IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v64y2007i8p1651-1664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

KW - Quebec: A local-scale evaluation system

Author

Listed:
  • Philibert, M.D.
  • Pampalon, R.
  • Hamel, D.
  • Thouez, J.-P.
  • Loiselle, C.G.

Abstract

Very few studies have employed local-scale analyses to evaluate how well primary health care and social services reach the most socially and economically deprived individuals. This paper describes a project, conducted in close partnership with decision-makers and practitioners at selected local community service centres (in French, CLSCs) in Quebec, Canada, that developed a system for assessing primary care and social services utilisation by applying deprivation levels defined at the local scale (i.e., according to the distribution of deprivation in individual CLSC service areas). More than 25 years ago, Québec started setting up a province-wide network of publicly financed CLSCs whose mission was to offer first-line health and social services at the local level. Now approximately one Quebecer in four receives at least one service a year from a CLSC. The evaluation system presented in this article is built on deprivation profiles for each CLSC service area and comprises maps, relative indices of service utilisation, and an interpretation framework that facilitates the integration of new data into the decision-making and services planning processes. Study results show that deprivation levels, when defined using local perspectives, correspond more closely to decision-makers' perceptions, that relative indices are sensitive to key determinants of services provision and utilisation, and that the interpretation framework is useful for reassessing intervention strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Philibert, M.D. & Pampalon, R. & Hamel, D. & Thouez, J.-P. & Loiselle, C.G., 2007. "KW - Quebec: A local-scale evaluation system," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(8), pages 1651-1664, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:64:y:2007:i:8:p:1651-1664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(06)00638-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krieger, N., 1992. "Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: Validation and application of a census-based methodology," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 82(5), pages 703-710.
    2. Häkkinen, Unto, 2002. "Change in determinants of use of physician services in Finland between 1987 and 1996," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 55(9), pages 1523-1537, November.
    3. Gilthorpe, Mark S. & Wilson, Richard C., 2003. "Rural/urban differences in the association between deprivation and healthcare utilisation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(11), pages 2055-2063, December.
    4. Dunlop, Sheryl & Coyte, Peter C. & McIsaac, Warren, 2000. "Socio-economic status and the utilisation of physicians' services: results from the Canadian National Population Health Survey," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 123-133, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michelle Sholzberg & Tara Gomes & David N Juurlink & Zhan Yao & Muhammad M Mamdani & Andreas Laupacis, 2016. "The Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Selection of Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, February.
    2. Hoeck, Sarah & François, Guido & Van der Heyden, Johan & Geerts, Joanna & Van Hal, Guido, 2011. "Healthcare utilisation among the Belgian elderly in relation to their socio-economic status," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 174-182, February.
    3. Martin Gaechter & Peter Schwazer & Engelbert Theurl, 2012. "Stronger Sex but Earlier Death: A Multi-level Socioeconomic Analysis of Gender Differences in Mortality in Austria," DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, European Association Comenius - EACO, issue 1, pages 1-23, March.
    4. Coast, Joanna, 2018. "A history that goes hand in hand: Reflections on the development of health economics and the role played by Social Science & Medicine, 1967–2017," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 227-232.
    5. Schulz, Jan & Mayerhoffer, Daniel M., 2021. "A network approach to consumption," BERG Working Paper Series 173, Bamberg University, Bamberg Economic Research Group.
    6. Clarke, Christina A. & Miller, Tim & Chang, Ellen T. & Yin, Daixin & Cockburn, Myles & Gomez, Scarlett L., 2010. "Racial and social class gradients in life expectancy in contemporary California," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(9), pages 1373-1380, May.
    7. Floriane Calocer & Olivier Dejardin & Karine Droulon & Guy Launoy & Gilles Defer, 2018. "Socio-economic status influences access to second-line disease modifying treatment in Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, February.
    8. Allison C. Morgan & Nicholas LaBerge & Daniel B. Larremore & Mirta Galesic & Jennie E. Brand & Aaron Clauset, 2022. "Socioeconomic roots of academic faculty," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(12), pages 1625-1633, December.
    9. Jinani Jayasekera & Eberechukwu Onukwugha & Christopher Cadham & Donna Harrington & Sarah Tom & Francoise Pradel & Michael Naslund, 2019. "An ecological approach to monitor geographic disparities in cancer outcomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, June.
    10. Justin Stoler & John R Weeks & Richard Appiah Otoo, 2013. "Drinking Water in Transition: A Multilevel Cross-sectional Analysis of Sachet Water Consumption in Accra," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-11, June.
    11. Michael Adjemian & Jeffrey Williams, 2009. "Using census aggregates to proxy for household characteristics: an application to vehicle ownership," Transportation, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 223-241, March.
    12. Masayoshi Oka, 2022. "Census-Tract-Level Median Household Income and Median Family Income Estimates: A Unidimensional Measure of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-23, December.
    13. Yanhong Gong & Xiaoxv Yin & Yunxia Wang & Yongbin Li & Geng Qin & Liqun Liu & Wei Zhou & Fujian Song & Xiaoxin Dong & Shiyi Cao & Chen Yang & Huajie Yang & Jun Xie & Junan Liu & Zuxun Lu, 2014. "Social Determinants of Community Health Services Utilization among the Users in China: A 4-Year Cross-Sectional Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-7, May.
    14. Van der Heyden, J. H. A. & Demarest, S. & Tafforeau, J. & Van Oyen, H., 2003. "Socio-economic differences in the utilisation of health services in Belgium," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 153-165, August.
    15. Pen-Jen Wang & Yiing-Jenq Chou & Cheng-Hua Lee & Christy Pu, 2010. "Diffusion of new medication across different income groups under a universal health insurance program: an example involving newly enlisted nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for elderly osteoarthrit," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 55(5), pages 497-506, October.
    16. Stacey L Tannenbaum & Monique Hernandez & D Dandan Zheng & Daniel A Sussman & David J Lee, 2014. "Individual- and Neighborhood-Level Predictors of Mortality in Florida Colorectal Cancer Patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-10, August.
    17. Burke, Amanda & Jones, Andy, 2019. "The development of an index of rural deprivation: A case study of Norfolk, England," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 93-103.
    18. Terraneo, Marco, 2015. "Inequities in health care utilization by people aged 50+: Evidence from 12 European countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 154-163.
    19. Kurt R. Brekke & Tor Helge Holmås & Karin Monstad & Odd Rune Straume, 2018. "Socio‐economic status and physicians' treatment decisions," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 77-89, March.
    20. Nathaniel Jembere & Michael A Campitelli & Morris Sherman & Jordan J Feld & Wendy Lou & Stuart Peacock & Eric Yoshida & Murray D Krahn & Craig Earle & Hla-Hla Thein, 2012. "Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Survival of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Ontario Population; A Population-Based Study, 1990–2009," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-10, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:64:y:2007:i:8:p:1651-1664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.