IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v376y2025ics0277953625004435.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can care ethics help healthcare systems address their environmental harms? Findings from focus groups with members of the UK public

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel, Gabrielle
  • MacFarlane, Miranda
  • Briggs, Sarah

Abstract

Bioethics scholars have become increasingly interested in moral questions associated with healthcare's environmental harms. Much of this scholarship has remained in the theoretical space, where ethical reasoning is underpinned by certain obligations and the implementation of top-down principles. Drawing on twelve focus groups with members of the UK public, this paper aims to bring a sociological ethics of care approach to these discussions. In fulfilling this aim, we highlight how moral decision-making occurs in the context of interrelationships with others, and not simply according to top-down principles. We show how, in line with an ethics of care approach, participants prioritised caring needs based on those in close relational proximity, meaning that emphasis was placed primarily on themselves and their loved ones, followed by other humans and the NHS, and finally the environment. At the same time, we contribute to the ethics of care scholarship by showing how such relation-based hierarchical caring was affected by various socio-cultural and political factors–what we have called ‘contextual caring’. We note four factors: access to healthcare, capability of care work, increasing understanding of the relationship between humans and the environment, and societal norms of environmental citizenship. We stress the importance of considering these socio-cultural and political factors in any examination of how relation-based hierarchical care occurs in practice. We reflect on the implications of our focus group findings for policy measures towards addressing the UK NHS's environmental harms.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel, Gabrielle & MacFarlane, Miranda & Briggs, Sarah, 2025. "Can care ethics help healthcare systems address their environmental harms? Findings from focus groups with members of the UK public," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 376(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:376:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625004435
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625004435
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118113?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:sae:envval:v:21:y:2012:i:4:p:459-474 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:sae:envval:v:19:y:2010:i:2:p:147-167 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Andrew Hantel & Emily Senay & Cristina Richie & Anna Revette & Brett Nava-Coulter & Fay J. Hlubocky & Thomas P. Walsh & Mark Siegler & Gregory A. Abel, 2024. "A focus group study of ethical issues during climate-informed health decision-making," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 14(10), pages 1040-1046, October.
    4. Madison Seymour & Sean Connelly, 2023. "Regenerative agriculture and a more-than-human ethic of care: a relational approach to understanding transformation," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(1), pages 231-244, March.
    5. O'Neill, Onora, 1990. "Justice, Gender and International Boundaries," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(4), pages 439-459, October.
    6. Rock, Melanie J. & Degeling, Chris, 2015. "Public health ethics and more-than-human solidarity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 61-67.
    7. Caroline A B Redhead & Sara Fovargue & Lucy Frith & Anna Chiumento & Heather Draper & Paul B Baines, 2023. "Relationships, Rights, And Responsibilities: (Re)Viewing The Nhs Constitution For The Post-Pandemic ‘New Normal’," Medical Law Review, Oxford University Press, vol. 31(1), pages 83-108.
    8. Christopher Groves & Fiona Shirani & Nick Pidgeon & Catherine Cherry & Gareth Thomas & Erin Roberts & Karen Henwood, 2021. "A Missing Link? Capabilities, the Ethics of Care and the Relational Context of Energy Justice," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 249-269, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Strauser & William P. Stewart, 2024. "Moving beyond production: community narratives for good farming," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(3), pages 1195-1210, September.
    2. George Jiglau & Marlies Hesselman & Audrey Dobbins & Katrin Grossmann & Rachel Guyet & Sergio Tirado Herrero & Anaïs Varo, 2024. "Energy and the social contract: From “energy consumers” to “people with a right to energy”," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 1321-1336, February.
    3. Pradeep Rai & Sosheel S. Godfrey & Christine E. Storer & Karl Behrendt & Ryan H. L. Ip & Thomas L. Nordblom, 2025. "Unravelling Regenerative Agriculture’s Sustainability Benefits and Outcomes: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Siciliano, Giuseppina & Cantoni, Roberto & Lonn, Pichdara & Por, Narith & Kry, Solany & Morn, Chimmor & Oudom, Ham, 2025. "“Leave no one behind”. A power-capabilities-energy justice perspective on energy transition in remote rural communities in Cambodia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    5. Rock, Melanie J. & Rault, Dawn & Degeling, Chris, 2017. "Dog-bites, rabies and One Health: Towards improved coordination in research, policy and practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 126-133.
    6. van Uffelen, Nynke & ten Caat, Sander, 2025. "Detecting energy injustices: Climbing the ladder of “hidden morality”," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    7. Elton, Sarah, 2021. "Relational health: Theorizing plants as health-supporting actors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    8. Julie Snorek & Susanne Freidberg & Geneva Smith, 2024. "Relationships of regeneration in Great Plains commodity agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(4), pages 1449-1464, December.
    9. Melanie Rock & Gwendolyn Blue, 2020. "Healthy publics as multi-species matters: solidarity with people’s pets in One Health promotion," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, December.
    10. Wing-Fung Lo & Li-Pei Peng, 2025. "Synergistic effect of relational values in a participatory guarantee system: a case study of an ecoagriculture initiative in Taiwan," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(2), pages 803-824, June.
    11. Camille Bellet & Lindsay Hamilton & Jonathan Rushton, 2021. "Re-thinking public health: Towards a new scientific logic of routine animal health care in European industrial farming," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Davis, Alicia & Sharp, Jo, 2020. "Rethinking One Health: Emergent human, animal and environmental assemblages," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    13. Sadeeka L. Jayasinghe & Dean T. Thomas & Jonathan P. Anderson & Chao Chen & Ben C. T. Macdonald, 2023. "Global Application of Regenerative Agriculture: A Review of Definitions and Assessment Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-49, November.
    14. Esmonde, Katelyn & Jones, Jeff & Johns, Michaela & Hutler, Brian & Faden, Ruth & Barnhill, Anne, 2024. "“Lives versus livelihoods”: Conflict and coherence between policy objectives in the COVID-19 pandemic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    15. Kavya Michael & Helene Ahlborg, 2024. "A conceptual analysis of gendered energy care work and epistemic injustice through a case study of Zanzibar’s Solar Mamas," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 9(8), pages 947-954, August.
    16. Kim, Eun-Sung & Chung, Ji-Bum, 2021. "Korean mothers’ morality in the wake of COVID-19 contact-tracing surveillance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:376:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625004435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.