IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v129y2022icp137-139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The reason MaaS is such a challenge: A note

Author

Listed:
  • Hensher, David A.

Abstract

This note highlights a number of issues that are linked to the ongoing challenge facing Mobility as a Service (MaaS). Give that unpackaged service levels of each mode are exactly the same as those offered as packaged modes, we do not know whether the gain in utility by offering packaged services as the sum of unpackaged services is utility adding (or whether the loss in utility is also a possibility)? If true, then what needs to be added in to increase expected utility? The considerations include financial and/or non-financial incentives, and content and functionality of a digital platform as a way of simplifying/reducing the effort required in making mobility decisions. For many people, they might be satisfied with what they already do, and exposing them to alternative mobility options through an App and packaging mobility services with incentives including multiservice incentives, may have no impact on their travel behaviour. This is the challenge and needs to be tested. Central to this challenge is identifying and quantifying what additional attributes and constraint changes are necessary to get an individual to move to a consideration stage (at least at this very early stage of persuasion in the diffusion of innovation) and then into an actionable testable mobility choice outcome.

Suggested Citation

  • Hensher, David A., 2022. "The reason MaaS is such a challenge: A note," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 137-139.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:129:y:2022:i:c:p:137-139
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.10.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X22002931
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.10.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hensher, David A. & Mulley, Corinne, 2021. "Hensher, D.A. and Mulley, C. Mobility bundling and cultural tribalism - Might passenger mobility plans through MaaS remain niche or are they truly scalable?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 172-175.
    2. Hensher, David A. & Nelson, John D. & Mulley, Corinne, 2022. "Electric car sharing as a service (ECSaaS) – Acknowledging the role of the car in the public mobility ecosystem and what it might mean for MaaS as eMaaS?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 212-216.
    3. David A. Hensher & Haoning Xi, 2022. "Mobility as a service (MaaS): are effort and seamlessness the keys to MaaS uptake?," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 269-272, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hensher, David A. & Mulley, Corinne & Nelson, John D., 2023. "What is an ideal (Utopian) mobility as a service (MaaS) framework? A communication note," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    2. Enoch, Marcus & Potter, Stephen, 2023. "MaaS (Mobility as a Service) market futures explored," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 31-40.
    3. Orozco-Fontalvo, Mauricio & Moura, Filipe, 2023. "Refocusing MaaS approach: A brief," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 340-342.
    4. Smith, Göran & Sørensen, Claus Hedegaard, 2023. "Public-private MaaS: Unchallenged assumptions and issues of conflict in Sweden," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hensher, David A. & Nelson, John D. & Mulley, Corinne, 2022. "Electric car sharing as a service (ECSaaS) – Acknowledging the role of the car in the public mobility ecosystem and what it might mean for MaaS as eMaaS?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 212-216.
    2. Mulley, Corinne & Nelson, John D. & Ho, Chinh & Hensher, David A., 2023. "MaaS in a regional and rural setting: Recent experience," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 75-85.
    3. Xi, Haoning & Liu, Wei & Waller, S. Travis & Hensher, David A. & Kilby, Philip & Rey, David, 2023. "Incentive-compatible mechanisms for online resource allocation in Mobility-as-a-Service systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 119-147.
    4. Wei Zhou & Haixia Wang & Victor Shi & Xiding Chen, 2022. "A Decision Model for Free-Floating Car-Sharing Providers for Sustainable and Resilient Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Jaroslav Mašek & Vladimíra Štefancová & Jaroslav Mazanec & Petra Juránková, 2023. "The Classification of Application Users Supporting and Facilitating Travel Mobility Using Two-Step Cluster Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Duan, Sophia Xiaoxia & Tay, Richard & Molla, Alemayehu & Deng, Hepu, 2022. "Predicting Mobility as a Service (MaaS) use for different trip categories: An artificial neural network analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 135-149.
    7. Enoch, Marcus & Potter, Stephen, 2023. "MaaS (Mobility as a Service) market futures explored," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 31-40.
    8. Tanto Adi Waluyo & Muhammad Zudhy Irawan & Dewanti, 2022. "Adopting Electric Motorcycles for Ride-Hailing Services: Influential Factors from Driver’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    9. Li, Zheng & Zeng, Jingjing & Hensher, David A., 2023. "An efficient approach to structural breaks and the case of automobile gasoline consumption in Australia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:129:y:2022:i:c:p:137-139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.