IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Trust, learning, and vaccination: a case study of a North Indian village

Listed author(s):
  • Das, Jishnu
  • Das, Saumya

For US $17 a child can be immunized against six major illnesses. Even at this price, a country such as India would have to spend half its health budget on providing vaccinations. Given the wide variation in immunization costs it may be possible to decrease this cost to more sustainable levels, but to do so we need to arrive at a more thorough understanding of factors affecting household demand for vaccination. Using data on vaccination and pre-natal care collected by the authors in the Garhwal region of India, we explore one aspect of the demand for vaccination in some detail. We show that informational constraints play an important role in the household decision to seek vaccination, and moreover, that learning about the efficacy of vaccinations only through empirical observation may be hard even in environments with variation in vaccination and the high incidence of vaccine-preventable diseases. We argue that when learning about vaccination is inefficient, households use concurrent interventions with easily observable outcomes to evaluate the veracity of a provider's claim regarding preventive care. Hence, the success of immunization programs becomes crucially linked to the success of parallel programs by the same provider.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Social Science & Medicine.

Volume (Year): 57 (2003)
Issue (Month): 1 (July)
Pages: 97-112

in new window

Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:57:y:2003:i:1:p:97-112
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Postal:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:57:y:2003:i:1:p:97-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.