IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comment on “Towards a paradigmatic foundation for accounting practice”


  • Richard Laughlin


Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide an analysis of the paper entitled “Towards a paradigmatic foundation for accounting practice” by Nørreklit, Nørreklit and Mitchell as a way to open a debate about whether a “paradigm of accounting practice” exists and, if so, the nature of the methodological approach that would be needed to discover its nature. Design/methodology/approach - The paper employs a critical, reflective discursive analysis. Findings - The main finding is that there is a confusion in the paper by Nørreklit Research limitations/implications - The implication of the argument of this commentary is that the search for “paradigm of accounting practice” is important and should be pursued but the choice of an appropriate methodology for this discovery still needs further consideration. Originality/value - Nørreklit

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Laughlin, 2010. "A comment on “Towards a paradigmatic foundation for accounting practice”," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 23(6), pages 759-763, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:aaajpp:v:23:y:2010:i:6:p:759-763

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Hanne Nørreklit & Lennart Nørreklit & Falconer Mitchell, 2010. "Paradigms and pragmatic constructivism: a reply," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 23(6), pages 764-773, August.
    2. repec:eee:crpeac:v:24:y:2013:i:3:p:211-224 is not listed on IDEAS


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:aaajpp:v:23:y:2010:i:6:p:759-763. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Virginia Chapman). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.