IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v379y2025ics027795362500468x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the mental and physical health consequences of the U.S. citizenship exam for Rohingya refugees: Implications for policy and practice

Author

Listed:
  • Magan, Ifrah Mahamud
  • Goodkind, Jessica R.

Abstract

U.S. citizenship is critical for reducing refugees' precarity, securing access to certain rights, healthcare, and social service benefits, and obtaining a U.S. passport. This paper highlights findings from a community-engaged, critical ethnographic study examining the impact of the U.S. citizenship exam on the health of Rohingya refugees from Myanmar. Thirty-one in-depth interviews were conducted with adults who were recruited through a Rohingya-led community center in a U.S. midwestern city and were coupled with participant observations at the community center, and in participants’ homes and neighborhoods. Our study criteria for eligibility included: (1) identifying as ethnically Rohingya, (2) currently living in the Greater [anonymous] area, (3) being at least 13 years of age. We found that Rohingya refugees experience multiple stressors related to the U.S. citizenship exam, which may impact their mental and physical health. These stressors are often exacerbated by their identities as stateless refugees with a longstanding history of trauma and denial of the right to seek formal schooling in their country of origin. Although we also found that community-led initiatives can play an integral role in mitigating some of these stressors, our findings raise critical questions and highlight the importance of considering the ethical and health implications of requiring refugees resettled due to their persecution and exposure to trauma to pass a difficult exam to become U.S. citizens.

Suggested Citation

  • Magan, Ifrah Mahamud & Goodkind, Jessica R., 2025. "Understanding the mental and physical health consequences of the U.S. citizenship exam for Rohingya refugees: Implications for policy and practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 379(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:379:y:2025:i:c:s027795362500468x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795362500468X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118138?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:379:y:2025:i:c:s027795362500468x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.