IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v37y2003i7p615-640.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi-modal supply-demand equilibrium model for predicting intercity freight flows

Author

Listed:
  • Fernández L., J. Enrique
  • de Cea Ch., Joaquín
  • O., Alexandra Soto

Abstract

In this paper a new approach to intercity freight transportation system modeling is developed. Modeling formulation considers supply-demand equilibrium, where the demand side represents the behavior of shippers (cargo owners) and the supply side represents the behavior of carriers (transportation operators). Shippers decisions considered include choice of destination, mode, carrier for pure modes and transfer point for combined modes. Carriers take routing decisions over a multi-modal, multi-product and multi-operator network. A new mathematical formulation, not known before, is proposed to find consistent equilibrium solutions for modal O-D shipments, network flows and levels of service. Necessary conditions are deduced to show that the solutions obtained, from the mathematical formulations proposed, satisfy the behavioral principles assumed in each case. It is shown that special rationality conditions are required, with respect to fares charged and network routing decisions, to obtain consistent supply-demand equilibrium solutions. Sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of solutions to diagonalized versions of the mathematical problem formulated are deduced. Finally, a general solution approach is proposed and an application example is developed to illustrate the characteristics of the model and solution algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernández L., J. Enrique & de Cea Ch., Joaquín & O., Alexandra Soto, 2003. "A multi-modal supply-demand equilibrium model for predicting intercity freight flows," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 615-640, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:37:y:2003:i:7:p:615-640
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191-2615(02)00042-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Enrique Fernandez & Joaquin de Cea & Michael Florian & Enrique Cabrera, 1994. "Network Equilibrium Models with Combined Modes," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 182-192, August.
    2. W. J. Hurley & E. R. Petersen, 1994. "Nonlinear Tariffs and Freight Network Equilibrium," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 236-245, August.
    3. H C W L Williams, 1977. "On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefit," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 9(3), pages 285-344, March.
    4. Horowitz, Alan J., 1989. "Tests of an ad hoc algorithm of elastic- demand equilibrium traffic assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 309-313, August.
    5. Patrick T. Harker, 1988. "Multiple Equilibrium Behaviors on Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 39-46, February.
    6. Terry L. Friesz & Joel A. Gottfried & Edward K. Morlok, 1986. "A Sequential Shipper-Carrier Network Model for Predicting Freight Flows," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 80-91, May.
    7. Jacques Guélat & Michael Florian & Teodor Gabriel Crainic, 1990. "A Multimode Multiproduct Network Assignment Model for Strategic Planning of Freight Flows," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 25-39, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luce Brotcorne & Martine Labbé & Patrice Marcotte & Gilles Savard, 2000. "A Bilevel Model and Solution Algorithm for a Freight Tariff-Setting Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 289-302, August.
    2. Shibasaki, Ryuichi & Ieda, Hitoshi & Watanabe, Tomihiro, 2005. "An International Container Shipping Model in East Asia and its Transferability," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 299-336, January.
    3. Li, Xinyan & Xie, Chi & Bao, Zhaoyao, 2022. "A multimodal multicommodity network equilibrium model with service capacity and bottleneck congestion for China-Europe containerized freight flows," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    4. Casavant, Ken & Jessup, Eric, 2005. "What Makes them Viable? Determining the Attributes that Offer Potential Viability to Inter-Modal Truck-Rail Facilities in Washington State," 46th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Washington, D.C., March 6-8, 2005 208221, Transportation Research Forum.
    5. Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Laporte, Gilbert, 1997. "Planning models for freight transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 409-438, March.
    6. Francesco Corman & Francesco Viti & Rudy R. Negenborn, 2017. "Equilibrium models in multimodal container transport systems," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 125-153, March.
    7. Engebrethsen, Erna & Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane, 2019. "Transportation mode selection in inventory models: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(1), pages 1-25.
    8. Chow, Joseph Y.J. & Ritchie, Stephen G. & Jeong, Kyungsoo, 2014. "Nonlinear inverse optimization for parameter estimation of commodity-vehicle-decoupled freight assignment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 71-91.
    9. Hao Wang & Linda Nozick & Ningxiong Xu & Jared Gearhart, 2018. "Modeling ocean, rail, and truck transportation flows to support policy analysis," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 20(3), pages 327-357, September.
    10. Majbah Uddin & Nathan Huynh, 2019. "Reliable Routing of Road-Rail Intermodal Freight under Uncertainty," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 929-952, September.
    11. E. Nikolova & N. E. Stier-Moses, 2014. "A Mean-Risk Model for the Traffic Assignment Problem with Stochastic Travel Times," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 366-382, April.
    12. de Jong, Gerard & Daly, Andrew & Pieters, Marits & van der Hoorn, Toon, 2007. "The logsum as an evaluation measure: Review of the literature and new results," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(9), pages 874-889, November.
    13. Xinyuan Chen & Ruyang Yin & Qinhe An & Yuan Zhang, 2021. "Modeling a Distance-Based Preferential Fare Scheme for Park-and-Ride Services in a Multimodal Transport Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, March.
    14. Maher, Mike, 1998. "Algorithms for logit-based stochastic user equilibrium assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 539-549, November.
    15. Viauroux, Christelle, 2007. "Structural estimation of congestion costs," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 1-25, January.
    16. Stephane Hess & John W. Polak, 2004. "An analysis of parking behaviour using discrete choice models calibrated on SP datasets," ERSA conference papers ersa04p60, European Regional Science Association.
    17. Sylvain Sorin & Cheng Wan, 2013. "Delegation equilibrium payoffs in integer-splitting games," Post-Print hal-02885954, HAL.
    18. Cantillo, Víctor & Heydecker, Benjamin & de Dios Ortúzar, Juan, 2006. "A discrete choice model incorporating thresholds for perception in attribute values," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 807-825, November.
    19. Michael Scheidler & Reinhard Hujer & Joachim Grammig, 2005. "Discrete choice modelling in airline network management," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(4), pages 467-486.
    20. Roger Vickerman & Klaus Spiekermann & Michael Wegener, 1999. "Accessibility and Economic Development in Europe," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 1-15.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:37:y:2003:i:7:p:615-640. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.