IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v173y2025ics0967070x25003567.html

Spatial patterns, implementation barriers, and facilitators in Seoul's E-scooter parking corral system: A mixed-methods analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Moon, Seol Ah
  • Shin, Eun Jin

Abstract

The rapid rise of shared e-scooters has raised concerns about disorderly parking, which negatively impacts pedestrian safety and public space management. Consequently, many cities worldwide have recently introduced designated parking corrals; however, their implementation remains in its early stages and has received limited academic attention. This study examines the distribution of shared e-scooter parking corrals in Seoul, South Korea, using spatial analysis to assess their spatial inequality and alignment with demand. In addition, in-depth interviews with key stakeholders and an analysis of media coverage and policy documents identify the challenges and facilitating factors shaping corral implementation and explaining the observed spatial patterns. The findings reveal an overall shortage of e-scooter corrals and stark disparities across neighborhoods and districts, with only a few areas relatively well-served. A clear spatial mismatch emerges between e-scooter parking supply and demand. Qualitative analysis identifies multiple implementation barriers, many of which stem from Seoul's centralized governance structure and the absence of a national legal framework and an operator-permit system. These include a fragmented and non-binding regulatory framework, financial constraints, limited spatial availability, and the underutilization of existing corrals. Collectively, these factors hinder effective implementation and perpetuate the limited and uneven distribution of e-scooter parking infrastructure. Despite these challenges, this study finds that government-led multi-stakeholder collaboration can play a critical role in the effective implementation of e-scooter corrals. Drawing on these findings and situating them within a comparative context, this study proposes a policy framework for diagnosing and assessing the implementation capacity of e-scooter infrastructure policy in centralized governance contexts that lack a formal operator-permit system.

