IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiiy2025i3p500-517.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technical Knowledge as a Determinant of ESG Implementation in the Electric Power and Transport Sectors

Author

Listed:
  • Wojciechowski Jerzy
  • Ferensztajn-Galardos Ewa
  • Krajewska Renata

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the role of technical knowledge in the implementation of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) strategies within the electric power and transport sectors—two industries critical to sustainable development and subject to increasing regulatory scrutiny under the European Green Deal. Design/Methodology/Approach: Based on a survey of professionals from both sectors in Poland, the research explores ESG awareness, reporting practices, internal communication, and the involvement of technical personnel in ESG-related activities. Findings: The results reveal a generally low level of ESG awareness and engagement across both sectors. A substantial proportion of respondents were unaware of whether their companies produce ESG reports, and many reported a lack of formalized ESG procedures or access to relevant information. Despite this, most respondents recognize the importance of ESG for corporate reputation and stakeholder trust, indicating a disconnect between perceived value and actual practice. Notably, respondents highlighted limited managerial involvement in ESG initiatives and a lack of systematic practices, such as energy monitoring or carbon footprint analysis. However, there is strong interest in ESG training, particularly among technical staff, suggesting an untapped opportunity for capacity building. The study also identifies a need for improved data standardization and the integration of operational knowledge into ESG reporting processes. Practical implications: Recommendations include mandatory ESG training, the standardization of data collection and reporting, and a stronger role for technical teams in ESG strategy development. Additionally, the paper emphasizes the importance of leadership commitment and enhanced transparency toward both internal and external stakeholders. While ESG implementation remains nascent in the sectors studied, the findings highlight significant potential for progress. Leveraging technical expertise, improving communication, and institutionalizing ESG practices can strengthen organizational sustainability, compliance, and reputation. Originality Value: The study contributes to the limited literature addressing ESG in these sectors and offers practical insights for advancing ESG maturity in industrial contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Wojciechowski Jerzy & Ferensztajn-Galardos Ewa & Krajewska Renata, 2025. "Technical Knowledge as a Determinant of ESG Implementation in the Electric Power and Transport Sectors," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 500-517.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:3:p:500-517
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/4057/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Silvia-Andreea Peliu, 2024. "Exploring the impact of ESG factors on corporate risk: empirical evidence for New York Stock Exchange listed companies," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-34, December.
    2. Renata Krajewska & Ewa Ferensztajn-Galardos & Grazyna Olszewska, 2025. "Modern Logistical Solutions in Polish E-Commerce: Economic Drivers and a Case Study Analysis," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 207-220.
    3. Nicolas, Maxime L.D. & Desroziers, Adrien & Caccioli, Fabio & Aste, Tomaso, 2024. "ESG reputation risk matters: An event study based on social media data," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    4. Pina Murè & Marco Spallone & Fabiomassimo Mango & Stefano Marzioni & Lucilla Bittucci, 2021. "ESG and reputation: The case of sanctioned Italian banks," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 265-277, January.
    5. Marvin Nipper & Andreas Ostermaier & Jochen Theis, 2025. "Mandatory disclosure of standardized sustainability metrics: The case of the EU Taxonomy Regulation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 2171-2190, March.
    6. Jody Grewal & Edward J. Riedl & George Serafeim, 2019. "Market Reaction to Mandatory Nonfinancial Disclosure," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(7), pages 3061-3084, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dharen Kumar Pandey & Waleed M. Al‐ahdal & Hafiza Aishah Hashim, 2024. "Stock market reaction to mandatory sustainability reporting: Does carbon‐intensity and environmental, social, and governance reputation matter?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 9116-9140, December.
    2. Karoline Bax & Giovanni Bonaccolto & Sandra Paterlini, 2023. "Do lower environmental, social, and governance (ESG) rated companies have higher systemic impact? Empirical evidence from Europe and the United States," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1406-1420, May.
    3. Su, Yueying & Li, Jialong & Li, Zhicheng & Wu, Cathy, 2025. "CEO inside debt holdings and climate risk concerns in corporate acquisition," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    4. Bingler, Julia Anna & Kraus, Mathias & Leippold, Markus & Webersinke, Nicolas, 2024. "How cheap talk in climate disclosures relates to climate initiatives, corporate emissions, and reputation risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    5. Wang, Jianli & Wang, Shaolin & Dong, Minghua & Wang, Hongxia, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement and stock returns: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    6. Müller, Raphael & Spengel, Christoph & Weck, Stefan, 2021. "How do investors value the publication of tax information? Evidence from the European public country-by-country reporting," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-077, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    7. Krivogorsky, Victoria, 2024. "Sustainability reporting with two different voices: The European Union and the International Sustainability Standards Board," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    8. María Luisa Pajuelo‐Moreno & María Jesús Barroso‐Méndez & Dolores Gallardo‐Vázquez, 2024. "Relationship between sustainability disclosure and corporate reputation: Evidence from a meta‐analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8593-8615, December.
    9. Khurram, Muhammad Usman & Chen, Lifeng & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul & Adu, Douglas A. & Lucey, Brian, 2024. "ESG disclosure and internal pay gap: Empirical evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 228-244.
    10. Paul Cousins & Marie Dutordoir & Benn Lawson & João Quariguasi Frota Neto, 2020. "Shareholder Wealth Effects of Modern Slavery Regulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(11), pages 5265-5289, November.
    11. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    12. James Zhang, Yibo & Murthy, Uday, 2024. "How graphical vividness and interactivity in non-financial presentations influence nonprofessional investors," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    13. Úbeda, Fernando & Mendez, Alvaro & Forcadell, Francisco Javier, 2022. "The sustainable practices of multinational banks as drivers of financial inclusion in developing countries," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115063, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Dahlström, Petter & Lööf, Hans & Sahamkhadam, Maziar & Stephan, Andreas & Lu, Emma Rui, 2023. "Science-based emission targets and risk-adjusted portfolio return: An analysis using global SBTi-validated stocks," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 492, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    15. Sun, Yanru & Sun, Hao & Sun, Panfei & Jin, Xuanzhu & Yang, Yimei, 2025. "Elevating the corporate social responsibility level: A media supervision mechanism based on the Stackelberg-Evolutionary game model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    16. Basu, Debarati & Sen, Kaustav, 2022. "Organizational form and access to capital: The role of regulatory interventions," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(3).
    17. Liang, Xiao & Chen, Xiaomeng Charlene, 2024. "Mandatory corporate social responsibility disclosure and financial constraints: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PA), pages 954-974.
    18. Wang, Ruizhe & Chua, Wai Fong & Simnett, Roger & Zhou, Shan, 2024. "Is greater connectivity of financial and non-financial information in annual reports valued by market participants?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(6).
    19. Florackis, Chris & Muktadir-Al-Mukit, Dewan & Sainani, Sushil & Zhang, Ziyang (John), 2025. "Stock market reaction to mandatory carbon disclosure announcements: The role of institutional investors," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    20. Wang, Kai & Li, Tingting & San, Ziyao & Gao, Hao, 2023. "How does corporate ESG performance affect stock liquidity? Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q40 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - General
    • L94 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Electric Utilities
    • L91 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Transportation: General
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:3:p:500-517. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.