IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v206y2026ics0965856426000595.html

Airport accessibility assessment and shuttle bus scheduling across socioeconomic groups

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Tinghe
  • Li, Ang
  • Wu, Lingxiao
  • Jiang, Changmin

Abstract

Airport accessibility is a critical factor influencing air travel behavior, particularly for low-income travelers who face both economic and transit-related constraints. This study proposes the Fairness Airport Accessibility Metric (FAAM), a novel measure that captures disparities in accessibility across income groups by incorporating variations in travel options and behavioral responses. Building on this metric, we develop a dual-perspective, two-stage Airport Bus Scheduling and Allocation Model that reflects the differing priorities of public stakeholders. The government-led model first maximizes accessibility to ensure fair transit access across income groups, then minimizes operational costs under fairness constraints. The operator-led model, in contrast, begins by minimizing costs while maintaining baseline accessibility, and subsequently improves accessibility within those budgetary limits, capturing the trade-off between fairness and efficiency from both policy and operational standpoints. To validate the framework, we conduct a case study in Hong Kong, using actual flight schedules from Hong Kong International Airport (HKIA) combined with a synthetically constructed public transit network. The case study confirms significant spatial and income-based disparities in current airport accessibility and demonstrates the necessity of differentiated planning for diverse socioeconomic groups. Numerical experiments reveal that over-prioritizing low-income users can lead to underutilized system capacity, while favoring high-income users may improve overall efficiency but widen accessibility gaps. A balanced, fairness-driven weighting scheme provides inclusive service delivery without compromising operational feasibility. The findings highlight the importance of integrating income-responsive transit planning, fairness-aware scheduling algorithms, and targeted fare policies. Together, these strategies provide a scalable and adaptable framework for designing airport ground access systems that are both socially inclusive and operationally sustainable.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Tinghe & Li, Ang & Wu, Lingxiao & Jiang, Changmin, 2026. "Airport accessibility assessment and shuttle bus scheduling across socioeconomic groups," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:206:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426000595
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.104918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856426000595
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2026.104918?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ryerson, Megan S. & Kim, Amy M., 2018. "A drive for better air service: How air service imbalances across neighboring regions integrate air and highway demands," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 114(PA), pages 237-255.
    2. Fransisca Angelica Rahardja & Shih-Chih Chen & Untung Rahardja, 2022. "Review of Behavioral Psychology in Transition to Solar Photovoltaics for Low-Income Individuals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Hong, Seock-Jin & Kim, Woongyi & Hiatt, Brian, 2025. "Examining airport agility at air cargo hub airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    4. Grubesic, Tony H. & Wei, Fangwu, 2012. "Evaluating the efficiency of the Essential Air Service program in the United States," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1562-1573.
    5. Guillaume Burghouwt & Renato Redondi, 2013. "Connectivity in Air Transport Networks: An Assessment of Models and Applications," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 47(1), pages 35-53, January.
    6. He, Ping & Jin, Jian Gang & Schulte, Frederik, 2024. "The flexible airport bus and last-mile ride-sharing problem: Math-heuristic and metaheuristic approaches," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    7. Bergantino, Angela Stefania & Capurso, Mauro & Hess, Stephane, 2020. "Modelling regional accessibility to airports using discrete choice models: An application to a system of regional airports," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 855-871.
    8. Avogadro, Nicolò & Cattaneo, Mattia & Paleari, Stefano & Redondi, Renato, 2021. "Replacing short-medium haul intra-European flights with high-speed rail: Impact on CO2 emissions and regional accessibility," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 25-39.
    9. Kalakou, Sofia & Moura, Filipe, 2021. "Analyzing passenger behavior in airport terminals based on activity preferences," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    10. El-Geneidy, Ahmed & Levinson, David & Diab, Ehab & Boisjoly, Genevieve & Verbich, David & Loong, Charis, 2016. "The cost of equity: Assessing transit accessibility and social disparity using total travel cost," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 302-316.
    11. Hess, Stephane & Adler, Thomas & Polak, John W., 2007. "Modelling airport and airline choice behaviour with the use of stated preference survey data," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 221-233, May.
    12. Stephane Hess & John W. Polak, 2006. "Airport, airline and access mode choice in the San Francisco Bay area," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 85(4), pages 543-567, November.
    13. Bhadra, Dipasis, 2004. "Air Travel in Small Communities: An Econometric Framework and Results," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 43(01).
