IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v179y2023ics1366554523002855.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maximizing truck platooning participation with preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Barua, Limon
  • Zou, Bo
  • Choobchian, Pooria

Abstract

Truck platooning refers to trucks traveling in convoy with longitudinal proximity. By reducing aerodynamic drag, platooning cuts truck energy use and operating cost along with other benefits to the freight transportation system. This research proposes a platform-based platooning system to maximize the participation of truck platooning considering stability of the formed platoons that arises from truck preferences of platooning partners. Preference-based platooning is of both scientific interest and practical importance to the trucking sector, which is highly fragmented especially in the US. The preferences depend on the benefits of fuel saving and schedule adjustment to coordinate the time for platoon formation. The formed platoons are stable in the sense that no two trucks in two platoons want to break away from their current platoons and platoon with each other. Tackling this operation planning problem, the proposed system involves a platform interacting with individual trucks in a way that reduces truck communication and computation burdens, mitigates truck privacy concerns, and overcomes trucks misreporting private information. The central methodological investigation of the interactive process is on how to solve the Maximum Stable Truck Platooning Participation (MS-TPP) problem, for which a two-phase algorithmic approach is proposed. The underlying idea of this approach is to progressively reduce the lengths of truck preference lists, by eliminating truck pairs that do not affect the MS-TPP solution presence and separating trucks in odd rotations – which are key constructs in this approach – from the rest of the truck population. Theoretical properties and computational complexity of this two-phase algorithmic approach are investigated, along with a comparison with an integer programming approach and extensive numerical experiments in the context of a northern Illinois road network in the US. We find that the proposed two-phase algorithmic approach is very efficient compared to the integer programming approach in forming a maximum number of truck platoons while ensuring stability. In addition, the percentage of trucks that end up platooning by solving MS-TPP is much greater than using a greedy approach. The algorithmic approach is computationally scalable for solving large problem instances. The advantages of MS-TPP, in terms of the percentage of trucks in platooning and the average utility gain, become even more prominent as we deal with a larger system with more trucks.

