The Quality of Aid Statistics What We Should Be Measuring, and Why We Don’t
Measuring the size of international development aid is no easy matter. All sorts of definitional and statistical issues arise, and there are inevitably grey areas surrounding a concept that is so politically and normatively charged. This paper proposes a coherent framework for alternative aid measures. Against this background the statistics on aid published annually by the OECD are being assessed. The analysis focuses on three categories of aid: technical assistance, soft loans and debt relief. It is argued that lack of rigour and consistency considerably weaken the relevance of aid statistics for policy makers and researchers.
Volume (Year): XLVIII (2003)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.econ.kuleuven.be
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ete:revbec:20030406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Hilde Roos)The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Hilde Roos to update the entry or send us the correct address
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.