IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v171y2025icp225-238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining riders' subjective equity standards for transit Service: How will they shape future transit planning and operations?

Author

Listed:
  • Aeschliman, Spencer
  • Huang, Erik
  • Hofstra, Amy
  • Stathopoulos, Amanda

Abstract

Transportation equity is built on the foundation of distributing the benefits and costs resulting from policies and plans in a fair, just, and inclusive manner. However, with the varied and sometimes vague normative interpretations and definitions of equity, there remains a lack of clarity on what equity truly means for different stakeholders. Subjective viewpoints of equity within the public remain largely unexplored, leaving a critical gap in the understanding of societal expectations of transportation equity. This article investigates the subjective equity viewpoints of transit users. The goal of this research is to examine diverse user perceptions of equity standards informed by distributive justice theories, which describe how society should distribute transit benefits among users. The modeling relies on a 2022 survey of 2640 public transportation riders in the wider Chicago area. Using latent class analysis, we identify preference segmentation in transit equity standards, revealing four distinct classes of equity ideals and highlighting a plurality of rider values. We link class membership probabilities to rider profiles, ridership barriers, and land-use variables, uncovering the nuanced determinants of class belonging. Our discussion addresses the implications for transit planning and policy, emphasizing the importance of acknowledging plurality of subjective equity standards. We anticipate that these findings will influence future planning processes, and engagement strategies, and help identify the root causes of perceived inequities in public transit.

Suggested Citation

  • Aeschliman, Spencer & Huang, Erik & Hofstra, Amy & Stathopoulos, Amanda, 2025. "Examining riders' subjective equity standards for transit Service: How will they shape future transit planning and operations?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 225-238.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:171:y:2025:i:c:p:225-238
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.06.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25002355
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.06.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:171:y:2025:i:c:p:225-238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.