    14. Pan, Alexandra Q & Deakin, Elizabeth & Shaheen, Susan A, 2023. "Crabgrass confinement: Housing and transportation challenges of low- and moderate-income suburban residents in the San Francisco Bay Area," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt90f5j3mb, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    15. Prentice, Catherine & Kadan, Mariam, 2019. "The role of airport service quality in airport and destination choice," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 40-48.
    16. Fouad Ben Abdelaziz & Hatem Masri & Houda Alaya, 2017. "A recourse goal programming approach for airport bus routing problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 251(1), pages 383-396, April.
    17. Sihyun Yoo & Bert van Wee & Eric Molin, 2024. "Long distance accessibility by air transportation: a literature review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 811-833, July.
    18. Choi, Jong Hae & Wang, Kun & Xia, Wenyi & Zhang, Anming, 2019. "Determining factors of air passengers’ transfer airport choice in the Southeast Asia – North America market: Managerial and policy implications," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 203-216.
    19. Yoo, Sihyun & Beumer, Ruben & van Wee, Bert & Mouter, Niek & Molin, Eric, 2025. "Perceived accessibility by air transportation: A focus group study of potential air travelers in The Netherlands," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yoo, Sihyun & Beumer, Ruben & van Wee, Bert & Mouter, Niek & Molin, Eric, 2025. "Perceived accessibility by air transportation: A focus group study of potential air travelers in The Netherlands," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Allroggen, Florian & Wittman, Michael D. & Malina, Robert, 2015. "How air transport connects the world – A new metric of air connectivity and its evolution between 1990 and 2012," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 184-201.
    3. Cordera, Rubén & Luigi dell’Olio, & Sipone, Silvia & Moura, José Luis, 2024. "Modeling airport choice for a multi-airport area using a random parameter logit model," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    4. Lu, Jing & Meng, Yucan & Timmermans, Harry & Zhang, Anming, 2021. "Modeling hesitancy in airport choice: A comparison of discrete choice and machine learning methods," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 230-250.
    5. Cidell, Julie, 2014. "Spoke airports, intentional and unintentional ground travel, and the air travel decision-making process," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 113-123.
    6. Chang, Yu-Chun & Lee, Wei-Hao & Hsu, Chia-Jui, 2020. "Identifying competitive position for ten Asian aviation hubs," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 51-66.
    7. Li, Siping & Zhou, Yaoming & Kundu, Tanmoy & Zhang, Fangni, 2021. "Impact of entry restriction policies on international air transport connectivity during COVID-19 pandemic," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    8. Freund-Feinstein, Uzi & Bekhor, Shlomo, 2017. "An airline itinerary choice model that includes the option to delay the decision," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 64-78.
    9. Wittman, Michael D. & Allroggen, Florian & Malina, Robert, 2016. "Public service obligations for air transport in the United States and Europe: Connectivity effects and value for money," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 112-128.
    10. Birolini, Sebastian & Avogadro, Nicolò & Malighetti, Paolo & Paleari, Stefano, 2024. "Con-Accessibility: Logit-based catchment area modeling for strategic airport system planning," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    11. Cheung, Tommy K.Y. & Wong, Collin W.H. & Zhang, Anming, 2020. "The evolution of aviation network: Global airport connectivity index 2006–2016," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    12. Pagliari, Romano & Graham, Anne, 2020. "Airport competition within the Scottish lowlands region," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    13. Ishii, Jun & Jun, Sunyoung & Van Dender, Kurt, 2009. "Air travel choices in multi-airport markets," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 216-227, March.
    14. Teixeira, Filipe Marques & Derudder, Ben, 2021. "Spatio-temporal dynamics in airport catchment areas: The case of the New York Multi Airport Region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    15. Yang, Chih-Wen & Lu, Jin-Long & Hsu, Chun-Yen, 2014. "Modeling joint airport and route choice behavior for international and metropolitan airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 89-95.
    16. Fuellhart, Kurt & O’Connor, Kevin & Woltemade, Christopher, 2013. "Route-level passenger variation within three multi-airport regions in the USA," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 171-180.
    17. Fahad Alam & Qing Yang & Yapa Mahinda Bandara & Nisar Ahmad & Option Takunda Chiwaridzo, 2024. "The nexus between corporate social responsibility of airports and passenger satisfaction: A cross‐country study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 2454-2473, May.
    18. Nenem, Sukru & Graham, Anne & Dennis, Nigel, 2020. "Airline schedule and network competitiveness: A consumer-centric approach for business travel," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    19. Singh, Manjinder & Bansal, Prateek & Raj, Alok & Dixit, Aasheesh, 2023. "Eliciting preferences of Indians for air travel during COVID-19 pandemic," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    20. Maria Grazia Bellizzi & Luigi dell’Olio & Laura Eboli & Carmen Forciniti & Gabriella Mazzulla, 2020. "Passengers’ Expectations on Airlines’ Services: Design of a Stated Preference Survey and Preliminary Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:206:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426000595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.