IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v170y2023icp91-118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling the impact of e-hailing services on regional public transit considering transit-dependent people

Author

Listed:
  • Hayakawa, Keiichiro
  • Chikaraishi, Makoto

Abstract

We propose an analytical model to theoretically and numerically examine the impact of the introduction of e-hailing services into a region with traditional public transit, considering transit-dependent people who cannot drive themselves. For simplicity, this study considers many-to-one trip demand in a monocentric linear city. Our theoretical investigations confirm that in the short term when the service level of public transit is fixed, automobile users shift to public transit due to road congestion in the city center brought on by e-hailing services. For non-auto users, there exists an optimal connecting point where users transfer from feeder e-hailing services to public transit. Our theoretical analysis reveals that in the long term when public transit provider changes the service frequency according to the ridership, (1) the optimal connecting point remains at the same location, and (2) all public transit users in the suburb side of the optimal connecting point shifts to feeder e-hailing services. Our numerical investigations further reveal that the impact of e-hailing services on regional public transit depends on the regional dependency on automobiles. Shortly after introducing e-hailing services, the costs of users would significantly increase in a transit-dependent region, while the revenue of public transit significantly decreases in an automobile-dependent region. In the long term, the total cost for users is higher in all scenario settings compared to the base scenario without e-hailing services, which is analogous to the well-known Downs–Thomson paradox. Based on the above results, we discuss possible integrated regional transportation designs to realize desirable long-term outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Hayakawa, Keiichiro & Chikaraishi, Makoto, 2023. "Modeling the impact of e-hailing services on regional public transit considering transit-dependent people," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 91-118.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:170:y:2023:i:c:p:91-118
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2023.02.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019126152300022X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2023.02.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Tian-Liang & Huang, Hai-Jun & Yang, Hai & Zhang, Xiaoning, 2009. "Continuum modeling of park-and-ride services in a linear monocentric city with deterministic mode choice," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 692-707, July.
    2. Kraus, Marvin, 2003. "A new look at the two-mode problem," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 511-530, November.
    3. Taylor, Brian D & Garrett, Mark, 1999. "Reconsidering Social Equity in Public Transit," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2bm7b38n, University of California Transportation Center.
    4. Richard Arnott & An Yan, 2000. "The Two-Mode Problem: Second-Best Pricing and Capacity," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 474, Boston College Department of Economics.
    5. Wang, Hai & Yang, Hai, 2019. "Ridesourcing systems: A framework and review," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 122-155.
    6. Wang, Judith Y. T. & Yang, Hai & Lindsey, Robin, 2004. "Locating and pricing park-and-ride facilities in a linear monocentric city with deterministic mode choice," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 709-731, September.
    7. Richard Arnott & An Yan, 2000. "The Two†Mode Problem: Second†Best Pricing and Capacity," Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 170-199, November.
    8. Zhang, Fangni & Lindsey, Robin & Yang, Hai, 2016. "The Downs–Thomson paradox with imperfect mode substitutes and alternative transit administration regimes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 104-127.
    9. Kraus, Marvin, 2012. "Road pricing with optimal mass transit," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 81-86.
    10. Bar-Yosef, Asaf & Martens, Karel & Benenson, Itzhak, 2013. "A model of the vicious cycle of a bus line," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 37-50.
    11. Basso, Leonardo J. & Jara-Díaz, Sergio R., 2012. "Integrating congestion pricing, transit subsidies and mode choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 890-900.
    12. Dorina Pojani & Dominic Stead, 2015. "Sustainable Urban Transport in the Developing World: Beyond Megacities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-22, June.
    13. d'Ouville, Edmond L. & McDonald, John F., 1990. "Optimal road capacity with a suboptimal congestion toll," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 34-49, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Wei (Walker) & Wang, David Z.W. & Zhang, Fangni & Sun, Huijun & Zhang, Wenyi & Wu, Jianjun, 2017. "Overcoming the Downs-Thomson Paradox by transit subsidy policies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 126-147.
    2. Zhang, Fangni & Yang, Hai & Liu, Wei, 2014. "The Downs–Thomson Paradox with responsive transit service," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 244-263.
    3. Li, Zhi-Chun & Zhang, Liping, 2020. "The two-mode problem with bottleneck queuing and transit crowding: How should congestion be priced using tolls and fares?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 46-76.
    4. Zhu, Zheng & Xu, Ailing & He, Qiao-Chu & Yang, Hai, 2021. "Competition between the transportation network company and the government with subsidies to public transit riders," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    5. Liu, Wei & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2017. "Doubly dynamics for multi-modal networks with park-and-ride and adaptive pricing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 162-179.
    6. Beaudoin, Justin & Farzin, Y. Hossein & Lin Lawell, C.-Y. Cynthia, 2015. "Public transit investment and sustainable transportation: A review of studies of transit's impact on traffic congestion and air quality," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 15-22.
    7. Kraus, Marvin, 2012. "Road pricing with optimal mass transit," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 81-86.
    8. Kraus, Marvin, 2003. "A new look at the two-mode problem," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 511-530, November.
    9. Jairo Ortega & János Tóth & Tamás Péter & Sarbast Moslem, 2020. "An Integrated Model of Park-And-Ride Facilities for Sustainable Urban Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, June.
    10. Kutzbach, Mark J., 2009. "Motorization in developing countries: Causes, consequences, and effectiveness of policy options," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 154-166, March.
    11. Xinyuan Chen & Ruyang Yin & Qinhe An & Yuan Zhang, 2021. "Modeling a Distance-Based Preferential Fare Scheme for Park-and-Ride Services in a Multimodal Transport Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, March.
    12. Guo, Ren-Yong & Szeto, W.Y. & Long, Jiancheng, 2020. "Trial-and-error operation schemes for bimodal transport systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 106-123.
    13. Hörcher, Daniel & De Borger, Bruno & Graham, Daniel J., 2023. "Subsidised transport services in a fiscal federation: Why local governments may be against decentralised service provision," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    14. Duncan, Michael & Christensen, Robert K., 2013. "An analysis of park-and-ride provision at light rail stations across the US," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 148-157.
    15. Gao, Ge & Sun, Huijun & Wu, Jianjun & Liu, Xinmin & Chen, Weiya, 2018. "Park-and-ride service design under a price-based tradable credits scheme in a linear monocentric city," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 1-12.
    16. Zhi-Chun Li & Li Cheng & André de Palma, 2023. "Ring road investment, cordon tolling, and urban spatial structure: Formulation and a case study," THEMA Working Papers 2023-07, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    17. Guo, Ren-Yong & Szeto, W.Y., 2018. "Day-to-day modal choice with a Pareto improvement or zero-sum revenue scheme," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 1-25.
    18. Vincent van den Berg & Erik T. Verhoef, 2011. "Congesting Pricing in a Road and Rail Network with Heterogeneous Values of Time and Schedule Delay," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 11-059/3, Tinbergen Institute, revised 24 May 2012.
    19. Ramos, Raúl & Silva, Hugo E., 2023. "Fare evasion in public transport: How does it affect the optimal design and pricing?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    20. Du, Bo & Wang, David Z.W., 2014. "Continuum modeling of park-and-ride services considering travel time reliability and heterogeneous commuters – A linear complementarity system approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 58-81.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:170:y:2023:i:c:p:91-118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.