IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v374y2025ics0277953625002758.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health inequality attributions and support for healthcare policy

Author

Listed:
  • Baute, Sharon

Abstract

This article examines popular explanations of health inequality and introduces a typology distinguishing between behavioural, biological, environmental, and healthcare attributions. Using data from an original survey among 6000 individuals in Germany, the findings reveal that explanations for the social gradient in health vary by income and political ideology. Lower-income groups primarily attribute health inequality to the healthcare system, whereas higher-income groups attribute them to behavioural factors. Similarly, right-wing individuals tend to view income-related health disparities as a consequence of individual behaviour, while left-wing individuals primarily attribute them to environmental health risks. Furthermore, the study shows that such health inequality attributions are associated with citizens’ support for government responsibility for healthcare provision and willingness to pay higher taxes to improve healthcare. These findings suggest that health inequality attributions play an important role in the democratic legitimacy of healthcare policies. Divergent views on the causes of health disparities may undermine solidarity within healthcare systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Baute, Sharon, 2025. "Health inequality attributions and support for healthcare policy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 374(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:374:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625002758
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117946
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625002758
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117946?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:374:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625002758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.