Research Unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies, Campus Universitário de Santiago, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
    INESC TEC—Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

The pandemic marked the beginning of a succession of events on a global scale (not the least of which is a greater concern for the environment and for quality of life/distance work) with a major impact on the economy. Innovation plays a key role in meeting the challenges of the future, but despite investment in innovation, global economic growth has fallen short of the expected performance. The aim of this study is to identify the factors with the greatest impact on the performance of innovation ecosystems based on the performance of the innovation ecosystems of 64 countries assessed by the Global Innovation Index 2022. The methodology consists of multiple hierarchical linear regressions, in which the impact factors on innovation ecosystems, measured through indicators, are the independent variables and innovation performance, in knowledge and technology and in creativity, are the dependent variables in an iterative process, using STATA/MP 18.0 data analysis software. The results indicate that human capital and research (the basis of business and innovative products aimed at filling gaps in the market are people with a good higher education, which is also linked to local university rankings) and business sophistication (highly qualified work, leveraging strategic partnerships, and with knowledge absorption capacity) are the main pillars determining innovation performance at a global level. Education (an educated workforce is of growing importance in the knowledge era), R&D investment (including support from the state in the form of tax incentives for whoever invests in R&D), innovation partnerships (for a faster, more open innovation effort), ecological sustainability (a new reinforced priority after COVID-19) and knowledge absorption (to absorb one must first detain valuable knowledge in the area) are the variables with the greatest impact on innovation performance. The work provides guidance on which areas should be prioritized in the development of policies and strategies to accelerate innovation in countries. The study is limited by the time frame and reveals, by comparison with pre-pandemic studies, that the determinants of innovation can be dynamic, varying according to the countries and, consequently, the global context of the analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Evelina Maria Oliveira Coutinho & Manuel Au-Yong-Oliveira, 2024. "Innovation’s Performance: A Transnational Analysis Based on the Global Innovation Index," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:32-:d:1339552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/2/32/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/2/32/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Silva, Muthu & Howells, Jeremy & Meyer, Martin, 2018. "Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge–based practices and internal value creation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 70-87.
    2. Qing’e Wang & Luwei Zhao & Alice Chang-Richards & Yuanyuan Zhang & Hujun Li, 2021. "Understanding the Impact of Social Capital on the Innovation Performance of Construction Enterprises: Based on the Mediating Effect of Knowledge Transfer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Wang, Chengqi & Kafouros, Mario & Yi, Jingtao & Hong, Junjie & Ganotakis, Panagiotis, 2020. "The role of government affiliation in explaining firm innovativeness and profitability in emerging countries: Evidence from China," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(3).
    4. Yi-Xun Pang & Sin-Huei Ng & Wei-Theng Lau, 2022. "Digital Cashless Payments and Economic Growth: Evidence from CPMI Countries," Capital Markets Review, Malaysian Finance Association, vol. 30(2), pages 63-89.
    5. Maha Mohamed Alsebai Mohamed & Pingfeng Liu & Guihua Nie, 2022. "Do Knowledge Economy Indicators Affect Economic Growth? Evidence from Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-37, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caloffi, Annalisa & Colovic, Ana & Rizzoli, Valentina & Rossi, Federica, 2023. "Innovation intermediaries' types and functions: A computational analysis of the literature," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Anna Maria Lis & Marita McPhillips & Adrian Lis, 2020. "Sustainability of Cluster Organizations as Open Innovation Intermediaries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Waseem Ul Hameed & Muhammad Farhan Basheer & Jawad Iqbal & Ayesha Anwar & Hafiz Khalil Ahmad, 2018. "Determinants of Firm’s open innovation performance and the role of R & D department: an empirical evidence from Malaysian SME’s," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Conroy, Kieran M. & Jacobs, Simon & Liu, Yang, 2023. "The dual knowledge role of open innovation intermediaries: Internal weaving and external filtering for MNE subsidiaries," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    5. Bhattacharjya, Bibhuti Ranjan & Bhaduri, Saradindu & Kakoty, Sashindra Kumar, 2023. "Co-creating community-led frugal innovation: An adapted Quadruple Helix?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    6. Zhou, Junbi & Wang, Mingyue, 2023. "The role of government-industry-academia partnership in business incubation: Evidence from new R&D institutions in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    7. Jinsu Kim & Hyunchul Lee, 2023. "How Does Corporate Innovation Affect Sustainable Business Investment?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-14, September.
    8. Abrar Chaudhury, 2020. "Role of Intermediaries in Shaping Climate Finance in Developing Countries—Lessons from the Green Climate Fund," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-17, July.
    9. César Melara-Gálvez & Emilio J. Morales-Fernández, 2022. "A Comparative Analysis of the Competitiveness of Central American Countries Based on the Global Competitiveness Index before the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    10. Călin Florin Băban & Marius Băban, 2022. "An Orchestration Perspective on Open Innovation between Industry–University: Investigating Its Impact on Collaboration Performance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-23, July.
    11. Williams, Christopher & van Triest, Sander, 2023. "Understanding performance in professional services for innovation intermediation: Technology consultants vs. management consultants," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    12. Zhe Ouyang & Qian Sun & Yang Liu, 2024. "The impact of investor reaction to crisis events on corporate philanthropy: evidence from Chinese firms," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 139-163, February.
    13. De Silva, Muthu & Howells, Jeremy & Khan, Zaheer & Meyer, Martin, 2022. "Innovation ambidexterity and public innovation Intermediaries: The mediating role of capabilities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 14-29.
    14. Cristina Prieto & Sonia Fereres & Luisa F. Cabeza, 2020. "The Role of Innovation in Industry Product Deployment: Developing Thermal Energy Storage for Concentrated Solar Power," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    15. Laura Kreiling & Ahmed Bounfour, 2020. "A practice-based maturity model for holistic TTO performance management: development and initial use," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 1718-1747, December.
    16. Leckel, Anja & Veilleux, Sophie & Dana, Leo Paul, 2020. "Local Open Innovation: A means for public policy to increase collaboration for innovation in SMEs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    17. Kathleen Diener & Dirk Luettgens & Frank Thomas Piller, 2019. "Intermediation For Open Innovation: Comparing Direct Versus Delegated Search Strategies Of Innovation Intermediaries," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(04), pages 1-20, June.
    18. Pu, Xiaohong & Zeng, Ming & Zhang, Weike, 2023. "Corporate sustainable development driven by high-quality innovation: Does fiscal decentralization really matter?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 273-289.
    19. Albino-Pimentel, João & Dussauge, Pierre & El Nayal, Omar, 2022. "Intellectual property rights, non-market considerations and foreign R&D investments," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(2).
    20. Kafouros, Mario & Cavusgil, S. Tamer & Devinney, Timothy M. & Ganotakis, Panagiotis & Fainshmidt, Stav, 2022. "Cycles of de-internationalization and re-internationalization: Towards an integrative framework," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(1).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:32-:d:1339552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.