IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v71y2022ics0160791x22002779.html

Bursting filter bubbles in a digital age: Opening minds and reducing opinion polarization through digital platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Einav, Gali
  • Allen, Ofir
  • Gur, Tamar
  • Maaravi, Yossi
  • Ravner, Daniel

Abstract

Filter Bubbles, exacerbated by use of digital platforms, have accelerated opinion polarization. This research builds on calls for interventions aimed at preventing or mitigating polarization. This research assesses the extent that an online digital platform, intentionally displaying two sides of an argument with methodology designed to “open minds” and aid readers willingness to consider an opposing view. This “open mindedness” can potentially penetrate online filter bubbles, alleviate polarization and promote social change in an era of exponential growth of discourse via digital platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Einav, Gali & Allen, Ofir & Gur, Tamar & Maaravi, Yossi & Ravner, Daniel, 2022. "Bursting filter bubbles in a digital age: Opening minds and reducing opinion polarization through digital platforms," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:71:y:2022:i:c:s0160791x22002779
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X22002779
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102136?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hetherington, Marc J., 2009. "Review Article: Putting Polarization in Perspective," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(2), pages 413-448, April.
    2. Lissitsa, Sabina, 2021. "Effects of digital use on trust in political institutions among ethnic minority and hegemonic group – A case study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    3. Xing, Yunfei & Wang, Xiwei & Qiu, Chengcheng & Li, Yueqi & He, Wu, 2022. "Research on opinion polarization by big data analytics capabilities in online social networks," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Galily, Yair, 2019. "“Shut up and dribble!”?Athletes activism in the age of twittersphere: The case of LeBron James," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    5. Alsaad, Abdallah & Taamneh, Abdallah & Al-Jedaiah, Mohamad Noor, 2018. "Does social media increase racist behavior? An examination of confirmation bias theory," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 41-46.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xing, Yunfei & Zhang, Justin Zuopeng & Teng, Guangqing & Zhou, Xiaotang, 2024. "Voices in the digital storm: Unraveling online polarization with ChatGPT," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    2. Yang, Hui & Li, Dan & Hu, Peng, 2024. "Decoding algorithm fatigue: The role of algorithmic literacy, information cocoons, and algorithmic opacity," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghosh, Soumili & Behera, Rajat Kumar & Bala, Pradip Kumar & Rana, Nripendra P., 2025. "Adverse impacts of metaverse-induced cognitive biases on the immersive shopping experience: A conceptual model developed from a qualitative approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    2. Özgür, Arslan-Ayaydin & Thewissen, James & Torsin, Wouter, 2021. "Earnings Management Methods and CEO Political Affiliation," LIDAM Discussion Papers LFIN 2021017, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Finance (LFIN).
    3. Leung, B. T. K., 2018. "Limited Cognitive Ability and Selective Information Processing," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1891, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    4. Abdallah Alsaad, 2018. "The Individualistic View Of Culture And The Nascent Entrepreneurship: An Examination Of Schwartz’S Cultural Values," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(04), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Hai-Bing Xiao & Feng Hu & You-Feng Zhao & Yu-Rong Song, 2025. "Constrained Optimal Control of Information Diffusion in Online Social Hypernetworks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-30, August.
    6. Leung, Benson Tsz Kin, 2020. "Limited cognitive ability and selective information processing," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 345-369.
    7. Muradian, Roldan & Pascual, Unai, 2020. "Ecological economics in the age of fear," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    8. Vrontis, Demetris & Siachou, Evangelia & Sakka, Georgia & Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Chaudhuri, Ranjan & Ghosh, Arka, 2022. "Societal effects of social media in organizations: Reflective points deriving from a systematic literature review and a bibliometric meta-analysis," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 151-162.
    9. Guangce Ruan & Lei Xia & Xin Wen & Yinuo Dong, 2025. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Exploring the Dynamic Interplay of User Characteristics and Topic Influence on Weibo: A Comprehensive Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 3030-3057, March.
    10. Ikan, Lotem & Lagziel, David & Raveh, Ohad, 2025. "Resource windfalls, connectivity, and political polarization," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    11. Xing, Yunfei & Zhang, Justin Zuopeng & Teng, Guangqing & Zhou, Xiaotang, 2024. "Voices in the digital storm: Unraveling online polarization with ChatGPT," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    12. Uslu, Osman, 2025. "Exploring the link between cyberloafing and work-related factors: A decade of systematic analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    13. Christina Biedny & Trey Malone & Jayson L. Lusk, 2020. "Exploring Polarization in US Food Policy Opinions," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(3), pages 434-454, September.
    14. Steven Jokinsky & Christine S. Lipsmeyer & Andrew Q. Philips & Laron K. Williams & Guy D. Whitten, 2024. "Look over there. Where? A compositional approach to the modeling of public opinion on the most important problem," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 105(4), pages 913-933, July.
    15. Veronika Patkós, 2023. "Measuring partisan polarization with partisan differences in satisfaction with the government: the introduction of a new comparative approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 39-57, February.
    16. Jain, Lokesh, 2022. "An entropy-based method to control COVID-19 rumors in online social networks using opinion leaders," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    17. Danowski, James A., 2025. "E-government and ideological polarization: A cross-national study of political communication," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    18. Can, Burak & Ozkes, Ali Ihsan & Storcken, Ton, 2015. "Measuring polarization in preferences," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 76-79.
    19. Ugur Ozdemir & Ali Ihsan Ozkes, 2014. "Measuring Public Preferential Polarization," Working Papers hal-00954497, HAL.
    20. Nathan Goldstein & David Lagziel & Ohad Raveh, 2025. "Political Rational Inattention: A New Measure With an Application to Political Polarization," Working Papers 2511, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:71:y:2022:i:c:s0160791x22002779. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.