IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v11y2021i4p134-d677585.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodology for Designing Humanitarian Supply Chains: Distribution of COVID-19 Vaccines in Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • Eva Selene Hernández Gress

    (School of Engineering and Science, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey 38115, Mexico)

  • Neil Hernández-Gress

    (School of Engineering and Science, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey 38115, Mexico)

  • Karen Sujo Contla

    (School of Engineering and Science, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey 38115, Mexico)

Abstract

This paper presents a methodology for designing a humanitarian supply chain (HSC) for immunization in Mexico. The study analyzes the abilities of HSCs provided in the literature and those that are relevant for the HSC vaccination in Mexico. In addition, the stakeholders involved in HSC for immunization were studied. A sentiment analysis of more than 900 newspaper articles was conducted to determine society’s perception of the government’s strategy for vaccine distribution. Considering these aspects and a review of the state-of-the-art in the design of supply chains, a methodology for HSC is proposed. Some of the findings are that resilience and agility, the most important abilities in HSCs in Mexico, can be achieved through government support and strong collaboration between different stakeholders, which was found to be the weakest point of the strategy. The problems observed in the vaccination strategy in Mexico were as follows: (1) a single physical space per municipality was defined for the application of the vaccine, (2) there is a shortage of vaccines, and (3) as far as we know, no methodology has been applied to carry out immunization. This approach considers the design of HSCs in terms of capabilities and stakeholders, which, to the best of our knowledge, is a novel aspect of the literature. This methodology can be used for various scenarios of HSCs in Mexico.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva Selene Hernández Gress & Neil Hernández-Gress & Karen Sujo Contla, 2021. "Methodology for Designing Humanitarian Supply Chains: Distribution of COVID-19 Vaccines in Mexico," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:134-:d:677585
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/11/4/134/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/11/4/134/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fatemeh Sabouhi & Mohammad Saeed Jabalameli & Armin Jabbarzadeh & Behnam Fahimnia, 2020. "A multi-cut L-shaped method for resilient and responsive supply chain network design," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(24), pages 7353-7381, December.
    2. Atanu Sengupta & Sanjoy De, 2020. "Review of Literature," India Studies in Business and Economics, in: Assessing Performance of Banks in India Fifty Years After Nationalization, chapter 0, pages 15-30, Springer.
    3. L N Van Wassenhove, 2006. "Humanitarian aid logistics: supply chain management in high gear," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(5), pages 475-489, May.
    4. Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2010. "Dynamic relief-demand management for emergency logistics operations under large-scale disasters," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Abhishek Behl & Pankaj Dutta, 2019. "Humanitarian supply chain management: a thematic literature review and future directions of research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1001-1044, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lydia Novoszel & Tina Wakolbinger, 2022. "Meta-analysis of Supply Chain Disruption Research," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Samuel Fosso Wamba, 2022. "Humanitarian supply chain: a bibliometric analysis and future research directions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 937-963, December.
    3. Li Zhu & Yeming Gong & Yishui Xu & Jun Gu, 2019. "Emergency relief routing models for injured victims considering equity and priority," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1573-1606, December.
    4. Lijo John & Anand Gurumurthy & Arqum Mateen & Gopalakrishnan Narayanamurthy, 2022. "Improving the coordination in the humanitarian supply chain: exploring the role of options contract," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 15-40, December.
    5. Chen, Li-Ming & Liu, Yan Emma & Yang, Shu-Jung Sunny, 2015. "Robust supply chain strategies for recovering from unanticipated disasters," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 198-214.
    6. Fahimnia, Behnam & Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Ghavamifar, Ali & Bell, Michael, 2017. "Supply chain design for efficient and effective blood supply in disasters," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PC), pages 700-709.
    7. Devendra K. Yadav & Akhilesh Barve, 2016. "Modeling Post-disaster Challenges of Humanitarian Supply Chains: A TISM Approach," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 17(3), pages 321-340, September.
    8. Xuehong Gao, 2022. "A bi-level stochastic optimization model for multi-commodity rebalancing under uncertainty in disaster response," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 115-148, December.
    9. M. Ali Ülkü & James H. Bookbinder & Nam Yi Yun, 2024. "Leveraging Industry 4.0 Technologies for Sustainable Humanitarian Supply Chains: Evidence from the Extant Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-26, February.
    10. A. Anaya-Arenas & J. Renaud & A. Ruiz, 2014. "Relief distribution networks: a systematic review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 223(1), pages 53-79, December.
    11. Li Zhu & Yeming Gong & Yishui Xu & Jun Gu, 2019. "Emergency Relief Routing Models for Injured Victims Considering Equity and Priority," Post-Print hal-02879681, HAL.
    12. Prima Denny Sentia & Syaimak Abdul Shukor & Amelia Natasya Abdul Wahab & Muriati Mukhtar, 2023. "Logistic distribution in humanitarian supply chain management: a thematic literature review and future research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 323(1), pages 175-201, April.
    13. Li, Xiaoping & Batta, Rajan & Kwon, Changhyun, 2017. "Effective and equitable supply of gasoline to impacted areas in the aftermath of a natural disaster," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 25-34.
    14. Falasca, Mauro & Zobel, Christopher, 2012. "An optimization model for volunteer assignments in humanitarian organizations," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 250-260.
    15. Sarah Schiffling & Claire Hannibal & Matthew Tickle & Yiyi Fan, 2022. "The implications of complexity for humanitarian logistics: a complex adaptive systems perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1379-1410, December.
    16. Josip Marić & Carlos Galera-Zarco & Marco Opazo-Basáez, 2022. "The emergent role of digital technologies in the context of humanitarian supply chains: a systematic literature review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1003-1044, December.
    17. Nagurney, Anna & Flores, Emilio Alvarez & Soylu, Ceren, 2016. "A Generalized Nash Equilibrium network model for post-disaster humanitarian relief," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 1-18.
    18. Yanbin Chang & Yongjia Song & Burak Eksioglu, 2022. "A stochastic look-ahead approach for hurricane relief logistics operations planning under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1231-1263, December.
    19. Alptekin Ulutaş & Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene & Ayse Topal & Ezgi Demir, 2021. "Assessment of Collaboration-Based and Non-Collaboration-Based Logistics Risks with Plithogenic SWARA Method," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-14, November.
    20. Altay, Nezih & Narayanan, Arunachalam, 2022. "Forecasting in humanitarian operations: Literature review and research needs," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1234-1244.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:134-:d:677585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.