IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v364y2025ics0277953624009961.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Media bias in portrayals of mortality risks: Comparison of newspaper coverage to death rates

Author

Listed:
  • Isch, Calvin

Abstract

Chronic diseases are the leading cause of death in the United States, yet effective preventive measures receive minimal healthcare funding. This disparity may stem from public underestimation of these diseases’ impact and controllability, with distorted media coverage overemphasizing sensational risks and underemphasizing chronic illnesses. This study compares media coverage of mortality risks to objective measures of death rates to investigate such distortions. Data were collected on 14 mortality risks, including monthly US deaths from CDC Wonder and 823,406 relevant articles from major US newspapers via LexisNexis. Regression analyses and qualitative evaluations using natural language processing tools were performed. From 1999 to 2020, a significant disconnect was found between the deadliest risks and their media coverage. Media coverage fluctuations correlated with death rate changes, yet only 1.7–2.8% of the coverage was explained by these rates. Chronic illnesses were described neutrally as individual challenges, while sensational risks were depicted negatively as collective problems. These results illustrate how the media depict a skewed view of the risks facing the public, with disproportionate coverage of sensational risks while comparatively ignoring chronic diseases. Consumers may consequently come to a distorted understanding of the most threatening risks they face and how to combat them.

Suggested Citation

  • Isch, Calvin, 2025. "Media bias in portrayals of mortality risks: Comparison of newspaper coverage to death rates," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 364(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:364:y:2025:i:c:s0277953624009961
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117542
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624009961
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117542?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frost, K. & Frank, E. & Maibach, E., 1997. "Relative risk in the news media: A quantification of misrepresentation," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 87(5), pages 842-845.
    2. Angel Arrese & Mercedes Medina & Alfonso Sánchez-Tabernero, 2019. "Consumer demand and audience behavior," Chapters, in: Alan B. Albarran (ed.), A Research Agenda for Media Economics, chapter 5, pages 59-76, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. George Miller & Charles Roehrig & Paul Hughes-Cromwick & Craig Lake, 2008. "Quantifying national spending on wellness and prevention," Advances in Health Economics and Health Services Research, in: Beyond Health Insurance: Public Policy to Improve Health, pages 1-24, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    4. Michael Siegrist & Joseph Árvai, 2020. "Risk Perception: Reflections on 40 Years of Research," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(S1), pages 2191-2206, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bertrand, Jérémie & Burietz, Aurore, 2023. "(Loan) price and (loan officer) prejudice," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 26-42.
    2. Chuhan Chen & Syarmila Hany Haron, 2023. "The Influence of Multistakeholder Value Cognition and Risk Attitudes on Sustainable Interior Landscape Design Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Chunci Chen & Guizhen He & Mingzhao Yu, 2023. "Sustainable Watershed Protection from the Public Perspective, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Alrawad, Mahmaod & Lutfi, Abdalwali & Alyatama, Sundus & Al Khattab, Adel & Alsoboa, Sliman S. & Almaiah, Mohammed Amin & Ramadan, Mujtaba Hashim & Arafa, Hussin Mostafa & Ahmed, Nazar Ali & Alsyouf, , 2023. "Assessing customers perception of online shopping risks: A structural equation modeling–based multigroup analysis," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    5. Xiangcheng Meng & Alan H. S. Chan, 2022. "Improving the Safety Performance of Construction Workers through Individual Perception and Organizational Collectivity: A Contrastive Research between Mainland China and Hong Kong," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-15, November.
    6. Jing Cao & Haiwei Jiang & Xiaomeng Ren & Jinchuan Shi, 2024. "Consumers’ risk perception, market demand, and firm innovation: Evidence from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-26, May.
    7. Timmons, Shane & Papadopoulos, Alexandros & Lunn, Pete, 2024. "Public perceptions of electromagnetic fields and environmental health risks," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number SUSTAT126, December.
    8. Qihui Xie & Yanan Xue, 2022. "The Prediction of Public Risk Perception by Internal Characteristics and External Environment: Machine Learning on Big Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Andrea Cerase & Lorenzo Cugliari, 2023. "Something Still Remains: Factors Affecting Tsunami Risk Perception on the Coasts Hit by the Reggio Calabria-Messina 1908 Event (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, February.
    10. repec:plo:pone00:0230967 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Shen-Long Yang & Feng Yu & Kai Li & Ting-Ting Rao & Da-Peng Lian, 2022. "No Control, No Consumption: Association of Low Perceived Control and Intention to Accept Genetically Modified Food," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-13, June.
    12. David N. Sattler & James M. Graham & Albert Whippy & Richard Atienza & James Johnson, 2023. "Developing a Climate Change Risk Perception Model in the Philippines and Fiji: Posttraumatic Growth Plays Central Role," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-16, January.
    13. Xuemei Fang & Liang Cao & Luyi Zhang & Binbin Peng, 2023. "Risk perception and resistance behavior intention of residents living near chemical industry parks: an empirical analysis in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(2), pages 1655-1675, January.
    14. Adriana Galderisi & Giada Limongi, 2024. "Living with Risks: Changes in Risk Perception in the Campi Flegrei Volcanic Area (South Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-22, November.
    15. Poier, Stefan, 2023. "A matter of risk? Investigating the battery purchase decision in the German photovoltaics market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    16. Elisa Kern de Castro & Marta Reis, 2025. "Contributions of Health Psychology to Climate Change: A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(4), pages 1-16, April.
    17. Jan Eichhorn & Julian Thomet & Andrea Gimeno Solaz, 2025. "School is not enough: The role of climate-specific knowledge for transformative climate policy and economic system preferences," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 15(2), pages 355-387, June.
    18. Huiyun Zhu & Kecheng Liu, 2021. "Capturing the Interplay between Risk Perception and Social Media Posting to Support Risk Response and Decision Making," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-14, May.
    19. Rangel, Marcos & Nobles, Jenna & Hamoudi, Amar, 2019. "Brazil's Missing Infants: Zika Risk Changes Reproductive Behavior," SocArXiv fu8bp, Center for Open Science.
    20. Alpaslan, Can M. & Mitroff, Ian I., 2021. "Exploring the moral foundations of crisis management," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    21. Shan Gao & Ye Zhang & Wenhui Liu, 2021. "How Does Risk-Information Communication Affect the Rebound of Online Public Opinion of Public Emergencies in China?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-14, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:364:y:2025:i:c:s0277953624009961. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.