IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v207y2026ics1366554525006556.html

Cost allocation in a robust two-stage resource allocation game: Fairness and robustness

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Menghang
  • Lu, Lan
  • Liu, Lindong
  • Wu, Jie

Abstract

This paper considers a two-stage resource allocation game within a cooperative game framework from a platform perspective, where the customers’ demands are uncertain. To incentivize all customers (players) into the grand coalition for joint cost sharing in resource allocation, a critical issue for the platform is determining a fair and robust cost allocation solution. To address the challenge, we introduce the concept of the strict robust core to the operations research (OR) game with constraints and propose the Two-stage Resource Allocation-Robust Cost Sharing Problem (TRA-RCSP). Our approach integrates distributionally robust optimization (DRO) and distributionally favorable optimization (DFO) to improve computational tractability. By leveraging the polyhedral ambiguity set to model demand uncertainty, we calculate the worst-case cost for grand coalition and the best-case costs for subcoalitions. Additionally, we develop an iterative constraint generation algorithm to mitigate the exponential growth of constraints in TRA-RCSP. Numerical experiments demonstrate that our algorithm achieves excellent computational efficiency and the strict robust core significantly outperforms the cost allocation of SAA model across both robustness performance metrics, ensuring the formation of the grand cooperation and its long-term stability under uncertain demands.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Menghang & Lu, Lan & Liu, Lindong & Wu, Jie, 2026. "Cost allocation in a robust two-stage resource allocation game: Fairness and robustness," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:207:y:2026:i:c:s1366554525006556
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2025.104633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525006556
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2025.104633?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:207:y:2026:i:c:s1366554525006556. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.