IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v368y2025ics0277953625000371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“It's a reality that we in medicine should catch up with”: Physician's attitudes about self-sourced and managed abortion in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Karlin, Jennifer
  • Novaes, Juliana
  • Sarnaik, Shashi
  • Holt, Kelsey
  • Steinauer, Jody
  • Dehlendorf, Christine

Abstract

The evolution of medical standards in stigmatized areas like abortion is influenced by medical, political, and social factors. Self-sourcing and managing medication abortion (SSMA) is on the rise in the United States, where individuals obtain medications to end their pregnancies outside traditional medical settings. Physician attitudes towards SSMA are not well understood, despite physicians’ role in setting care standards, providing medical oversight, and de-stigmatizing healthcare both within and outside clinical environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Karlin, Jennifer & Novaes, Juliana & Sarnaik, Shashi & Holt, Kelsey & Steinauer, Jody & Dehlendorf, Christine, 2025. "“It's a reality that we in medicine should catch up with”: Physician's attitudes about self-sourced and managed abortion in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 368(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:368:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625000371
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625000371
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117708?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cambrosio, Alberto & Keating, Peter & Schlich, Thomas & Weisz, George, 2006. "Regulatory objectivity and the generation and management of evidence in medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 189-199, July.
    2. Morgan, Lynn M., 1990. "The medicalization of anthropology: A critical perspective on the critical-clinical debate," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 30(9), pages 945-950, January.
    3. Jones, R.K. & Jerman, J., 2017. "Population group abortion rates and lifetime incidence of abortion: United States, 2008–2014," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(12), pages 1904-1909.
    4. Bell, Susan E., 1987. "Changing ideas: The medicalization of menopause," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 535-542, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Henderson, Rebecca, 2024. "Invisible cancers: Seeing, knowing, enacting and proving cancers in Haiti," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 347(C).
    2. Bhangu, Shagufta & Argudo-Portal, Violeta & Araújo Neto, Luiz Alves & Cochrane, Thandeka & Denisova, Masha & Surawy-Stepney, Nickolas, 2024. "The political stakes of cancer epistemics," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    3. Geltzer, Anna, 2009. "When the standards aren't standard: Evidence-based medicine in the Russian context," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 526-532, February.
    4. Bell, Susan E. & Figert, Anne E., 2012. "Medicalization and pharmaceuticalization at the intersections: Looking backward, sideways and forward," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(5), pages 775-783.
    5. Lawton, Julia & Jenkins, Nicholas & Darbyshire, Julie & Farmer, Andrew & Holman, Rury & Hallowell, Nina, 2012. "Understanding the outcomes of multi-centre clinical trials: A qualitative study of health professional experiences and views," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(4), pages 574-581.
    6. Zandberg, Jonathan, 2021. "Family comes first: Reproductive health and the gender gap in entrepreneurship," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(3), pages 838-864.
    7. Taipale, Jaakko & Hautamäki, Lotta, 2021. "Clinical practice guidelines in courts’ representation of medical evidence and testimony," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    8. Gutin, Iliya, 2022. "Not ‘putting a name to it’: Managing uncertainty in the diagnosis of childhood obesity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    9. Bourgain, Catherine & Pourtau, Lionel & Mazouni, Chafika & Bungener, Martine & Bonastre, et Julia, 2020. "Imperfect biomarkers for adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage breast cancer with good prognosis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    10. Heide M. Jackson & Michael S. Rendall, 2025. "Addressing Abortion Underreporting in Surveys with the List Experiment: Lifetime and Five-Year Abortion Incidence with Multivariate Estimation of Socio-Demographic Associations in Two U.S. States," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 44(1), pages 1-28, February.
    11. Elly Field, 2020. "Material Hardship and Contraceptive Use During the Transition to Adulthood," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(6), pages 2057-2084, December.
    12. Clare Butler, 2020. "Managing the Menopause through ‘Abjection Work’: When Boobs Can Become Embarrassingly Useful, Again," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(4), pages 696-712, August.
    13. Fishman, Jennifer R. & Flatt, Michael A. & Settersten, Richard A., 2015. "Bioidentical hormones, menopausal women, and the lure of the “natural” in U.S. anti-aging medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 79-87.
    14. Ilona Voicu, 2020. "Disease or Release? A Content Analysis on How is Menopause Framed in Romanian Online Media," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 8(1), pages 141-148, June.
    15. Dickey, Madison S. & Mosley, Elizabeth A. & Clark, Elizabeth A. & Cordes, Sarah & Lathrop, Eva & Haddad, Lisa B., 2022. "“They're forcing people to have children that they can't afford”: a qualitative study of social support and capital among individuals receiving an abortion in Georgia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    16. Lindo, Jason M. & Pineda-Torres, Mayra, 2021. "New Evidence on the Effects of Mandatory Waiting Periods for Abortion," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    17. Stella Pachidi & Hans Berends & Samer Faraj & Marleen Huysman, 2021. "Make Way for the Algorithms: Symbolic Actions and Change in a Regime of Knowing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(1), pages 18-41, January.
    18. Gonzalez, Fidel & Quast, Troy, 2022. "The relationship between abortion rates and economic fluctuations," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    19. David Slusky, 2022. "The Cost of Restricting Abortion Access," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 57(3), pages 199-200, May.
    20. Sarah Miller & Laura R. Wherry & Diana Greene Foster, 2023. "The Economic Consequences of Being Denied an Abortion," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 15(1), pages 394-437, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:368:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625000371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.