IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

El Proceso de Bolonia en el Derecho Público Español. Autonomía universitaria, distribución de competencias y empleo público

Listed author(s):
  • Fernández Alles, José Joaquín
Registered author(s):

    The acquits of inter-governmental agreements, being signed by forty-six States in the Bologna Process context, as a starting point promoted by the European Union States, regions and universities to promote an area for academic integration (European Higher Education Area), is applied to three aspects which need to be identified in order to a better understanding of their benefits and to resolve their most problematic aspects. These three areas are: (a) The constitutional dimension, which is of particular significance in the following subjects: the constitutional rights, the institutional guarantee of university autonomy and the distribution of powers between the State, the Autonomous Communities and the Universities, (b) The supranational level, with a certification system based on the recognition of qualifications, and (c) The public employment and academic careers of university professors. Moreover, this triple definition must be compatible with the legal characterization of the university as a public service.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Entelequia y Grupo (Universidad de Málaga) in its journal Entelequia. Revista Interdisciplinar.

    Volume (Year): (2009)
    Issue (Month): 10 (Fall)
    Pages: 1-19

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:erv:ancoec:y:2009:i:10:p:1-19
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erv:ancoec:y:2009:i:10:p:1-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Lisette Villamizar)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.