IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v78y2015icp134-143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Engineering condition assessment of cycling infrastructure: Cyclists’ perceptions of satisfaction and comfort

Author

Listed:
  • Calvey, J.C.
  • Shackleton, J.P.
  • Taylor, M.D.
  • Llewellyn, R.

Abstract

The UK National Cycle Network comprises 23,660km of cycling and walking paths of which a significant percentage is dedicated off-road infrastructure. This represents a significant civil engineering infrastructure asset that currently contributes to the provision of a sustainable transport mode option nationwide. Commuting and recreational cyclists have observed the often hazardous conditions on these paths. There are various simple measures that could be taken to improve the maintenance of such off-road paths. Reliance on walk-over surveys (direct visual inspection) and path users notifying the local authority may not be tackling maintenance in a resource efficient manner. The proposed inspection method includes the use of an instrumented bicycle to examine cycle path condition through user perception of satisfaction and quality. A questionnaire was conducted to identify the attributes of off-road cycling infrastructure people find most important in relation to their personal satisfaction. An exploratory factor analysis was undertaken on perception study data to elucidate the determination of the variables associated with perceived user satisfaction. The study has shown that people find maintenance issues to be of high importance, especially surface issues. From exploratory factor analysis of results, satisfaction has been found to load with comfort and safety. Field testing was then conducted using subjective user opinions and objective vibration data. These results were then used to assist the creation of dedicated user perception based surface condition rating-scales.

Suggested Citation

  • Calvey, J.C. & Shackleton, J.P. & Taylor, M.D. & Llewellyn, R., 2015. "Engineering condition assessment of cycling infrastructure: Cyclists’ perceptions of satisfaction and comfort," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 134-143.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:78:y:2015:i:c:p:134-143
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856415001172
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joo, Shinhye & Oh, Cheol, 2013. "A novel method to monitor bicycling environments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-13.
    2. Meghan Winters & Gavin Davidson & Diana Kao & Kay Teschke, 2011. "Motivators and deterrents of bicycling: comparing influences on decisions to ride," Transportation, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 153-168, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gadsby, April & Hagenzieker, Marjan & Watkins, Kari, 2021. "An international comparison of the self-reported causes of cyclist stress using quasi-naturalistic cycling," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    2. Khashayar Kazemzadeh & Aliaksei Laureshyn & Lena Winslott Hiselius & Enrico Ronchi, 2020. "Expanding the Scope of the Bicycle Level-of-Service Concept: A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-30, April.
    3. Siying Zhu & Feng Zhu, 2020. "Multi-objective bike-way network design problem with space–time accessibility constraint," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 2479-2503, October.
    4. Nuñez, Javier Yesid Mahecha & Bisconsini, Danilo Rinaldi & Rodrigues da Silva, Antônio Nélson, 2020. "Combining environmental quality assessment of bicycle infrastructures with vertical acceleration measurements," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 447-458.
    5. Zhu, Siying & Zhu, Feng, 2019. "Cycling comfort evaluation with instrumented probe bicycle," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 217-231.
    6. Kyriakos Ketikidis & Apostolos Papagiannakis & Socrates Basbas, 2023. "Identifying and Modeling the Factors That Affect Bicycle Users’ Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Michael Hardinghaus & Simon Nieland & Marius Lehne & Jan Weschke, 2021. "More than Bike Lanes—A Multifactorial Index of Urban Bikeability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Synek, Stefan & Koenigstorfer, Joerg, 2018. "Exploring adoption determinants of tax-subsidized company-leasing bicycles from the perspective of German employers and employees," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 238-260.
    2. Anowar, Sabreena & Eluru, Naveen & Hatzopoulou, Marianne, 2017. "Quantifying the value of a clean ride: How far would you bicycle to avoid exposure to traffic-related air pollution?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 66-78.
    3. Chandra, Shailesh & Jimenez, Jose & Radhakrishnan, Ramalingam, 2017. "Accessibility evaluations for nighttime walking and bicycling for low-income shift workers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 97-108.
    4. Zhu, Siying & Zhu, Feng, 2019. "Cycling comfort evaluation with instrumented probe bicycle," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 217-231.
    5. Rupi, Federico & Freo, Marzia & Poliziani, Cristian & Postorino, Maria Nadia & Schweizer, Joerg, 2023. "Analysis of gender-specific bicycle route choices using revealed preference surveys based on GPS traces," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1-14.
    6. Liu, Xinbao & Yang, Tianji & Pei, Jun & Liao, Haitao & Pohl, Edward A., 2019. "Replacement and inventory control for a multi-customer product service system with decreasing replacement costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 561-574.
    7. Diogo Abrantes & Marta Campos Ferreira & Paulo Dias Costa & Joana Hora & Soraia Felício & Teresa Galvão Dias & Miguel Coimbra, 2023. "A New Perspective on Supporting Vulnerable Road Users’ Safety, Security and Comfort through Personalized Route Planning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-24, February.
    8. Congbao Xu & Jing Wang & Yanxue Li & Weijun Gao, 2023. "Evaluation and Optimization Design of Coastal Cycling Environment Based on Importance Performance Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    9. Lindsey Conrow & Siân Mooney & Elizabeth A Wentz, 2021. "The association between residential housing prices, bicycle infrastructure and ridership volumes," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(4), pages 787-808, March.
    10. Feizi, Ahmad & Mastali, Majid & Van Houten, Ron & Kwigizile, Valerian & Oh, Jun-Seok, 2021. "Effects of bicycle passing distance law on drivers’ behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 1-16.
    11. McArthur, David Philip & Hong, Jinhyun, 2019. "Visualising where commuting cyclists travel using crowdsourced data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 233-241.
    12. Lixuan Zhao & Dewei Fang & Yang Cao & Shan Sun & Liu Han & Yang Xue & Qian Zheng, 2023. "Impact-Asymmetric Analysis of Bike-Sharing Residents’ Satisfaction: A Case Study of Harbin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Malik, Faheem Ahmed & Egan, Robert & Dowling, Conor Mark & Caulfield, Brian, 2023. "Factors influencing e-cargo bike mode choice for small businesses," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    14. Zuo, Ting & Wei, Heng, 2019. "Bikeway prioritization to increase bicycle network connectivity and bicycle-transit connection: A multi-criteria decision analysis approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 52-71.
    15. Rohan L Aras & Nicholas T Ouellette & Rishee K Jain, 2023. "A barrier too far: Understanding the role of intersection crossing distance on bicycle rider behavior in Chicago," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(8), pages 2118-2132, October.
    16. Patel, Samir J. & Patel, Chetan R., 2020. "A stakeholders perspective on improving barriers in implementation of public bicycle sharing system (PBSS)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 353-366.
    17. Lake Sagaris, 2015. "Lessons from 40 years of planning for cycle‐inclusion: Reflections from Santiago, Chile," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 39(1), pages 64-81, February.
    18. Loidl, Martin & Traun, Christoph & Wallentin, Gudrun, 2016. "Spatial patterns and temporal dynamics of urban bicycle crashes—A case study from Salzburg (Austria)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 38-50.
    19. Osama, Ahmed & Sayed, Tarek & Bigazzi, Alexander Y., 2017. "Models for estimating zone-level bike kilometers traveled using bike network, land use, and road facility variables," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 14-28.
    20. Dandan Xu & Yang Bain & Shinan Shu & Xiaodong Zhang, 2022. "Staged Transition Process from Driving to Bicycling Based on the Effects of Latent Variables," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:78:y:2015:i:c:p:134-143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.