IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejssjr/101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health Returns to Birth Weight: Evidence from Developing Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Vaibhav Keshav

    (Department of Social Work, Faculty of Social Studies, University of Ostrava, the Czech Republic)

Abstract

This paper explores the effect of birth weight on a series of anthropometric outcomes among children. We use a panel of individual-level data from 39 developing countries covering the years 1999-2018 and attempt to solve the Endogeneity using mother fixed effect and twin fixed-effect strategies. The results suggest that improvements in birth weight result in statistically and economically significant improvements in children's anthropometric outcomes. An additional 100 grams birth weight is associated with a 0.43 and 0.25 units increase in weight for age percentile and height for age percentile, respectively. The links are stronger among low educated mothers and poorer households. The observed protective effect of birth weight on infant mortality suggests that the true effects of birth weight on children’s outcomes are larger and that the estimated effects probably understate the true effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Vaibhav Keshav, 2021. "Health Returns to Birth Weight: Evidence from Developing Countries," European Journal of Social Sciences Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 4, July -Dec.
    • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejssjr:101
    DOI: 10.26417/422jjq54x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.org/index.php/ejss/article/view/5257
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://revistia.org/files/articles/ejss_v4_i2_21/Keshav.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/422jjq54x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. José van Dijck & Thomas Poell, 2013. "Understanding Social Media Logic," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(1), pages 2-14.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariek Vanden Abeele & Ralf De Wolf & Rich Ling, 2018. "Mobile Media and Social Space: How Anytime, Anyplace Connectivity Structures Everyday Life," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 5-14.
    2. Luis-Millán González & José Devís-Devís & Maite Pellicer-Chenoll & Miquel Pans & Alberto Pardo-Ibañez & Xavier García-Massó & Fernanda Peset & Fernanda Garzón-Farinós & Víctor Pérez-Samaniego, 2021. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Sport in Twitter: A Quantitative and Qualitative Content Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Estela Marine-Roig & Eva Martin-Fuentes & Natalia Daries-Ramon, 2017. "User-Generated Social Media Events in Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Martin Echeverría, 2023. "Experiencing Political Advertising Through Social Media Logic: A Qualitative Inquiry," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(2), pages 127-136.
    5. Celina Navarro & Gemma Gómez-Bernal, 2022. "The Use of Social Media by Spanish Feminist Organizations: Collectivity From Individualism," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 93-103.
    6. Dolata, Ulrich, 2017. "Social movements and the Internet: The sociotechnical constitution of collective action," Research Contributions to Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies, SOI Discussion Papers 2017-02, University of Stuttgart, Institute for Social Sciences, Department of Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies.
    7. Kenneth L. Hacker & Vanessa R. Mendez, 2016. "Toward a Model of Strategic Influence, International Broadcasting, and Global Engagement," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(2), pages 69-91.
    8. Jacob Groshek & Sarah Krongard, 2016. "Netflix and Engage? Implications for Streaming Television on Political Participation during the 2016 US Presidential Campaign," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-18, October.
    9. Jansson, André, 2018. "Rethinking post-tourism in the age of social media," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 101-110.
    10. Rukhsana Aslam, 2016. "Building Peace through Journalism in the Social/Alternate Media," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(1), pages 63-79.
    11. Kaisu Koivumäki & Timo Koivumäki & Erkki Karvonen, 2020. "“On Social Media Science Seems to Be More Human”: Exploring Researchers as Digital Science Communicators," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 425-439.
    12. Daniele Battista, 2023. "Winning against All Odds: Elly Schlein’s Successful Election Campaign and Instagram Communication Strategies," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-13, May.
    13. Rodrigo Quintas da Silva, 2018. "A Portuguese exception to right-wing populism," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-5, December.
    14. Francois Schalkwyk & Jonathan Dudek & Rodrigo Costas, 2020. "Communities of shared interests and cognitive bridges: the case of the anti-vaccination movement on Twitter," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(2), pages 1499-1516, November.
    15. Sofia P. Caldeira, 2021. "“It’s Not Just Instagram Models”: Exploring the Gendered Political Potential of Young Women’s Instagram Use," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 5-15.
    16. Reimer, Thomas, 2023. "Environmental factors to maximize social media engagement: A comprehensive framework," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    17. Miriam Steiner, 2020. "Soft Presentation of Hard News? A Content Analysis of Political Facebook Posts," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 244-257.
    18. André Jansson, 2015. "Interveillance: A New Culture of Recognition and Mediatization," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(3), pages 81-90.
    19. Kelly, Dr Gráinne & McAdam, Maura, 2022. "Scaffolding liminality: The lived experience of women entrepreneurs in digital spaces," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    20. Maria Schreiber, 2017. "Showing/Sharing: Analysing Visual Communication from a Praxeological Perspective," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 37-50.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejssjr:101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.org/index.php/ejss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.