IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i3-part1p256-281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cooperation between Science, Business, and Administration under the Triple Helix Model in European States: The Example of Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Kinga Ewa Bednarzewska
  • Agnieszka Sitko-Lutek

Abstract

Purpose: The primary goal of the paper is to evaluate the cooperation between representatives of scientific, economic, and administrative sectors in Poland against the background of selected European countries, identify the relevant barriers, and provide recommendations for the improvement thereof. The methodological goal is to develop a research model within the Triple Helix Readiness concept and a diagnostic tool to facilitate the measurement of readiness of the Polish science, business and administration sectors to engage in practical cooperation. Design/Methodology/Approach: To those ends, a triangulation of research methods was employed using diagnostic surveys and computer-assisted self-interviewing (CASI) techniques. The research tool used was an online questionnaire sent out to the relevant stakeholders (17 municipalities, 150 higher education institutions (HEIs), and 340 enterprises). The results were processed using elements of descriptive statistics. A hierarchical cluster analysis based on Ward's method was used to grade the cities and group them in terms of likelihood readiness to engage in cooperation with external entities. Findings: As evidenced by the results, readiness to engage in cooperation with external entities depends on many factors. Economic operators' perspective includes the advancement of IT systems, availability of modern knowledge management tools, research and development activity, ownership or registered and submitted patents, trademarks, and training budgets. On the other hand, universities highlight the possibility of commercializing and marketing their advanced solutions. Originality/Value: The principal added value provided by the paper is its contribution in the form of the scientific model and research tool applicable to the assessment of cooperation readiness of scientific, economic, and administrative entities within the framework of the triple helix approach, as well as recommendations of improvements to the effectiveness of such cooperation. The employed methodology could also be applied in comparative analyses of other European countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Kinga Ewa Bednarzewska & Agnieszka Sitko-Lutek, 2021. "Cooperation between Science, Business, and Administration under the Triple Helix Model in European States: The Example of Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3 - Part ), pages 256-281.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3-part1:p:256-281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2353/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Loet Leydesdorff & Martin Meyer, 2003. "The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 58(2), pages 191-203, October.
    2. Gabriela Dutrénit & Claudia De Fuentes & Arturo Torres, 2010. "Channels of interaction between public research organisations and industry and their benefits: evidence from Mexico," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 37(7), pages 513-526, August.
    3. Ankrah, Samuel & AL-Tabbaa, Omar, 2015. "Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 387-408.
    4. Kinga Bednarzewska, 2016. "University-Business-Government the Triple Helix Model of Innovation," Managing Innovation and Diversity in Knowledge Society Through Turbulent Time: Proceedings of the MakeLearn and TIIM Joint International Conference 2016,, ToKnowPress.
    5. Klofsten, Magnus & Jones-Evans, Dylan, 2000. "Comparing Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe--The Case of Sweden and Ireland," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 299-309, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3:p:256-281 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Paolo Carioli & Dirk Czarnitzki & Christian Rammer, 2024. "Industry-Science-Interaction in Innovation: The Role of Transfer Channels and Policy Support," Working Papers of Department of Management, Strategy and Innovation, Leuven 751257, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Management, Strategy and Innovation, Leuven.
    3. Tolulope Paul Akinbobola & Oluwole Matthew Akinnagbe, 2023. "Determinants of linkages between agricultural institutions and agro-allied industries in Southwest, Nigeria," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 228-248, January.
    4. Meng, Donghui & Li, Xianjun & Rong, Ke, 2019. "Industry-to-university knowledge transfer in ecosystem-based academic entrepreneurship: Case study of automotive dynamics & control group in Tsinghua University," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 249-262.
    5. Jun-You Lin & Chih-Hai Yang, 2020. "Heterogeneity in industry–university R&D collaboration and firm innovative performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(1), pages 1-25, July.
    6. Victoria Galan-Muros & Todd Davey, 2019. "The UBC ecosystem: putting together a comprehensive framework for university-business cooperation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 1311-1346, August.
    7. Flores, Maria Cecilia & Grimaldi, Rosa & Poli, Silvia & Villani, Elisa, 2024. "Entrepreneurial universities and intrapreneurship: A process model on the emergence of an intrapreneurial university," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    8. Jyoti Paswan & Vivek Kumar Singh & Mousumi Karmakar & Prashasti Singh, 2022. "Does university–industry–government collaboration in research gets higher citation and altmetric impact? A case study from India," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(11), pages 6063-6082, November.
    9. Compagnucci, Lorenzo & Spigarelli, Francesca, 2020. "The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    10. Marius Băban & Călin Florin Băban & Tudor Mitran, 2023. "Universities as an External Knowledge Source for Industry: Investigating the Antecedents’ Impact on the Importance Perception of Their Collaboration in Open Innovation Using an Ordinal Regression-Neur," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, March.
    11. Junfu Zhang, 2006. "A Study of Academic Entrepreneurs Using Venture Capital Data," PPIC Working Papers 2006.01, Public Policy Institute of California.
    12. Gesa Pflitsch & Verena Radinger-Peer, 2018. "Developing Boundary-Spanning Capacity for Regional Sustainability Transitions—A Comparative Case Study of the Universities of Augsburg (Germany) and Linz (Austria)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-26, March.
    13. Tomas Karlsson & Caroline Wigren, 2012. "Start-ups among university employees: the influence of legitimacy, human capital and social capital," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 297-312, June.
    14. Federica Rossi & Ainurul Rosli, 2013. "Indicators of university-industry knowledge transfer performance and their implications for universities: Evidence from the UK’s HE-BCI survey," Working Papers 13, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Aug 2013.
    15. Ding, Waverly & Choi, Emily, 2008. "Divergent Paths or Stepping Stones: A Comparison of Scientists’ Advising and Founding Activities," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt4907j25p, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    16. Nicolas Carayol & Elodie Carpentier, 2022. "The spread of academic invention: a nationwide case study on French data (1995–2012)," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 1395-1421, October.
    17. Simeone, Luca & Secundo, Giustina & Schiuma, Giovanni, 2017. "Adopting a design approach to translate needs and interests of stakeholders in academic entrepreneurship: The MIT Senseable City Lab case," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 64, pages 58-67.
    18. Rippa, Pierluigi & Secundo, Giustina, 2019. "Digital academic entrepreneurship: The potential of digital technologies on academic entrepreneurship," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 900-911.
    19. Abderrezzak Benhabib & Amina Merabet & Mohamed Benachenhou & Yamina Grari & Fouzi Boudia & Hadjira Merabet, 2014. "Environmental and Individual Determinants of Female Entrepreneurship in Algeria: Applying the Structural Equation Modeling," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 2(1), pages 65-80.
    20. Subhan Tahrima & Don Jaegal, 2013. "Applicability of Knowledge-Based Innovation System in Bangladesh," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 185-208, December.
    21. Jiang, Renai & Jefferson, Gary H. & Zucker, Sam & Li, Lintong, 2019. "The role of research and ownership collaboration in generating patent quality: China-U.S comparisons," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3-part1:p:256-281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.