IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v169y2021ics0167715220302650.html

Empirical likelihood based on synthetic right censored data

Author

Listed:
  • Liang, Wei
  • Dai, Hongsheng

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a Mean Empirical Likelihood (MeanEL) method for right censored data. This MeanEL approach is based on traditional empirical likelihood methods but uses synthetic data to construct an EL ratio statistics, which is shown to have a χ2 limiting distribution. Different simulation studies show that the MeanEL confidence intervals tend to have more accurate coverage probabilities than other existing Empirical Likelihood methods. Theoretical comparisons of different EL methods are also provided under a general framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Liang, Wei & Dai, Hongsheng, 2021. "Empirical likelihood based on synthetic right censored data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:169:y:2021:i:c:s0167715220302650
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2020.108962
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715220302650
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2020.108962?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qi-Hua Wang & Bing-Yi Jing, 2001. "Empirical Likelihood for a Class of Functionals of Survival Distribution with Censored Data," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 53(3), pages 517-527, September.
    2. Liang, Wei & Dai, Hongsheng & He, Shuyuan, 2019. "Mean Empirical Likelihood," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 155-169.
    3. Whitney K. Newey & Richard J. Smith, 2004. "Higher Order Properties of Gmm and Generalized Empirical Likelihood Estimators," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 72(1), pages 219-255, January.
    4. Shuyuan He & Wei Liang & Junshan Shen & Grace Yang, 2016. "Empirical Likelihood for Right Censored Lifetime Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(514), pages 646-655, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiayin Zheng & Junshan Shen & Shuyuan He, 2014. "Adjusted empirical likelihood for right censored lifetime data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 827-839, August.
    2. Hansen, Lars Peter, 2013. "Uncertainty Outside and Inside Economic Models," Nobel Prize in Economics documents 2013-7, Nobel Prize Committee.
    3. Chang, Jinyuan & Chen, Song Xi & Chen, Xiaohong, 2015. "High dimensional generalized empirical likelihood for moment restrictions with dependent data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 283-304.
    4. Paulo M. D. C. Parente & Richard J. Smith, 2021. "Quasi‐maximum likelihood and the kernel block bootstrap for nonlinear dynamic models," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(4), pages 377-405, July.
    5. Menzel, Konrad, 2014. "Consistent estimation with many moment inequalities," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 182(2), pages 329-350.
    6. Whitney K. Newey & Frank Windmeijer, 2005. "GMM with many weak moment conditions," CeMMAP working papers CWP18/05, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    7. Otsu, Taisuke, 2010. "On Bahadur efficiency of empirical likelihood," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 157(2), pages 248-256, August.
    8. Frank Kleibergen, 2004. "Expansions of GMM statistics that indicate their properties under weak and/or many instruments and the bootstrap," Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings 408, Econometric Society.
    9. repec:cep:stiecm:/2014/572 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Fabio Canova & Christian Matthes, 2021. "Dealing with misspecification in structural macroeconometric models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(2), pages 313-350, May.
    11. Hausman, Jerry & Lewis, Randall & Menzel, Konrad & Newey, Whitney, 2011. "Properties of the CUE estimator and a modification with moments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 165(1), pages 45-57.
    12. Masakatsu Okubo, 2011. "The Intertemporal Elasticity of Substitution: An Analysis Based on Japanese Data," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 78(310), pages 367-390, April.
    13. Xu Cheng & Winston Wei Dou & Zhipeng Liao, 2022. "Macro‐Finance Decoupling: Robust Evaluations of Macro Asset Pricing Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(2), pages 685-713, March.
    14. Shane M. Sherlund, 2004. "Quasi Empirical Likelihood Estimation of Moment Condition Models," Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings 507, Econometric Society.
    15. Zhang, Jia & Shi, Haoming & Tian, Lemeng & Xiao, Fengjun, 2019. "Penalized generalized empirical likelihood in high-dimensional weakly dependent data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 270-283.
    16. Caner, Mehmet & Yıldız, Neşe, 2012. "CUE with many weak instruments and nearly singular design," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 170(2), pages 422-441.
    17. Luis Alvarez & Cristine Pinto & Vladimir Ponczek, 2022. "Homophily in preferences or meetings? Identifying and estimating an iterative network formation model," Papers 2201.06694, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    18. Otsu, Taisuke & Xu, Ke-Li & Matsushita, Yukitoshi, 2015. "Empirical likelihood for regression discontinuity design," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 94-112.
    19. Caner, Mehmet & Fan, Qingliang, 2015. "Hybrid generalized empirical likelihood estimators: Instrument selection with adaptive lasso," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 187(1), pages 256-274.
    20. Kundhi, Gubhinder & Rilstone, Paul, 2012. "Edgeworth expansions for GEL estimators," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 118-146.
    21. Kristensen, Dennis & Mogensen, Patrick K. & Moon, Jong Myun & Schjerning, Bertel, 2021. "Solving dynamic discrete choice models using smoothing and sieve methods," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 328-360.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:169:y:2021:i:c:s0167715220302650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.