Suggested Citation

  • Barua, Limon & Zou, Bo & Choobchian, Pooria, 2023. "Maximizing truck platooning participation with preferences," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:179:y:2023:i:c:s1366554523002855
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2023.103297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554523002855
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2023.103297?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bouchery, Yann & Hezarkhani, Behzad & Stauffer, Gautier, 2022. "Coalition formation and cost sharing for truck platooning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 15-34.
    2. Sun, Xiaotong & Yin, Yafeng, 2021. "Decentralized game-theoretical approaches for behaviorally-stable and efficient vehicle platooning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 45-69.
    3. Bian, Zheyong & Liu, Xiang, 2019. "Mechanism design for first-mile ridesharing based on personalized requirements part I: Theoretical analysis in generalized scenarios," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 147-171.
    4. Echenique, Federico & Pereyra, Juan Sebastián, 2016. "Strategic complementarities and unraveling in matching markets," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 11(1), January.
    5. Noruzoliaee, Mohamadhossein & Zou, Bo & Zhou, Yan (Joann), 2021. "Truck platooning in the U.S. national road network: A system-level modeling approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    6. Teo, Chung-Piaw & Sethuraman, Jay, 2000. "On a cutting plane heuristic for the stable roommates problem and its applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 195-205, May.
    7. Sun, Xiaotong & Yin, Yafeng, 2021. "An auction mechanism for platoon leader determination in single-brand cooperative vehicle platooning," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).
    8. Bhoopalam, Anirudh Kishore & Agatz, Niels & Zuidwijk, Rob, 2018. "Planning of truck platoons: A literature review and directions for future research," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 212-228.
    9. Browand, Fred & McArthur, John & Radovich, Charles, 2004. "Fuel Saving Achieved in the Field Test of Two Tandem Trucks," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt29v570mm, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    10. Scholl, Joachim & Boysen, Nils & Scholl, Armin, 2023. "E-platooning: Optimizing platoon formation for long-haul transportation with electric commercial vehicles," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(2), pages 525-542.
    11. Jana Hajduková, 2006. "Coalition Formation Games: A Survey," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(04), pages 613-641.
    12. Boysen, Nils & Briskorn, Dirk & Schwerdfeger, Stefan, 2018. "The identical-path truck platooning problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 26-39.
    13. Larsen, Rune & Rich, Jeppe & Rasmussen, Thomas Kjær, 2019. "Hub-based truck platooning: Potentials and profitability," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 249-264.
    14. Chen, Shukai & Wang, Hua & Meng, Qiang, 2021. "Autonomous truck scheduling for container transshipment between two seaport terminals considering platooning and speed optimization," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 289-315.
    15. Abdolmaleki, Mojtaba & Shahabi, Mehrdad & Yin, Yafeng & Masoud, Neda, 2021. "Itinerary planning for cooperative truck platooning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 91-110.
    16. Liang, Renchao & Wang, Junwei & Huang, Min & Jiang, Zhong-Zhong, 2020. "Truthful auctions for e-market logistics services procurement with quantity discounts," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 165-180.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Shukai & Wang, Hua & Meng, Qiang, 2023. "Cost allocation of cooperative autonomous truck platooning: Efficiency and stability analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 119-141.
    2. Bouchery, Yann & Hezarkhani, Behzad & Stauffer, Gautier, 2022. "Coalition formation and cost sharing for truck platooning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 15-34.
    3. Sun, Xiaotong & Yin, Yafeng, 2021. "Decentralized game-theoretical approaches for behaviorally-stable and efficient vehicle platooning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 45-69.
    4. Yifeng Han & Tomoya Kawasaki & Shinya Hanaoka, 2022. "The Benefits of Truck Platooning with an Increasing Market Penetration: A Case Study in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, July.
    5. Boshuai Zhao & Roel Leus, 2022. "An improved decomposition-based heuristic for truck platooning," Papers 2210.05562, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
    6. Noruzoliaee, Mohamadhossein & Zou, Bo & Zhou, Yan (Joann), 2021. "Truck platooning in the U.S. national road network: A system-level modeling approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    7. Huailei Cheng & Yuhong Wang & Dan Chong & Chao Xia & Lijun Sun & Jenny Liu & Kun Gao & Ruikang Yang & Tian Jin, 2023. "Truck platooning reshapes greenhouse gas emissions of the integrated vehicle-road infrastructure system," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Abdolmaleki, Mojtaba & Shahabi, Mehrdad & Yin, Yafeng & Masoud, Neda, 2021. "Itinerary planning for cooperative truck platooning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 91-110.
    9. Kishore Bhoopalam, A. & Agatz, N.A.H. & Zuidwijk, R.A., 2020. "Spatial and Temporal Synchronization of Truck Platoons," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2020-014-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    10. Yan, Xiaoyuan & Xu, Min & Xie, Chi, 2023. "Local container drayage problem with improved truck platooning operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    11. Xiong, Xi & Sha, Junyi & Jin, Li, 2021. "Optimizing coordinated vehicle platooning: An analytical approach based on stochastic dynamic programming," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 482-502.
    12. Chen, Shukai & Wang, Hua & Meng, Qiang, 2021. "Autonomous truck scheduling for container transshipment between two seaport terminals considering platooning and speed optimization," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 289-315.
    13. Xue, Zhaojie & Lin, Hui & You, Jintao, 2021. "Local container drayage problem with truck platooning mode," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    14. Sindi, Safaa & Woodman, Roger, 2021. "Implementing commercial autonomous road haulage in freight operations: An industry perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 235-253.
    15. Ramirez Ibarra, Monica & Saphores, Jean-Daniel M., 2023. "1,000 HP electric drayage trucks as a substitute for new freeway lanes construction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    16. Chen, Rui & Meng, Qiang & Jia, Peng, 2022. "Container port drayage operations and management: Past and future," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    17. You, Jintao & Wang, Yuan & Xue, Zhaojie, 2023. "An exact algorithm for the multi-trip container drayage problem with truck platooning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    18. Marzano, Vittorio & Tinessa, Fiore & Fiori, Chiara & Tocchi, Daniela & Papola, Andrea & Aponte, Dario & Cascetta, Ennio & Simonelli, Fulvio, 2022. "Impacts of truck platooning on the multimodal freight transport market: An exploratory assessment on a case study in Italy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 100-125.
    19. Li, Qianwen & Li, Xiaopeng, 2022. "Trajectory planning for autonomous modular vehicle docking and autonomous vehicle platooning operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    20. Vitalii Naumov & Olha Shulika & Oleksandra Orda & Hanna Vasiutina & Marek Bauer & Myroslav Oliskevych, 2022. "Shaping the Optimal Technology for Servicing the Long-Distance Deliveries of Packaged Cargo by Road Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:179:y:2023:i:c:s1366554523002855. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.