IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eph/journl/v9y2014i2n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate social responsibility versus corporate social iresponsibility

Author

Listed:
  • Mirela Popa

    (Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Irina Salanță

    (Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been an intensively researched topic in the last decades. More and more scientists manifested interest in this concept and elaborated various definitions. Gradually, CSR evolved from a theoretical concept to a complex managerial tool used to build a company’s reputation and enlarge its competitive advantage. It was soon a must have for more and more companies. Although only large corporations used it at first, today CSR is part of the business strategy of many small and medium size companies also. The more popular it became, the more it grew in complexity and the idea of corporate social irresponsibility arose. Corporate social irresponsibility (CSI) refers to the dark side, as it investigates the wrongful and damaging business decisions that managers might take. In this article we provide a viewpoint on the conceptualization of the two topics and the distinction between them. Through an evaluation of the academic literature, we provide an explanatory view of corporate social responsibility and corporate social irresponsibility emphasizing their most popular definitions, historical development and relevance for companies. The opinions expressed in the article can be useful for both academia and managers as we give suggestions on finding ways to reduce CSI and enhance CSR.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirela Popa & Irina Salanță, 2014. "Corporate social responsibility versus corporate social iresponsibility," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 9(2), Summer.
  • Handle: RePEc:eph:journl:v:9:y:2014:i:2:n:4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.managementmarketing.ro/pdf/articole/446.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Coleman Joshua T. & Peasley Michael C., 2015. "Demonstrating a lack of brand/cause effects on point of sale donations," Management & Marketing, De Gruyter Open, vol. 10(3), pages 226-243, October.
    2. Mazzei Matthew J. & Gangloff Ashley K. & Shook Christoper L., 2015. "Examining multi-level effects on corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility," Management & Marketing, De Gruyter Open, vol. 10(3), pages 163-184, October.
    3. Moisescu Ovidiu-Ioan, 2015. "Demographics-based differences in the relationship between perceived CSR and customer loyalty in the dairy products market," Management & Marketing, De Gruyter Open, vol. 10(2), pages 118-131, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eph:journl:v:9:y:2014:i:2:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Simona Vasilache). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.