Suggested Citation

  • Moon, Seol Ah & Shin, Eun Jin, 2025. "Spatial patterns, implementation barriers, and facilitators in Seoul's E-scooter parking corral system: A mixed-methods analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:173:y:2025:i:c:s0967070x25003567
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103813
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25003567
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103813?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brown, Austin L & D'Agostino, Mollie C & Fuller, Samuel J, 2021. "Local Policies for Better Micromobility," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt2512g04j, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    2. Liu, Hung-Chi & Lin, Jen-Jia, 2022. "Associations of built environments with spatiotemporal patterns of shared scooter use: A comparison with shared bike use," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 107-119.
    3. Qianling Jiang & Sheng-Jung Ou & Wei Wei, 2019. "Why Shared Bikes of Free-Floating Systems Were Parked Out of Order? A Preliminary Study based on Factor Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Sungchul Cho & Up Lim, 2019. "Residential mobility and social trust in urban neighborhoods in the Seoul metropolitan area, Korea," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 63(1), pages 117-145, August.
    5. Reinhardt, Karl & Deakin, Elizabeth SM., J.D., 2020. "Best Practices for the Public Management of Electric Scooters," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt8x67x360, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    6. Riggs, William & Kawashima, Matt & Batstone, David, 2021. "Exploring best practice for municipal e-scooter policy in the United States," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 18-27.
    7. Fuller, Sam & Fitch, Dillon & D'Agostino, Mollie C., 2021. "Local Policies for Better Micromobility," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt8mw5j82x, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    8. repec:osf:socarx:su8wx_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Clare Field & Ihnji Jon, 2021. "E-Scooters: A New Smart Mobility Option? The Case of Brisbane, Australia," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 368-396, May.
    10. Zhang, Yuting & Nelson, John D. & Mulley, Corinne, 2024. "Learning from the evidence: Insights for regulating e-scooters," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 63-74.
    11. Psarrou Kalakoni, Anna Mariam & Christoforou, Zoi & Gioldasis, Christos, 2024. "The ambivalent relationship of e-scooters and public transport: Evidence from France," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 215-229.
    12. Yin, Zehui & Rybarczyk, Greg & Zheng, Anran & Su, Lin & Sun, Bingrong & Yan, Xiang, 2024. "Shared micromobility as a first- and last-mile transit solution? Spatiotemporal insights from a novel dataset," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    13. Sobrino, Natalia & Gonzalez, Juan Nicolas & Vassallo, Jose Manuel & Baeza, Maria de los Angeles, 2023. "Regulation of shared electric kick scooters in urban areas: Key drivers from expert stakeholders," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1-18.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dzięcielski, Michał & Dobruszkes, Frédéric & Nikitas, Alexandros & Radzimski, Adam, 2025. "Assessing the impacts of free-floating shared micromobility services on docked bike-sharing: Insights from the case studies of Poznań and Brussels," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    2. Greaves, Stephen & Beck, Matthew & Rose, Geoff & Crane, Melanie, 2025. "Public views on legalising e-scooters: Insights from a Sydney case study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    3. Chien, Yu-Shyun & Lu, Chung-Cheng, 2025. "Investigating users’ intention to re-use shared electric scooters through a combined behavioral model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 533-544.
    4. Shah, Nitesh R. & Ziedan, Abubakr & Brakewood, Candace & Cherry, Christopher R., 2023. "Shared e-scooter service providers with large fleet size have a competitive advantage: Findings from e-scooter demand and supply analysis of Nashville, Tennessee," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    5. Wei, Daqin & Zhang, Hongyang & Tang, Wei & Gong, Jinrui & Mei, Zhenyu, 2025. "Investigating the influencing factors of cooperation between shared e-bikes and subway systems: A multivariate data analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    6. Brousseau, Eric & Côme, Etienne & Coulombel, Nicolas & Olave-Cruz, Isac, 2025. "Harmonizing dockless E-scooters: insights from Paris," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    7. Giovannipaolo Ferrari & Yingxin Tan & Paolo Diana & Maria Palazzo, 2024. "The Platformisation of Cycling—The Development of Bicycle-Sharing Systems in China: Innovation, Urban and Social Regeneration and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-13, June.
    8. repec:hal:wpaper:hal-04017908 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Budnitz, Hannah & Jaskólski, Marek & Knapskog, Marianne & Lis-Plesińska, Aleksandra & Schmidt, Filip & Szymanowski, Rafał & der Craats, Jasmijn van & Schwanen, Tim, 2025. "Multi-level governance and modal thinking: Tensions in electric mobility transitions in European cities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 63-72.
    10. Abouelela, Mohamed & Durán-Rodas, David & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2024. "Do we all need shared E-scooters? An accessibility-centered spatial equity evaluation approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    11. Hsueh, Chieh & Lin, Jen-Jia, 2023. "Influential factors of the route choices of scooter riders: A GPS-based data study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    12. Su, Duan & Wang, Yacan & Yang, Nan & Wang, Xianghong, 2020. "Promoting considerate parking behavior in dockless bike-sharing: An experimental study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 153-165.
    13. Sobrino, Natalia & Gonzalez, Juan Nicolas & Vassallo, Jose Manuel & Baeza, Maria de los Angeles, 2023. "Regulation of shared electric kick scooters in urban areas: Key drivers from expert stakeholders," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1-18.
    14. Dandan Xu & Yang Bian & Jian Rong & Jiachuan Wang & Baocai Yin, 2019. "Study on Clustering of Free-Floating Bike-Sharing Parking Time Series in Beijing Subway Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Wang, Yacan & Yang, Ying & Wang, Jiaping & Douglas, Matthew & Su, Duan, 2021. "Examining the influence of social norms on orderly parking behavior of dockless bike-sharing users," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 284-296.
    16. Bergh, Andreas & Mehic, Adrian & Sandberg, David & Wernberg, Joakim, 2025. "E-scooters and Traffic Accidents: Evidence from Staggered Roll-Out in Swedish Municipalities," Working Paper Series 1520, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    17. Kimpton, Anthony & Loginova, Julia & Pojani, Dorina & Bean, Richard & Sigler, Thomas & Corcoran, Jonathan, 2022. "Weather to scoot? How weather shapes shared e-scooter ridership patterns," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    18. Fanglin Chen & Zhongfei Chen, 2024. "Cultural shock of high‐speed rail: Evidence from social trust," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 527-554, March.
    19. Adorean, Emanuel-Cristian & Nofre, Jordi & Moura, Filipe, 2026. "Clustering users and non-users of shared and private e-bikes and e-scooters across three European cities: Typologies, spatial patterns, and policy implications," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    20. Chen, Shuting & Cao, Zhejing & Zhang, Xiaohu, 2025. "Adaptive scootability index: Built environment, travel purpose and e-scooter preferred route," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    21. Carlos Calan & Natalia Sobrino & Jose Manuel Vassallo, 2024. "Understanding Life-Cycle Greenhouse-Gas Emissions of Shared Electric Micro-Mobility: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-22, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:173:y:2025:i:c:s0967070x25003567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.